By Neil Leary

Bill McKibben, in his role as a ‘professional bummer-outer’, began his public lecture at Dickinson College by first speaking about the bad stuff, “the valley” – what we are doing to the atmosphere, the climate and the oceans, the changes they are making in the world around us, and the risks those changes are creating. He began this way because, as he said, “Unless we understand the pace and scale of the problem that we face, we have no way of understanding the pace and scale of the solutions that are required.”

Not radical?

Not radical?


McKibben then moved on to talk about what he has done and is doing personally, with students, with, and with others to bring attention to climate change. To make it politically untenable for elected officials to ignore climate change and continue to take no action. To make it socially unacceptable to profit from the extraction and burning of fossil energy.

He also spoke to us about our responsibilities for action. Responsibilities as individuals, as students, faculty and employees of a college, and the responsibilities of institutions such as Dickinson. His words give us much to think about. We are already engaged as an institution in acting on climate change. We teach about climate change, its causes, its consequences and strategies for limiting climate change and its negative impacts. We provide our students, and other members of the Dickinson community, with sills and encouragement to be active, engaged citizens. We are, as a signatory of the American College and University President’s Climate Commitment, working to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that are generated in operating our campus.

But we are also invested in corporations in the fossil energy sector. What will we do about this? What should we do? Dialogue on these questions began at Dickinson before McKibben’s visit, and his visit has energized and inspired many who are engaged in the dialogue.

Much of what McKibben said that evening is familiar to me, having spent much of the past 20 years working on climate change. But one thing he said was new to me and gave me a different framing for thinking about the problem: there’s nothing radical about advocating to limit CO2 in the atmosphere to 350 ppm; radical is making money from fossil energy. Here’s what he said:

“There is nothing, and I mean nothing, radical about anything that I’ve been saying. All we are asking for is a world that works like the world we were born into, and that every human being for 10,000 years has been born into. That’s not radical by any reasonable definition. That’s a conservative request that we are making.

 Radicals work at oil companies. If you are willing to get up in the morning and go to work making a fortune by altering the chemical composition of the atmosphere, when science has told you what it will do, once you’ve seen by watching the melting artic what it will do, if you are willing to do that, then you are engaged in a more radical act than any human being who has come before you.”

McKibben went on to say: “And, if you’re willing to hold stock in that company, then you are, at least, a kind of participant in that radicalism.  Our job is to check that radicalism.”

ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tilerson. Radical?

ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tilerson. Radical?

Through the investments of Dickinson’s endowment, we are a participant in the radicalism of filling the atmosphere with greenhouse gases and changing the planet. I am of mixed minds about what to do about this. Divestment would end our participation in making profit from fossil energy. But we would still be implicated through our consumption of fossil energy, and through our use of resources that were produced and delivered to us with fossil energy. For me, the priority is moving our entire society to reduce quickly and deeply our emissions of greenhouse gases by conserving energy and other resources, improving energy efficiency and transitioning away from fossil energy sources. Will participation in the divestment movement help bring that change? That’s an important and but open question.

529 Responses to “What is radical?”

  1. This is more helpful for find professional Chiropractor Singapore doctors.

  2. Thanks for your sharing! The information your share is very useful to me and many people are looking for them just like me!

  3. Bokep Indo says:

    Thank you for posting this article, it was really helpful.

  4. Restbet says:

    good game. Thank you very much

  5. Çukur 78. bölüm 2. fragman: 3. sezon 11. bölüm
    Çukur dizisi 78. yeni bölüm (3. sezon 11. bölüm) ilk sahnesi yayınlandı. Çukur 78. yeni bölümüyle 2 Aralık 2019 Pazartesi akşamı Show TV’de olacak. Çukur’un bu hafta yayınlanacak son bölümünde neler yaşanacak?

  6. cukur dizisi says:

    Çukur 78. yeni bölüm (3. sezon 11. bölüm) ilk fragman yayınlandı. Çukur’un yeni bölümünde neler olacak? Çukur 2 Aralık 2019 Pazartesi akşamı Show TV’de…

    İstanbul’un en belalı mahallerinden Çukur’un kontrolü Koçova ailesinin elindedir. Koçovalıların Çukur’u yönetirken en önemli kuralları da uyuşturucuya asla izin vermemeleridir. Ancak gözünü bu mahalleye dikmiş ve bu yasağı kırmaya hazırlanan yeni bir grubun ortaya çıkması ile mevcut düzen bozulur. Tam Koçovalıları pes ettirdiklerini düşündüklerinde, ailenin küçük oğlu Yamaç yıllar önce bambaşka bir hayat kurmak için arkasında bıraktığı Çukur’a geri dönecek ve yeni bir dönem başlayacaktır.

    Yamaç yıllar önce Çukur’u ve ailesini arkasında bırakarak yarınını düşünmediği bir hayata dalmıştır. Karşısına en az kendisi kadar hesapsız, yaralı ve tehlikeli ama bir o kadar da güzel bir genç kadın olan Sena çıkınca sonsuz aşkı bulduğuna inanır. ‘Ölene kadar mutlu’ olmak üzere bir araya gelen bu genç çiftin hayatına Çukur’un ve Yamaç’ın ailesinin yeniden girmesi ile hiçbir şey artık hayalini kurdukları gibi olmayacaktır.

    Yamaç’ın Çukur’daki geleceği ve Sena’nın geçmişi ortak bir hayat kurmalarına izin verecek midir?

  7. ahmadi says:

    greenhouse gases and changing the planet ???

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>