Dickinson College, Spring 2024

Tag: 1860s

McClellan and the Election of 1864: Election Amid the War

Republican Lincoln vs. Democratic McClellan

“Conscious of my own weakness, I can only seek fervently the guidance of the Ruler of the Universe, and, relying on His all-powerful aid, do my best to restore Union and peace to a suffering people, and to establish and guard their liberties and rights.” – General George B. McClellan

The Election of 1864 was one of the few elections to take place amid a wartime setting. The two candidates were friends on opposing sides. The Republican Party nomination went, of course, to Abraham Lincoln for reelection and he ran under the National Union Party.  The Democratic Party went a different route in nominating General Gorge B. McClellan, a “young Napolean” war general and one of the leading men of Lincoln’s Union Army.

The Democratic Party was torn between the War Democrats and the Peace Democrats. This duality placed a certain strain onto the Party, thus dividing it and making it all the more weaker in comparison to the united Northern Republicans. At the Democratic Convention in August of 1864 brought McClellan to the forefront of the Democratic Peace Party, also known as the Copperheads. Though he stood for much of what the political group represented, an immediate cease-fire and negotiation with the Confederacy, McClellan was more pro-war did not agree altogether with the cease-fire. He instead promised a stronger effort for the Union to stop the war in the hopeful near future. Unfortunately for the Peace Party, his pro-war stance worked against the Democratic Party and sent more votes Lincoln’s way. McClellan attempted to keep himself at a distance from the strong anti-war sentiments of the Peace Party. In his acceptance speech for his nomination he wrote, “The Union must be preserved at all hazards.” He did not believe in attempting to bring peace into a country where there was no immediate, peaceful resolution.

As the Election grew nearer, Lincoln’s campaign gained momentum as the McClellan Democratic Party continued to lose supporters. The War raged on in the North and the South. On September 2, Atlanta fell to the Union Army. This victory almost so close to the election date brought further motivation for Republican votes and “boosted Union morale.” Lincoln’s re-election seemed more certain with each passing day.

Finally on Election Day, McClellan realized his loss. It was rather inevitable with the events leading up November 8, 1864. The Republican Abraham Lincoln defeated General McClellan a whopping 212-21 in the Electoral College votes. McClellan won in merely three states, Kentucky, Delaware and his home state of New Jersey. It was a sound victory for Lincoln, as he became only the second president in the history of the United States since Andrew Jackson to be victorious for a second election. On that day, the defeated and, albeit exhausted, General McClellan wrote to his friend, “For my country’s sake I deplore the result, but the people have decided with their eyes wide open and I feel a great weight has been removed from my mind.” On that same day he wrote his letter of resignation from the Union Army. General McClellan went happily into retirement.

The Election of 1864 is significant in the elections of United States history. Not only does it occur during wartime, but it also provides insight into the politics of the Civil War. The race between Lincoln and McClellan was not close. McClellan was placed into a tight spot with his divided party and unique views. Though unsuccessful in his quest, he put up a valiant effort against the popular and famous Abraham Lincoln.

1867/1871: William “Boss” Tweed’s elections to the NY State Senate

William M. Tweed in 1865

“Immigrants were quickly naturalized by Tammany judges- on one occasion, under the eyes of horrified Republican observers in 1867, at a rate of 3 per minute.” -Excerpt from Dennis Hale’s introduction to “The Story A Grim Generation: Boss Tweed” by Denis Tilden Lynch

From 1854-1872, William “Boss” Tweed was the leader of the New York Democratic political machine known as Tammany Hall. In the course of his long and colorful career, Boss Tweed used his control of the largely immigrant electorate to get himself elected to the New York State Senate in 1967 and subsequently re-elected, as well as steal millions of dollars from state coffers.

Despite being the leader of a Democratic party machine, Boss Tweed was nominated for the New York State Senate as the candidate for the Republican party. The choice was unenthusiastically greeted by the major papers of the time, starting with the Tribune and followed by the New York Times. It was, in their words a nomination “not fit to be made.” Even so, with his control of the party machine his election was all but assured. The election would even go relatively unchallenged, as the power of Tammany Hall suppressed any real investigation into this widespread fraud.

The election of Boss Tweed to the NY State Senate in 1871 functioned much the same way as that of 1867, in terms of the tactics used by Tammany Hall. The main difference was the publication of Tweed’s crimes defrauding the public by the New York Times led to investigations of election fraud. The results from these investigations, and the elections themselves, clearly bore out these accusations. Not only was an incredibly large number of votes cast compared to the average election (see bottom of middle column), but the breakdown of votes in relation to the candidates that were on the ballot are shocking. In the Ninth District alone, all but 10 votes out of nearly 500 were cast for Mr. Tweed (see top of column three) and in the 8th District, which only say 126 cast, not a single vote was cast for another candidate. There was also a very famous cartoon series in Harper’s Weekly by Thomas Nash known to have greatly irritated the party boss, who griped “Stop them damn pictures. I don’t care what the papers write about me. My constituents can’t read. But, damnit, they can see the pictures.”

There was also a great deal of focus on the way in which the ballot boxes themselves were controlled through the placement of key election officials. This allowed Tweed supporters to monitor and organize the vote directly from voting booths. The positioning of these officials also led to one of the more famous, and telling, quotes attributed to Tweed: “As long as I get to count the votes, what are you going to do about it?” Indeed until a reform movement swept through New York in the early and mid-1870s, putting Tweed behind bars, there was little that anyone could.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén