Art as an Emotive Experience

Wassily Kandinsky was a Russian painter and art theorist. However, he initially was educated to become a teacher of law, ethnography and economics. He studied these subjects at the University of Moscow and taught for a few years before going to art school. He was one of the first people to experiment with abstract art and was influenced by the works of Monet and other impressionist painters. He studied art in both Russia and Munich, eventually developing a unique style. As Kandinsky worked through his style and further developed his art, he developed a theory of art. Some of this theory is expressed in “On the Spiritual in Art” where he discusses the difficulty in expressing emotion and feeling in art. He writes that some ‘pure’ artists are able to put spirituality in their art and communicate feelings through their art. To Kandinsky, this is the ultimate goal of art, it should be able to “intensify the observer’s sentimental mood and purify it”. He writes that the observer should recognize this as the meaning of art and devote significant time to the study of art and not browse through paintings casually, remarking on them as being ‘nice’ or ‘splendid’1.

Kandinsky’s influence on art was widespread, becoming one of the inspirations behind the field of Abstract Expressionism. He influenced many later artists, such as Jackson Pollack, with his theories on the expressive qualities of art, and how it should impact the viewer through all of the senses.

Early Kandinsky, The Blue Rider

Early Kandinsky, The Blue Rider, 1903.

Later Kandinsky, Composition 6, 1913.

Later Kandinsky, Composition 6, 1913.

Kandinsky introduced a new way of looking at art, how did this impact the middle class? Did this make the general populace more appreciative of art? Or did the introduction of abstract art distance the general public from art?

  1. Kandinsky, On the Spiritual in Art, 1946 []

One thought on “Art as an Emotive Experience

  1. I’m very interested in the question in your question of whether the abstract form created more interest in art or distanced the populace away. The more traditional paintings before this were mostly religious, or depicted areas that were familiar to the buyer. In this aspect non abstract art would be more inviting as they could relate to religious scenes or landscape paintings of their hometown. But perhaps for those who were non-christian or religious this would be less inviting. Abstract art might have been geared towards the middle class who could not afford these “grand” paintings, but wanted something unique that would allow them to stand out and look more wealthy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *