{"id":1203,"date":"2024-09-15T12:55:14","date_gmt":"2024-09-15T16:55:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/403lit\/?p=1203"},"modified":"2024-09-15T12:55:14","modified_gmt":"2024-09-15T16:55:14","slug":"character-materials-lisas-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/403lit\/2024\/09\/15\/character-materials-lisas-change\/","title":{"rendered":"Character Materials: Lisa&#8217;s Change"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 In <\/span><i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Rear Window<\/span><\/i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, Lisa Freemont wears a lot of nice clothes.\u00a0Jeffries, comparatively, spends most of the movie in some color variation of the same pajamas; his housebound situation contextually creates no need for anything else. Stella undergoes a few dress changes, but they are always the same shape: nice but never fancy house dresses that fit with the style of the times while\u00a0allowing movement to take on physical domestic duties. Due to her work\u2019s needs, she never wears\u00a0jewelry, and aways appears with unchanging short hair. In other words, perfect for a home nurse\u00a0taking on housework.\u00a0Lisa, not yet with that domestic burden,\u00a0comparatively wears six significantly different outfits in style and accessories. As I will argue, these style changes coincide with her character\u2019s evolving motivation, reflecting character dynamism that Stella does not. Though her character retains a keen sense for glamorous fashion throughout, her outfits become increasingly \u201cpractical\u201d for solving a case, reflecting her growing involvement through visuals\u00a0alone. For length purposes, this post will focus on her initial outfit, her third green-and-white outfit, and her floral dress which at first seems to break the pattern of steady progression,\u00a0but instead\u00a0reflects a choice to increase tension rather than signal\u00a0character reversion. Her outfits always mean something, and this mostly tracks her development.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559731&quot;:720,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 In Lisa\u2019s introduction, we see her in close-up, only zooming out to reveal her full outfit once Jeffries asks jokingly: \u201cWho are you?\u201d (R<\/span><i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">ear Window<\/span><\/i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">, 00:16:40). Who she is, we see, is a woman with elaborate black sandal heels, a flattering but not \u201cvulgar\u201d V-neck black top, complete with a voluminous white skirt- the biggest her skirt size will ever get. She also enters in a white shawl, the thinness of which makes it impractical for anything other than decoration, showing us that this is not a woman who works with her hands even tangentially like Stella. Her traditional 1950s glamourous wave hairstyle\u00a0and her pearl matching jewelry conveys both elegance and money-someone dressing to be looked at, not to do.\u00a0<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559731&quot;:720,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 In contrast, her first outfit after fully committing to the case signals the change in its increasingly practicality, albeit remaining glamourous than Stella\u2019s. Her waves have now been pinned into an elegant but practical bun; Jeffries even calls attention to the change by asking about the change (01:06:21). She still wears all her pearl jewelry- with even her bracelets now having some sort of locks attached that perhaps signals her dedication to the case- but her blouse and pencil skirt are now more like Stella\u2019s form fitting but loose enough style. Her shoes are also still high heels, but without the elaborate intricacies of her first pair.\u00a0 In this scene, the simplicity makes her look like a very glamorous office worker, which makes sense, as this is her first outfit when dressing to work on the case. Aside from her last outfit with pants, this would probably be the most practical outfit for the infiltrating work she does in the following scene- less to grab onto or catch in something. <\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559731&quot;:720,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 And so, Lisa\u2019s next floral, flowing dress with hair down and stylized once more when infiltrating the apartment seems to contradict her previous growth. Practically, her outfit has more to grab onto if caught running away- which happens exactly. But when Thorwald discovers and attacks Lisa, her loosened blonde hair flashing across the screen even in the dark emphasizes the threat more than a tight bun would allowing (1:41:00). Similarly, Lisa\u2019s digging up of the flower bed in her floral-patterned dress- her only pattern ever worn- to find body sublimely creates linkage and emphasizes the danger she faces that explodes when caught by the murderer. After all, Lisa\u2019s solo infiltration of the murderer\u2019s apartment is the bravest action in the film; her character has not regressed for that reason. This outfit, however, misdirects the viewer in thinking she might, and the impracticalness and subtle cues ratchet more tension in her bravery than otherwise than her pre- or proceeding outfit would.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 As such, it seems by the end that those clothing choices will not be made again. We last see a de-accessorized Lisa in sensible loafers and pants, presumably ready for adventure. But her hair is still down and glamorous- thus signaling evolution rather than rebirth. Even so, her changing outfits reflect a dynamism in her character\u2019s focus, and the one time that pattern breaks occurs when the film wants to heighten tension rather than signal regression. <\/span><\/p>\n<p>Work Cited:<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"TextRun SCXW159150655 BCX8\" lang=\"EN-US\" xml:lang=\"EN-US\" data-contrast=\"auto\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW159150655 BCX8\">Rear Window<\/span><\/span><span class=\"TextRun SCXW159150655 BCX8\" lang=\"EN-US\" xml:lang=\"EN-US\" data-contrast=\"auto\"><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW159150655 BCX8\">. Directed by Alfred Hitchcock,<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW159150655 BCX8\"> performances by Jimmy Stewart, Grace Kelly. Thelma Ritter,<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW159150655 BCX8\"> and<\/span> <span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW159150655 BCX8\">Wendell<\/span><span class=\"NormalTextRun SCXW159150655 BCX8\"> Corey, Paramount Pictures, 1954.<\/span><\/span><span class=\"EOP SCXW159150655 BCX8\" data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 In Rear Window, Lisa Freemont wears a lot of nice clothes.\u00a0Jeffries, comparatively, spends most of the movie in some color variation of the same pajamas; his housebound situation contextually creates no need for anything else. Stella undergoes a few dress changes, but they are always the same shape: nice but &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/403lit\/2024\/09\/15\/character-materials-lisas-change\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Character Materials: Lisa&#8217;s Change<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4983,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[145914],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1203","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2024-blog-posts"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/403lit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1203","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/403lit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/403lit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/403lit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4983"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/403lit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1203"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/403lit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1203\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/403lit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1203"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/403lit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1203"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/403lit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1203"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}