{"id":1107,"date":"2023-10-02T10:49:48","date_gmt":"2023-10-02T14:49:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/?p=1107"},"modified":"2023-10-02T10:49:48","modified_gmt":"2023-10-02T14:49:48","slug":"is-the-dracula-gang-just-dracula-part-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/2023\/10\/02\/is-the-dracula-gang-just-dracula-part-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Is the Dracula Gang Just Dracula Part 2?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Dracula <\/span><\/i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">explores various aspects of good and evil in unique ways. Carol Senf, in an article titled \u201cDracula: The Unseen Face in the Mirror,\u201d argues that the people who vow to destroy Dracula at any cost are not much different from him in terms of their behavior.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Senf\u2019s main argument that <\/span><i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Dracula <\/span><\/i><span data-contrast=\"auto\">revolves around the similarities and differences between good and evil reveals a lot about the characters\u2019 actions. Using this interpretation, it is clear that while the main characters, especially Mina and Quincey, aim to destroy Dracula in the name of good, they perpetrate many of the same actions that he does. For example, Senf argues that \u201cLucy\u2019s death might just as easily be attributed to the blood transfusions,\u201d yet Dracula is blamed for Lucy\u2019s death (425). She also argues that \u201cMina acknowledges her complicity in the affair with Dracula by admitting that she did not want to prevent his advances\u201d (425). Her ultimate conclusion, therefore, is that by pledging to destroy Dracula by any means necessary without even concrete evidence of his wrong-doing, and resorting to illegal actions to do so, puts the main characters on the same moral level as Dracula himself. This argument certainly has support in the novel. For example, Van Helsing suggests that \u201c&#8230;<\/span><span data-contrast=\"auto\">if we can so treat the Count&#8217;s body, it will soon after fall into dust. In such case there would be no evidence against us, in case any suspicion of murder were aroused\u201d (Stoker 313). The fact that erasing evidence\u00a0was considered necessary lends support to the idea that the main characters knew that they were in fact committing at least some form of crime by destroying Dracula. Their complicity and moral grayness are further supported by the fact that the only comparable crime to what they were doing was murder. In this way, Senf\u2019s article highlights some of the moral hypocrisy of a group of people who plot to kill a person or person-like creature in the name of good.<\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">However, Senf\u2019s argument overlooks a few key aspects of the nature of Dracula that somewhat undermine her analysis. For example, while stuck in Dracula\u2019s castle, Jonathan sees a woman outside yelling \u201cMonster, give me back my child!\u201d (41). She is then attacked by a group of wolves. The obvious logical conclusion here is that Dracula killed her child and then sent wolves to kill her. This event continues in various iterations throughout the story, where Dracula attacks innocent people and anyone who stands in his way. By the end of the novel, Dracula has killed countless people himself and through his other servants like Lucy. The group of main characters then commits their only murder to destroy the creature who has taken countless lives. While Senf is correct that Dracula is \u201ctried, convicted, and sentenced by men&#8230;who give him no opportunity to explain his actions,\u201d the main characters clearly didn\u2019t view it that way (Senf 425). Mina writes in her journal \u201cBut to fail here, is not mere life or death. It is that we become as him, that we henceforward become foul things of the night like him, without heart or conscience, preying on the bodies and the souls of those we love best\u201d (223). Mina, Jonathan, and their friends felt a moral imperative to destroy Dracula before he could hurt any more people.\u00a0Dracula was a threat that needed to be destroyed, like an aggressive animal that needs to be put down, not a person who also has feelings. One could argue that this makes them more morally repugnant because they don\u2019t care about this creature that clearly has some human-like emotion, but in the end, they only wanted to destroy what could have been an even more dangerous threat if they\u2019d waited and tried to get Dracula to \u201cexplain his actions.\u201d <\/span><span data-ccp-props=\"{&quot;201341983&quot;:0,&quot;335559739&quot;:160,&quot;335559740&quot;:259}\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dracula explores various aspects of good and evil in unique ways. Carol Senf, in an article titled \u201cDracula: The Unseen Face in the Mirror,\u201d argues that the people who vow to destroy Dracula at any cost are not much different from him in terms of their behavior.\u00a0 Senf\u2019s main argument that Dracula revolves around the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/2023\/10\/02\/is-the-dracula-gang-just-dracula-part-2\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Is the Dracula Gang Just Dracula Part 2?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4982,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[125361],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1107","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2023-blog-post"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1107","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4982"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1107"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1107\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1107"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1107"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1107"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}