{"id":563,"date":"2018-09-16T19:24:44","date_gmt":"2018-09-16T19:24:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/?p=563"},"modified":"2018-09-16T19:24:44","modified_gmt":"2018-09-16T19:24:44","slug":"the-perception-of-safety","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/2018\/09\/16\/the-perception-of-safety\/","title":{"rendered":"The Perception of Safety"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-565 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/files\/2018\/09\/DrMoreau-300x136.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"272\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/files\/2018\/09\/DrMoreau-300x136.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/files\/2018\/09\/DrMoreau-768x349.png 768w, https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/files\/2018\/09\/DrMoreau-1024x465.png 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/files\/2018\/09\/DrMoreau.png 1543w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><em>The Island or Dr. Moreau<\/em> features many binaries classic to Victorian literature; nature vs. technology, religion vs. science, etc. One binary that is strongly featured in this novel is that of luck vs. safety, that which we <em>can <\/em>control versus that which we <em>cannot<\/em>, and how belief in this binary controls Edward Prendick\u2019s actions throughout the novel.<\/p>\n<p>Prendick\u2019s narration from the very beginning perfectly outlines this concept:<\/p>\n<p><em>\u201cBut in the first place, I must state that there never were four men in the dingy; the number was three. Constans\u2026 luckily for us, and unluckily for himself, did not reach us\u201d (1). <\/em><\/p>\n<p>Here we have not merely a description of how our main character came to be on the dingey later found by Montgomery, but a story of chance and safety, and more specifically, odds.<\/p>\n<p>It is by pure chance that Prendick has become the narrator of our story, and this changes the way readers might understand personal power throughout the tale. Edward survived the sinking of the Lady Vain, and he survived again when the other members on the dingy did not, but this is not because of any assertive action on Prendick\u2019s part, but mere coincidences stacked upon each other.<\/p>\n<p>From the very beginning, H.G. Wells presents us with this idea that \u201csafety\u201d as it exists in the novel is arbitrary. While Prendick has described how he came to be on the Lady Vain\u2019s dingy, he has also given us a paragraph of numbers to sift through. There could have been <em>four <\/em>men on the dingy, but there were only <em>three<\/em>. One page later, Prendick is the <em>only<\/em> man left on the dingy, following his companions\u2019 brawl and slip overboard. Here Prendick claims, \u201cI remember laughing at that and wondering why I laughed\u201d (2). This laugh is resonant of Edward recognizing his own mortality in the face of forces beyond his control. He is the last man standing, and who can say that he has the ability to keep things this way? The novel is not one in which Prendick\u2019s choices guarantee his safety, which we see time and time again.<\/p>\n<p><em>The Island of Dr. Moreau <\/em>poses that luck and safety mere perceptions. Beyond this, any attempt to secure safety for yourself and others is futile. Edward mentions how while his companions on the dingey struggled, he \u201cintended to help Helmar by grasping the sailor\u2019s leg\u201d (2) but this did not change the outcome of neither man surviving. Prendick might as well have done nothing, for all of the good his assistance proved to be. Our narrator learns early in the novel that personal agency does not guarantee a change of outcome, and this affects his behavior for the rest of the novel.<\/p>\n<p>We see Prendick fall victim to the whim of others despite his own attempts to secure safety for himself. He choses to trust Montgomery when he rescues our narrator yet is then cast adrift by Moreau and the boatmen when he is not wanted. How does Prendick respond to this decision? \u201cI suddenly began to sob and weep as I had never done since I was a little child\u201d (16). It is not until \u201cthe islanders, seeing [Edward] was really adrift, took pity on [him]\u201d that our narrator is allowed onto the island to stay (16). Later, when Prendick believes he has discovered the truth about Dr. Moreau\u2019s experiments, he decides to drown himself rather than be a victim of the doctor, but in the end cannot do it, noting \u201cIt was not in me then to go out and drown myself\u201d (47). It is unclear if Edward can truly be safe whether he drowns himself or chooses to stay alive on the island, to the point where his \u201cchoice\u201d is arbitrary.<\/p>\n<p>While <em>The Island of Dr. Moreau<\/em> does not outright declare that safety is a matter of luck, it seems obvious from Prendick\u2019s own actions that one cannot really choose to make his life safer. Rather this occurs from a series of actions outside of one\u2019s personal control. I think this perfectly demonstrates the feelings of many in the Victorian era who strode to make their lives better, or even just to make their lives livable. It is not realistic to say that we always have a choice and can always use choices to make our lives better. However, Prendick does survive the novel, and perhaps this is a positive note; that while we cannot always choose the trajectory of our lives, there is some way in which we can keep ourselves going, and not give up searching for better.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Island or Dr. Moreau features many binaries classic to Victorian literature; nature vs. technology, religion vs. science, etc. One binary that is strongly featured in this novel is that of luck vs. safety, that which we can control versus that which we cannot, and how belief in this binary controls Edward Prendick\u2019s actions throughout &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/2018\/09\/16\/the-perception-of-safety\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">The Perception of Safety<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3626,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[125359],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-563","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2018-blog-post"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/563","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3626"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=563"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/563\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=563"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=563"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/britishlit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=563"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}