Damien Keown
\nGoldsmiths College, University of London<\/p>\n
This article raises concerns about the degree to which potential donors are aware that their layman\u2019s understanding of death may not be the same as that enshrined in protocols employing the criterion of brain death. There would seem to be a need for greater public education of a kind which acknowledges the debate around the practical and conceptual difficulties associated with brain death, and makes clear what the implications of a diagnosis of brain death are for the donor and his or her relatives. The remainder of the article explores the discrepancy between the modern concept of brain death and the traditional Buddhist understanding of death as the loss of the body\u2019s organic integrity as opposed to simply the loss of its cerebral functions.<\/p>\n
Read article<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" ISSN 1076-9005 Volume 17, 2010 Buddhism, Brain Death, and Organ Transplantation Damien Keown Goldsmiths College, University of London This article raises concerns about the degree to which potential donors are aware that their layman\u2019s understanding of death may not be the same as that enshrined in protocols employing the criterion of brain death. There would … Continue reading Buddhism, Brain Death, and Organ Transplantation<\/span>