Riccardo Repetti
\nKingsborough College, CUNY<\/p>\n
This is the third article in a four-article series that examines Buddhist responses to the Western philosophical problem of whether free will is compatible with \u201cdeterminism,\u201d the doctrine of universal causation. The first article (\u201cEarlier\u201d) focused on the first publications on this issue in the 1970s, the \u201cearly period.\u201d The second (\u201cPaleo-compatibilism\u201d) and the present articles examine key responses published in the last part of the Twentieth and the first part of the Twenty-first centuries, the \u201cmiddle period.\u201d The fourth article (\u201cRecent\u201d) examines responses published in the last few years, the \u201crecent period.\u201d Whereas early-period scholars endorsed a compatibilism between free will and determinism, in the middle period the pendulum moved the other way: Mark Siderits argued for a two tiered compatibilism\/incompatibilism (or semi-compatibilism) that he dubs \u201cpaleo-compatibilism,\u201d grounded in the early Buddhist reductionist notion of \u201ctwo truths\u201d (conventional truth and ultimate truth); and Charles Goodman argued that Buddhists accept hard determinism\u2014the view that because determinism is true, there can be no free will\u2014because in the absence of a real self determinism leaves no room for morally responsible agency. In \u201cPaleo-compatibilism,\u201d I focused on Siderits\u2019s reductionist account. The present article focuses on Goodman\u2019s hard determinism, and the fourth article will examine the most recent publications expressing Buddhist views of free will. Together with my own meditation-based Buddhist account of free will (\u201cMeditation\u201d), this series of articles provides a comprehensive review of the leading extant writings on this subject. <\/p>\n
Read article<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" ISSN 1076-9005 Volume 19, 2012 Buddhist Hard Determinism: No Self, No Free Will, No Responsibility Riccardo Repetti Kingsborough College, CUNY This is the third article in a four-article series that examines Buddhist responses to the Western philosophical problem of whether free will is compatible with \u201cdeterminism,\u201d the doctrine of universal causation. The first article (\u201cEarlier\u201d) … Continue reading Buddhist Hard Determinism<\/span>