{"id":1513,"date":"2011-11-20T19:30:22","date_gmt":"2011-11-20T19:30:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/?p=1513"},"modified":"2011-11-20T19:42:18","modified_gmt":"2011-11-20T19:42:18","slug":"one-week-till-durban","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/2011\/11\/one-week-till-durban\/","title":{"rendered":"One Week Till Durban!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By: Christine Burns &#8217;14<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/files\/2011\/11\/11th-hour-j-logo101_11.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/files\/2011\/11\/11th-hour-j-logo101_11.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"220\" height=\"170\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-1522\" \/><\/a>One week till the UNFCCC Conference of the Parties commences in Durban, South Africa, and we\u2019re going to be there!\u00a0 In all of our studies this semester we have discussed the success and failures of the past conferences leading up to Durban. \u00a0So what can we expect from COP 17?<\/p>\n<p>Well, the Kyoto Protocol only has one year left, and still progress has been slow on a future emissions agreement.\u00a0 According to David Fogarty\u2019s article, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/2011\/11\/16\/us-climate-talks-idUSTRE7AF0IT20111116\" target=\"_blank\">\u201cWhat can U.N. climate talks in Durban deliver?\u201d<\/a> there are four possible options.<\/p>\n<p>The first possible outcome would be an extension of Kyoto into a second commitment period with new targets.\u00a0 Fogarty says that the chances of this occurring are very unlikely or to next to impossible.\u00a0 He claims that the <a href=\"http:\/\/philibert.cedric.free.fr\/Downloads\/Transforming%20Kyoto.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Protocol is too out of date<\/a>, and without including high emitting developing countries like China, there is no point.<br \/>\nThe second possible outcome would be no agreement on a second period.\u00a0 Fogarty says that the chances for this are very likely.\u00a0 He also states that even without an official extension Kyoto can still survive.\u00a0 \u201cIt is a broad-based pact that covers provisions for regular reporting of emissions, market mechanisms that allow emissions trading and compliance.\u00a0 Many of the provisions can still function without new targets.\u201d\u00a0 He makes a valid point that many countries are already forming their own emissions reductions, but can they actually do enough to slow climate change? Probably not, which is why we really need something more.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/files\/2011\/11\/Toelles-Comic.jpeg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-1514\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/files\/2011\/11\/Toelles-Comic-300x253.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"253\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/files\/2011\/11\/Toelles-Comic-300x253.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/files\/2011\/11\/Toelles-Comic.jpeg 454w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a> The third outcome would be the \u201cfudge option- a political agreement on Kyoto.\u201d\u00a0 This he claims is likely, because of a strong commitment form developing countries to keep <a href=\"http:\/\/www.boell.org.za\/web\/cop17-801.html\" target=\"_blank\">Kyoto<\/a> alive.\u00a0 This political agreement would be a non-binding agreement between the rich nations to extend the existing Kyoto targets for a couple of years.\u00a0 The important reporting and emissions trading aspects of Kyoto could be maintained, even though the commitment period is technically over.<\/p>\n<p>The fourth and final possible outcome would be no agreement on anything.\u00a0 Fogarty claims this is possible but very unlikely, because the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.c17.org.za\/_blog\/News\/post\/Understanding_the_climate_change_negotiations\/\" target=\"_blank\">South African government<\/a> would not want the fall of UNFCCC on their hands.\u00a0 He says that at the least, a transparency framework is pretty much agreed upon already, and the design of the Green Climate Fund could be another area for agreement.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, I have to agree with Fogarty; I think that countries are too divided to agree upon on a second Kyoto commitment or even a totally new protocol.\u00a0 I think that some wishy-washy agreement to buy more non-existent time is the most likely outcome.\u00a0 I hope Fogarty and I are wrong, and that something substantial can come from Durban, but a look at past conferences and position statements from parties to the COP make me less than optimistic.<\/p>\n<p>Works Cited:<br \/>\nFogarty, David. &#8220;What Can U.N. Climate Talks in Durban Deliver?| Reuters.&#8221; Business &amp; Financial News, Breaking US &amp; International News | Reuters.com. 16 Nov. 2011. Web. 20 Nov. 2011..<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By: Christine Burns &#8217;14<br \/>\nOne week till the UNFCCC Conference of the Parties commences in Durban, South Africa, and we\u2019re going to be there!\u00a0 In all of our studies this semester we have discussed the success and failures of the past conferences leading up to Durban. \u00a0So what can we expect from COP 17?<br \/>\nWell, the Kyoto Protocol only has one year left, and still progress has been slow on a future emissions agreement.\u00a0 According to David Fogarty\u2019s article, \u201cWhat can U.N. climate talks in Durban deliver?\u201d there are four possible options.<br \/>\nThe first possible outcome would be an extension of Kyoto into a second commitment period with new targets.\u00a0 Fogarty says that the chances of this occurring are very unlikely or to next to impossible.\u00a0 He claims that the Protocol is too out of date, and without including high emitting developing countries like China, there is no point.<br \/>\nThe second possible outcome would &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":840,"featured_media":1522,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19448,40558,34197,42301],"tags":[34237,40551,42605,40552,34342,2884,1458,2518],"class_list":["post-1513","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-climate-change-2","category-climate-change-politics","category-key-cop17-issues","category-climate-change-mosaic","tag-christine-burns","tag-cop-17","tag-david-fogarty","tag-durban","tag-emissions","tag-expectations","tag-kyoto-protocol","tag-negotiations"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1513","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/840"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1513"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1513\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1522"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1513"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1513"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1513"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}