{"id":1833,"date":"2011-12-07T13:15:14","date_gmt":"2011-12-07T13:15:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/?p=1833"},"modified":"2012-11-27T23:24:17","modified_gmt":"2012-11-27T23:24:17","slug":"getting-desperate-in-durban","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/2011\/12\/getting-desperate-in-durban\/","title":{"rendered":"Getting Desperate in Durban"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: left\">By Dani Thompson<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Yesterday, the doors of most UNFCCC plenary sessions became closed for civilians and observers. The negotiations are taking a more serious turn, and the U.S. is taking a verbal beating\u00a0by the\u00a0folks of\u00a0the\u00a0Climate Action Network (CAN). At the CAN daily briefing on Monday, we heard over and over again that\u00a0many nations are fed up with the U.S. and their\u00a0constant\u00a0blocking of\u00a0 international agreements for a potential second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol. It seems the time has come for the countries ready and willing to agree to a legally binding agreement\u00a0\u00a0to move forward\u00a0on their own.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/files\/2011\/12\/photo1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-1862\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/files\/2011\/12\/photo1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"410\" height=\"306\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/files\/2011\/12\/photo1.jpg 640w, https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/files\/2011\/12\/photo1-300x224.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 410px) 100vw, 410px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If [the US] cannot get\u00a0your team on the ground,\u00a0move aside and let the rest of the world\u00a0move forward with an agreement.&#8221; These and other strong words came from Kumi Naidoo (second from left), a representative from Greenpeace International, who was in favor of leaving the U.S. behind for the rest of the conference negotiations.\u00a0He said that current agreements on the table are what\u00a0he likes to call FLAB; or Full of Loopholes And B***S***.<\/p>\n<p>Jim Leape (second from right), a U.S.\u00a0rep from the WWF said that\u00a0his country has a &#8220;failure of ambition&#8230;which will lead\u00a0us into a 4 degree warming world.&#8221; He continued, saying, &#8220;&#8230;the\u00a0current solutions and mitigation actions on the table\u00a0will not save us from catastrophic outcomes.&#8221; Mr. Leap also pointed out the hypocrisy of the U.S. position; ignoring\u00a0a problem which is\u00a0and will continue to affect\u00a0its own people. He emphasized his point, explaining that 47 of\u00a0the 50\u00a0United States had declared a\u00a0state of emergency for a climate related disaster within the last year. He said 14 of these disasters cost over one billion dollars in damages.<\/p>\n<p>A third panelist, Sharan\u00a0Burrow (far right), an Australian from the International trade unions, echoed the desperation of our situation in the negotiations.\u00a0&#8220;We don&#8217;t want to wait until 2020 for an agreement, we don&#8217;t want to wait another 12 months, we want one THIS WEEK! We want the U.S. to be a part of this agreement&#8230;but they need to stop blocking.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>These examples are a few of many sentiments regarding the U.S. position (or lack there of) in the negotiations. To learn more about this topic, what is causing the U.S.\u00a0and other countries to stall progress of the COP negotiations\u00a0(and also so that what I am writing will not be redundant for those of you so diligently following this blog),\u00a0check out\u00a0the following posts completed by my fellow Dickinsonians\u00a0here in Durban:<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Permanent Link to U.S. Step Aside, Developing Countries Step Up\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/2011\/12\/u-s-step-aside-developing-countries-step-up\/\" rel=\"bookmark\" target=\"_blank\">U.S. Step Aside, Developing Countries Step Up<\/a>\u00a0by Maggie Reese<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Permanent Link to The Kyoto Roadblock Explained\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/2011\/12\/the-kyoto-roadblock-explained\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">The Kyoto Roadblock Explained<\/a>\u00a0by Tim Damon<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Permanent Link to Is it Dead?\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/2011\/12\/is-it-dead\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">Is it Dead?<\/a>\u00a0by Christine Burns<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Permanent Link to Can a Second Commitment Period to the Kyoto Protocol be Agreed in Durban?\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/2011\/12\/can-a-second-commitment-period-to-the-kyoto-protocol-be-agreed-in-durban\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">Can a Second Commitment Period to the Kyoto Protocol be Agreed in Durban?<\/a>\u00a0by Neil Leary<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Dani Thompson<br \/>\nYesterday, the doors of most UNFCCC plenary sessions became closed for civilians and observers. The negotiations are taking a more serious turn, and the U.S. is taking a verbal beating\u00a0by the\u00a0folks of\u00a0the\u00a0Climate Action Network (CAN). At the CAN daily briefing on Monday, we heard over and over again that\u00a0many nations are fed up with the U.S. and their\u00a0constant\u00a0blocking of\u00a0 international agreements for a potential second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol. It seems the time has come for the countries ready and willing to agree to a legally binding agreement\u00a0\u00a0to move forward\u00a0on their own.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If [the US] cannot get\u00a0your team on the ground,\u00a0move aside and let the rest of the world\u00a0move forward with an agreement.&#8221; These and other strong words came from Kumi Naidoo (second from left), a representative from Greenpeace International, who was in favor of leaving the U.S. behind for the rest of the conference negotiations.\u00a0He said &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":632,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[19448,34197],"tags":[1301,34192,34273,1458,1573,40501],"class_list":["post-1833","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-climate-change-2","category-key-cop17-issues","tag-climate-change","tag-cop17","tag-dani-thompson","tag-kyoto-protocol","tag-mitigation","tag-u-s-climate-policy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1833","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/632"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1833"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1833\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1833"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1833"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/cop17durban\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1833"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}