{"id":280,"date":"2013-03-21T16:21:42","date_gmt":"2013-03-21T16:21:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/digitalhumanities\/?p=280"},"modified":"2013-03-21T16:23:34","modified_gmt":"2013-03-21T16:23:34","slug":"the-future-possibilities-for-technology-in-higher-education","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/digitalhumanities\/2013\/03\/21\/the-future-possibilities-for-technology-in-higher-education\/","title":{"rendered":"The Future Possibilities for Technology in Higher Education"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/www.nitle.org\/livewhale\/content\/images\/5\/239_bryan_1_67099aa7548aabcfef81da04118760de.jpg\" width=\"275\" height=\"413\" \/>A website called &#8220;Evolllution&#8221; (Illuminating the Life Long Learning Movement) has published a fine <a href=\"http:\/\/www.evolllution.com\/distance_online_learning\/audio-future-possibilities-technology-higher-education-2\/\">podcast interview<\/a> with ed. tech. futurist and NITLE stalwart <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nitle.org\/about\/bios\/alexander.php\">Bryan Alexander<\/a>, who was on campus at Dickinson in the summer of 2012 to consult about the <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/digitalhumanities\/2012\/12\/19\/hello-world\/\">successful proposal<\/a> we put together for the Mellon Foundation. In the interview he addresses a number of pressing current concerns, and urges those in higher ed. to think more about the medium to long term future. Here are a few choice bits:<\/p>\n<p>On the coming &#8220;MOOC hype crash&#8221;:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>When we look at MOOCs, what we\u2019re beginning to see is that hype builds to really extraordinary levels; New York Times op-eds, discussions on the radio, discussions on TV news. Just in my own work, talking with campus leaders, talking with presidents, trustees, deans over the past year, I heard MOOCs come up just almost everywhere I go. And so we have to watch out for the possibility that at some point, perhaps this very year, all of that could just collapse. The faith could just dissipate or the interest could go away. And again that feeds in itself. Once people see other people leaving something, that may provoke them to leave as well \u2014 a pretty vicious circle \u2014 so MOOC providers need to really watch out for that.<\/p>\n<p>I know that following the dot-com bust in 2000-01, many campuses backed away from aggressive plans for doing things with technology. They just felt, \u201cAh, well maybe this isn\u2019t going to be a big deal after all.\u201d It\u2019s possible that if we see a MOOC hype crash, that we might see something similar to the rest of online technology. It could impact other fields like digitization of materials. It could impact the move of classes to course management systems. It could even impact the digital humanities movement.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>On challenges and obstacles to the creative use of technology:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>One is, especially since 2008, financial stresses. We\u2019ve been living in the shadows of the financial crash of 2008 and it\u2019s impacted all kinds of institutions in different ways. . . .The cuts are so large that it becomes really challenging to say, \u201cAs a campus planner, we\u2019d like to ask for money to do this brand new thing.\u201d That\u2019s not always going to fly.<\/p>\n<p>The second problem is that we have a huge crisis in higher education, \u2026 [with] public faith in the value of higher education. I\u2019ve never experienced this in my lifetime, this kind of skepticism. They say that colleges costs too much, that universities deliver too little for the price, and when I talk to a campus leaders right now, they say they\u2019ve never seen such pressure exerted by parents and students on them. \u201cAm I really getting a good value for all of the money that we\u2019re going into loan for?\u201d That makes a lot of campuses want to draw in to return to their strengths, which for them are often historical strengths, rather than futuristic strengths.<\/p>\n<p>Another challenge is \u2026 sociological challenges. Most faculty are trained in graduate school to be researchers in their specific field \u2026 and that\u2019s their main focus. And when they leave graduate school and they head into a profession, their main job is to succeed at that and get tenured in that field. They are usually not trained very much in pedagogy and teaching and learning. Some are, some develop a passion for it, but most are not trained. \u2026 Their experiences in technology are often rapidly outdated, if you think about someone who got their doctorate in the year 1990. Surfing the web didn\u2019t exist; the internet was barely on anybody\u2019s radar at the time. What kind of training do they have to be able to teach students through social media? Through augmented reality? That\u2019s a huge, huge gap to cross. For professional development, faculty didn\u2019t cross that gap. But professional development has been hit very, very hard by the recession and the professional development now occurs through new technologies, through video conferencing or social media, again, which a lot of these faculty weren\u2019t ready for. We\u2019ve seen a huge generational divide.<\/p>\n<p>Now there are all kinds of exceptions to this. There are younger faculty who don\u2019t want to do anything with this [and] there are older faculty who are very innovative. But broadly speaking, the generational gap is very, very large. The Pew Internet American Life Project, which is a tremendous research project for how Americans actually use technology, keeps finding a substantial general gap where people over 55 are much less likely to use just any technology that they look at, from mobile devices to social media.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Check out the whole thing, in downloadable audio and in transcript, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.evolllution.com\/distance_online_learning\/audio-future-possibilities-technology-higher-education-2\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A website called &#8220;Evolllution&#8221; (Illuminating the Life Long Learning Movement) has published a fine podcast interview with ed. tech. futurist and NITLE stalwart Bryan Alexander, who was on campus at Dickinson in the summer of 2012 to consult about the successful proposal we put together for the Mellon Foundation. In the interview he addresses a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":65,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[77788,77789],"class_list":["post-280","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-bryan-alexander","tag-moocs"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/digitalhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/280","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/digitalhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/digitalhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/digitalhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/65"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/digitalhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=280"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/digitalhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/280\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/digitalhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=280"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/digitalhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=280"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/digitalhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=280"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}