The Dickinson Study Abroad Program in Bremen has updated their blog. We look forward to welcoming everyone back in the fall.
This would be the intro to your story. Then we’d embed a Google Form for user input. Once they answer correctly, we take them to the next page continuing the story.
In the year 264 BCE, Rome sent a military force across the Straits of Messana to intervene in a dispute between Carthage and Syracuse. This military action, a prelude to Punic Wars, represented a fundamental change of direction in the course of Roman history and capped a crucial period of expansion. Five centuries earlier, Rome was nothing more than a collection of huts on a hill near the Tiber river and its salt beds. By the time the Romans sailed for Sicily, they had mastered the Italian peninsula and invented a system of political subjugation, population control, and military calculation that would eventually make them masters of the known world.
The year 264 also marks a shift in the security of our evidence and understanding of the course of Roman history. From that point onward, we have more and more valuable and trustworthy sources, but before that time our tradition is, as Mary Beard says in her recent history SPQR, “based on garbled hearsay and misunderstood myth—not to mention the propagandist fantasies of many of the later leading families at Rome, who regularly manipulated or invented the ‘history’ of the early city to give their ancestors a glorious role in it.” Our most important ancient source for the period is the Ab Urbe Condita of Livy, who composed his history during the principate of Augustus (27 BCE–17 CE). Originally, the work covered the history of Rome from its legendary beginnings, Aeneas’ flight from Troy, to his own era, the death of Drusus in 9 BCE. Of the original 142 books, only 35 have survived: books 1-10, which cover Roman history from its mythical beginnings to 293 BCE, and books 21-45, which cover 218-167 BCE. While Livy is a valuable resource for understanding the history of this time, and while the study of archaeology and the material record have supplemented our literary sources to a degree, there is still much we do not know or understand about the story of how Rome came to dominate the Italian peninsula by the middle of the third century BCE.
To understand the early history of Rome, then, we must closely scrutinize and creatively manipulate every precious piece of evidence we have, and this project was intended to do precisely that. We proposed to create a simulation of the expansion of Rome throughout the Italian peninsula using the game Civilization V. Grounded on thorough research into the primary literary sources, the material record, and recent scholarship, the finished simulation presents the gamer with a more historically accurate representation of the history of Rome.
Our team consisted of research intern Ian White, coding intern Catalina Ionescu, research advisor Scott Farrington, and coding advisor Todd Bryant.
We expect several concrete outcomes from the project. First, we hope that the general public and the Civilization gaming community enjoy the modified game and through gameplay gain a basic understanding of the history of the period. Furthermore, we intend to integrate the mod into the Introduction to Roman History course at Dickinson College. Furthermore, we hope to present the results at upcoming digital humanities conferences.
We hope that by developing an innovative and creative way to interact with early Roman history, we have opened new avenues of inquiry into a historical question that is current, by no means settled, and often overlooked.
Read the entire ReadMe file documenting the research – http://bit.ly/DickinsonRiseOfRome
Download via Steam – http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1091032377
The rise in the number of MOOCs in the past year has been nothing less than astounding. Perhaps even more surprising is the uniformity of the structure used by 99% of these offerings: videos of lectures posted within a very traditional looking LMS along with a discussion board and multiple choice quizzes. It seems strange that an innovation deemed to be so disruptive would follow such a traditional pedagogical model.
Having a course that is entirely open and online certainly presents some unique challenges. The large numbers of students in these courses is no doubt the reason why their creators followed traditional lecture models. However, along with these challenges come opportunities as well. Their scale allows them to participate in large real world projects, alternate reality games, and simulations. This opportunity to engage the real world is especially valuable for the foreign languages.
For as long as people have been learning foreign languages, access to native speakers and authentic materials have been valued. As a result, educators have taken advantage of each new development of the internet. At first teachers used the web as a source of authentic reading materials and later multimedia. As the web became a communicative platform, teachers connected their students with native speakers as part of a language exchange, first via text and then via voice and video. A MOOC in the foreign languages should not follow a model whereby increased enrollment is inversely proportional to the opportunities for feedback and communication available to the student. Instead, it should embrace the open aspect of the course to foster partnerships among language learners, allowing each student to be a tutor of their native language.
With the Mixxer I have already created such a community. Over 100,000 users already use the site to find language partners as part of a mutual exchange for conversational practice. Some of them, including our own students, are enrolled in a traditional course. Most are independent and non-traditional learners looking for an opportunity to communicate that otherwise would be unavailable. For both of these groups, it would be very helpful if I could provide lessons that progressed from beginning to intermediate level grammar and vocabulary and integrated the language exchanges. In many cases, the grammar and vocabulary portion already exists on open content sites produced by universities or governments. I’ve begun creating these lessons using content from the British Council and Voice of America for English and the Cervantes Institute for Spanish. I’ll use these lessons to launch a combination Spanish/English MOOC in the summer. However, to extend these lessons and MOOCs to other language combinations that I do not speak, I will need additional support.
Thank you for considering my proposal. I’ve created a very short video which I will use to help publicize the combination of MOOCs and language exchanges below. It provides a view of the Mixxer website to give a better idea of how the MOOCs can be created within the language exchange community and describes the role ACTFL and other foreign language standardized assessments can play in the future of open language learning.
[youtube_sc url="fu0Z3vCqxuc" title="NMC%20Proposal%20Todd%20Bryant" fs="1"]MOOCs for languages can connect language learners and native speakers