{"id":1712,"date":"2021-03-29T23:31:21","date_gmt":"2021-03-30T03:31:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/everythinginbetween\/?p=1712"},"modified":"2021-03-29T23:31:21","modified_gmt":"2021-03-30T03:31:21","slug":"turn-around","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/everythinginbetween\/2021\/03\/29\/turn-around\/","title":{"rendered":"Turn Around!"},"content":{"rendered":"

The recent movie <\/span>Portrait of a Lady on Fire<\/span><\/i> helpfully offers a self analysis through the characters\u2019 reading of the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice. The movie follows the brief romance between a noble lady, H\u00e9lo\u00efse, and the female painter, Marianne, who paints her wedding portrait but also shares her love of literature and music. In the myth, Orpheus goes to the underworld to retrieve his wife Eurydice even though she is dead. Hades allows this, on the condition that they walk straight out without him turning around once to look at Eurydice. Of course, Orpheus looks back just as the couple reached the exit. H\u00e9lo\u00efse says Orpheus chooses the memory of his wife, while Marianne suggests that Eurydice says, \u201clook back\u201d. This myth perfectly embodies the second qualifier of queer time presented by Halberstam and the implications of it in the movie <\/span>A Portrait of a Lady on Fire<\/span><\/i> echo the ending of the novel <\/span>Written on the Body<\/span><\/i> in really intense ways.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Halberstam states that \u201cqueer uses of time and space develop\u2026 in opposition to the institutions of family, heterosexuality, and reproduction. They also develop according to other logics of location, movement, and identifications\u201d (1). In both the novel and the movie it makes more sense to think about the characters’ relationships based on the second qualifier since they both return to normative chronology in the end. (That is not to say there is no opposition to be found in these works, I\u2019ll just be lightly jumping over it.) The narrator leaves Louise with her husband and Marianne leaves H\u00e9lo\u00efse to prepare for her wedding. However, the leaving isn’t the same. Halberstam explores the idea of a \u201cconstantly diminishing future\u201d and the pressure and urgency this creates, which \u201cexpands the potential of the moment\u201d (2). In <\/span>Written on the Body<\/span><\/i>, the narrator leaves Louise because of a fear of the diminishing life she has, and, therefore, they have, in the hope that leaving gives Louise longevity in her husband\u2019s care (104-105). In <\/span>A Portrait of a Lady on Fire <\/span><\/i>both Marianne and H\u00e9lo\u00efse knew that their relationship would end and they would return to their respective normalities. But they lived together, for a moment, within their expanding potential even with the temporal boundary of H\u00e9lo\u00efse\u2019s wedding day.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Both stories present a queer reality that is ultimately overtaken by normative chronology. Moreover, this return is a choice made by the characters themselves. Orpheus lived for a moment in a queer reality, that he asked Hades for, where he could bring his wife back to life. Either he chose the memory of her and looked, or Eurydice chose the memory of him and told him to turn around. In both scenarios, Orpheus lives with the beautiful memories he has of his wife and the memories are given new life by the possibility of her continuing to live. When Marianne leaves, H\u00e9lo\u00efse calls out to her, \u201cturn around!\u201d. She doesn\u2019t ask her to stay. H\u00e9lo\u00efse chooses to call out, but Marianne chooses to look. They both choose the memory of existence outside of the normative reality they now reside in. The narrator of <\/span>Written on the Body<\/span><\/i> leaves Louise so that she might live longer. They wrote a goodbye letter and were promised updates on Louise (141). They chose the memory without giving Louise a say. They turned around, but Louise never asked them to. Without both parties choosing the memory there is no closure to their pocket of queer time. H\u00e9lo\u00efse, Marianne, and the narrator keep beautiful memories, but Louise is just simply left. Because the narrator did not include Louise, they cannot rely on her promise to write, only Elgin\u2019s. This leaves the narrator wondering and worrying rather than sure in Louise\u2019s promise. This anxiety is what drives them to be discontented with the memory of Louise and struggle to find her. In comparison, Marianne and H\u00e9lo\u00efse never see each other again and are happy to revel in their memories.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The recent movie Portrait of a Lady on Fire helpfully offers a self analysis through the characters\u2019 reading of the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice. The movie follows the brief romance between a noble lady, H\u00e9lo\u00efse, and the female painter, Marianne, who paints her wedding portrait but also shares her love of literature and music. … Continue reading Turn Around!<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4663,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[169398],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1712","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2021-blog-post"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/everythinginbetween\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1712","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/everythinginbetween\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/everythinginbetween\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/everythinginbetween\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4663"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/everythinginbetween\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1712"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/everythinginbetween\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1712\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/everythinginbetween\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1712"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/everythinginbetween\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1712"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/everythinginbetween\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1712"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}