{"id":1119,"date":"2010-11-17T14:10:42","date_gmt":"2010-11-17T14:10:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/hist-404pinsker\/?p=1119"},"modified":"2010-11-17T14:10:42","modified_gmt":"2010-11-17T14:10:42","slug":"chief-justice-earl-warren-and-brown-v-board-of-education-1954","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/hist-404pinsker\/2010\/11\/17\/chief-justice-earl-warren-and-brown-v-board-of-education-1954\/","title":{"rendered":"Chief Justice Earl Warren and Brown v. Board of Education (1954)"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_1124\" style=\"width: 210px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/hist-404pinsker\/files\/2010\/11\/Earl-Warren1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-1124\" class=\"size-full wp-image-1124\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/hist-404pinsker\/files\/2010\/11\/Earl-Warren1.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"275\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-1124\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Earl Warren, 1948 Courtesy of the Library of Congress (LC-USZ62-92346)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>In <em>From Jim Crow to Civil Rights<\/em> (Oxford, 2004) Michael Klarman\u00a0describes and interprets the contextual factors that explain the 1954 <em>Brown v. Board of Education<\/em> judicial ruling and it\u2019s influence on America\u2019s race relations. Klarman focuses on the leadership of Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren and how his influence shaped the Court\u2019s opinion.<\/p>\n<p><em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.oyez.org\/cases\/1950-1959\/1952\/1952_1\/\">Brown v. Board of Education (1)<\/a> <\/em>347. U.S. 483 (1954) overturned the 1896 <em>Plessy v. Ferguson<\/em> decision<em> <\/em>that declared state-sponsored segregation constitutional. In 1951, lawyers within the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) sponsored a lawsuit designed to force the Court\u2019s confrontation with segregation of schools. <em>Brown v. Board of Education <\/em>was<em> <\/em>composed of five separate cases, from Kansas, Washington D.C., Delaware, South Carolina and Virginia. In the case of each suit black children were denied enrollment in the local public elementary schools white children attended on the basis of segregation laws. Chief Justice <a href=\"http:\/\/www.anb.org\/articles\/11\/11-00875.html?a=1&amp;n=Fred%20Vinson&amp;ia=-at&amp;ib=-bib&amp;d=10&amp;ss=0&amp;q=1\">Fred Vinson\u2019s<\/a> Supreme Court heard <em>Brown v. Board of Education<\/em> in December 1952. Unable to come to a decision and standing deeply divided (4-3-2) Vinson\u2019s court decided to have the cases reargued.<\/p>\n<p>After the sudden death of Chief Justice Fred Vinson in 1953, President Eisenhower appointed Earl Warren, the governor of California, as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. (302) Earl Warren (1891-1974), born in Los Angeles California, served in World War I and as the attorney general of California, before serving as governor and chief justice. (A full biography can be found on<a href=\"http:\/\/www.anb.org\/articles\/11\/11-01052.html?a=1&amp;n=Earl%20Warren&amp;ia=-at&amp;ib=-bib&amp;d=10&amp;ss=1&amp;q=2\"> American National Biography<\/a>) Shortly after Warren\u2019s appointment, in December 1953, the Court heard the re-argument of Brown. In the justices\u2019 opening conference Warren proclaimed, \u201cseparate but equal doctrine rests on basic premise that the Negro race is \u00a0inferior, \u201d but considering the intellect and argument of the black councilmen Thurgood Marshall \u201cproves they are not inferior.\u201d (302) The cases presiding justices included Tom C. Clark, Robert H. Jackson, Harold H. Burton, Sherman Minton, Felix Frankfurter, Hugo L. Black, Stanley F. Reed and William O.Douglas. \u00a0May 17, 1954 Warren publicly announced the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalcenter.org\/brown.html\">court\u2019s decision<\/a> declaring,\u00a0 \u201cWe conclude unanimously that in the field of public education the doctrine of \u2018separate but equal\u2019 has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.\u201d Several primary sources on <em>Brown<\/em> can be found online in the collections at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eisenhower.archives.gov\/Research\/Digital_Documents\/Civil_Rights_BrownvsBoE\/BrownvsBOEfiles.html\">Eisenhower Presidential Library<\/a>.One of the best sources on <em>Brown<\/em>, <em>Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America\u2019s Struggle for Justice<\/em> by Richard Kulger, was originally published in 1975. In 2004 Kulger published a well-reviewed expanded edition for Brown\u2019s fiftieth anniversary, both editions can be found in the Dickinson College Library.<\/p>\n<p>Most scholars attribute the unanimity of <em>Brown<\/em> to Warren\u2019s personal and political skills, including Klarman who identifies Warren as a necessary factor in the court\u2019s decision. (302) Given the influence of Warren&#8217;s Constitutional interpretation on fundamental American rights, numerous scholars have attempted to capture the personal and political life of Earl Warren. Published in the late 1960s, two of the first biographies on Earl Warren include, Leo Katcher\u2019s <em>Earl Warren: A Political Biography<\/em> (McGraw Hill, 1967) and John Weaver\u2019s <em>Warren: the man, the court, the era<\/em> (Gollancz, 1968). Both of these books can be found in the Kennedy Collection of Dickinson College\u2019s Archives. In 1982, leading scholar G. Edward White published the major biography <em>Earl Warren: A Public Life <\/em>(Oxford University Press, 1982) where he examines Warren\u2019s entire political career while considering his seemingly paradoxical character. One valuable aspect of the biography is the inclusion of an appendix listing all the decisions Warren ever wrote. A 1983 source, <em>Super Chief: Earl Warren and His Supreme Court: A Judicial Biography <\/em>(New York University Press, 1983) by Bernard Schwartz focuses and expands upon the history of the Warren Court and examines the differing backgrounds and opinions of the justices. Both of these books can be found in the Dickinson Library and on Google Books. Jim Newton, the editor of the <em>Los Angeles Times<\/em>, published the most recent and highly praised biography on Earl Warren in 2007. <em> Justice for All: Earl Warren and the Nation He Made<\/em> (Penguin, 2007), captures Warren from birth through his service as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The second half of the book focuses on the highly controversial cases of Warren\u2019s career as Chief Justice such as <em>Brown<\/em> and <em>Miranda<\/em>. What is most interesting about Newton\u2019s biography is that he explores the complexity of Earl Warren as a strict conservative who, despite fierce opposition, presided over a liberal court.<\/p>\n<p>Two autobiographies have been published since Earl Warren\u2019s death in July of 1974. (See <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/learning\/general\/onthisday\/bday\/0319.html\">Warren\u2019s obituary<\/a> \u2018Earl Warren, 83, Who Led High Court In Time Of Vast Social Change, Is Dead\u2019 published July 10, 1974 in <em>The New York Times.<\/em>) In the 1977 publication, <em>The Memoirs of Earl Warren <\/em>(Doubleday, 1977), Warren recounts his early political career as governor of California as well as the effects of controversial Supreme Court cases on him personally. The 2001 publication, entitled <em>The Memoirs of Chief Justice Earl Warren <\/em>(Madison Books, 2001) also describes Warrens time in public office. The Dickinson College Library and Google Books own both texts.<\/p>\n<p><em> <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In From Jim Crow to Civil Rights (Oxford, 2004) Michael Klarman\u00a0describes and interprets the contextual factors that explain the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education judicial ruling and it\u2019s influence on America\u2019s race relations. Klarman focuses on the leadership of &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/hist-404pinsker\/2010\/11\/17\/chief-justice-earl-warren-and-brown-v-board-of-education-1954\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":581,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[12444],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1119","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-supreme-court-cases"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/hist-404pinsker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1119","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/hist-404pinsker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/hist-404pinsker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/hist-404pinsker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/581"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/hist-404pinsker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1119"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/hist-404pinsker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1119\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/hist-404pinsker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1119"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/hist-404pinsker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1119"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/hist-404pinsker\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1119"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}