{"id":2888,"date":"2010-09-03T16:59:06","date_gmt":"2010-09-03T20:59:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/?p=2888"},"modified":"2010-09-03T16:59:16","modified_gmt":"2010-09-03T20:59:16","slug":"assimilation-in-england","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/2010\/09\/assimilation-in-england\/","title":{"rendered":"Assimilation in England"},"content":{"rendered":"

When discussing the sphinx of Taharqo<\/a>\u00a0at the British Museum,<\/a> the Kushite king of Egypt, the narrator of A History of the World states that \u201cit makes sense to keep using a language of control that everybody is accustom to accept.\u201d This is in reference to the fact that during their reign in Egypt, the Kushites adopted Egyptian customs to appease the people they were controlling. In response, the Egyptians likewise attempted to absorb the Kushites into their own culture, \u201cblandly calling the reign of the Kushite kings the 25th<\/sup> dynasty<\/a>, thus quietly incorporating them into an unbroken story of an eternal Egypt.\u201d It\u2019s clear to me from this that naming something, the smallest thing \u2013 the ethnicity of an emperor, the description of a statue, the favorite food of a people \u2013 is away to secure power. Speakers in history will always maintain their superiority.<\/p>\n

These strategic cultural \u201cinclusions\u201d smack of what Tarquin Hall points out of imperialism in Salaam: Brick Lane<\/em> <\/a>when Aktar states in frustration \u201cyou people are quite capable of making absolutely anything English if you choose to do so\u201d (247). Imperial nations absorb parts of a culture they conquer to please the people, water it down, and spit it back out as only barely recognizable, a part of the empire. This is what I sense other people worried of Afro-Carribbean culture in their analyses of the Nottinghill Carnival, and possibly with good reason. What was once a celebration of culture could easily become a sort of spectacle for dominant groups. Maybe people come to the carnival to party rather than celebrate a culture. Maybe they come looking for something \u201cauthentic\u201d and tokenize Afro-Caribbean culture rather than really respecting it.<\/p>\n

I\u2019ve been seeing this pattern all over England. There are curry shops everywhere. I\u2019ve had more opportunity to buy it that than fish and chips. I keep seeing women on the Tube in head coverings, but otherwise wearing Western clothing, and I have to wonder if England and it\u2019s vestiges of imperial culture are somehow swallowing other cultures as well. I see mixed race couples, and wonder what they call themselves since hybrid identities like Asian-American don\u2019t really seem to exist in Britain the way they do back home.<\/p>\n

I have always been taught that assimilation is a tool for silencing so marginalized groups can\u2019t write their own history. In the United States, when someone tells you to speak English, straighten your hair<\/a>, and embrace the American Dream, it really means your people are ugly and unimportant; pretend to belong and maybe we will tolerate you. But at the same time, the absorption of different cultures in England really could be a compromise. I haven\u2019t heard any racial slurs yet. The fact that there is so much diversity and interracial mingling without conflict suggests that people don\u2019t feel marginalized. Rather being coerced or having their customs forcibly erased, maybe new immigrant English consciously choose to adopt some dominant customs as a way to gain acceptance Maybe assimilation in this case is really the kind of cultural sharing that a society needs to operate peacefully. But my American instincts are still tell me to run before I start saying sorry every 5 seconds and can\u2019t talk about money.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

When discussing the sphinx of Taharqo\u00a0at the British Museum, the Kushite king of Egypt, the narrator of A History of the World states that \u201cit makes sense to keep using a language of control that everybody is accustom to accept.\u201d This is in reference to the fact that during their reign in Egypt, the Kushites […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":445,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6671,1],"tags":[1350,6740,6742,1151,1349,1159,6741],"class_list":["post-2888","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2010-jesse","category-uncategorized","tag-assimilation","tag-british-imperialism","tag-cultural-silence","tag-identity","tag-race","tag-salaam-brick-lane","tag-taharqo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2888","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/445"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2888"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2888\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2888"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2888"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2888"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}