{"id":3030,"date":"2010-09-07T15:58:51","date_gmt":"2010-09-07T19:58:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/?p=3030"},"modified":"2010-09-07T15:58:51","modified_gmt":"2010-09-07T19:58:51","slug":"the-least-religious-church-on-earth","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/2010\/09\/the-least-religious-church-on-earth\/","title":{"rendered":"The Least Religious Church on Earth"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Kate Fox told us that &#8220;the Church of England is the least religious church on earth&#8221; (354). I didn&#8217;t really understand how any organized church could fail to be religious until our visit to Westminster Abbey.<\/p>\n<p>I mean, it&#8217;s incredible that most important aspects of English history and culture have fit into one beautiful building, dead bodies and all, from martyrs to scientists to poets to monarchs to the Unknown Warrior (which, just to say it, is the most beautiful monument I&#8217;ve ever seen). I&#8217;m <em>impressed<\/em> by Westminster Abbey. But I&#8217;ve never felt God more minimized. Other than a bland and generic &#8220;prayer&#8221; every once in a while, and the odd miniature stone saint or cross, the focus of Westminster Abbey is much more King and Country than God. I always thought Church of England was another way of saying Church <em>in<\/em> England; nope, this Church really is all about worshipping itself. Westminster Abbey is ground hallowed by history and culture, art and architecture, not by faith. I see why England wants to share this heritage with the world, but make no mistake about it &#8211; their concern is preservation of culture, not preservation of faith.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_3067\" style=\"width: 235px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/files\/2010\/09\/DSCN1441.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-3067\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-3067\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/files\/2010\/09\/DSCN1441-225x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"225\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/files\/2010\/09\/DSCN1441-225x300.jpg 225w, https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/files\/2010\/09\/DSCN1441-768x1024.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-3067\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Westminster Abbey. Beautiful? Yes. Reverent? No. (personal photo)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>You might respond to this criticism by saying that without opening the Abbey as a tourist attraction, we&#8217;d be denying visitors an important experience in English culture. You might also say that if the Abbey wasn&#8217;t so accessible to tourists, it would be difficult to raise the funds to keep it open and maintained at all (this may apply less to Westminster and more to other churches and cathedrals around England &#8211; Bath Abbey, for example, or Southwark Cathedral, which are less centrally located and famous).<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_3068\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/files\/2010\/09\/DSCN1416.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-3068\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-3068\" src=\"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/files\/2010\/09\/DSCN1416-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/files\/2010\/09\/DSCN1416-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/files\/2010\/09\/DSCN1416-1024x768.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-3068\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Bath Abbey (personal photo)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>I understand those points, but I have to wonder if, in this case, the chicken or the egg came first. Would parishoners be more prone to attend church as serious worshippers if the site wasn&#8217;t so wholly reduced to a tourist attraction or a history museum? I&#8217;m not an anthropologist or a religion major, but I don&#8217;t see how people can be expected to take their faith seriously if the church to which they belong doesn&#8217;t even take it seriously. Religion is <em>part<\/em> of culture, but to believers it&#8217;s much, much more than culture alone. To a believer, faith in God is literally a matter of life and death (and afterlife) in ways that food, clothing, music, and other aspects of culture can never be. The Church of England doesn&#8217;t seem to make any <em>demands<\/em> on visitors to its hallowed places &#8211; Bath and Westminster Abbeys spring to mind. (Any demands, that is, except incessant reminders that donations would be welcome.)<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;d like to contrast the Christian cathedrals we&#8217;ve seen so far with our visit to the Hindu temple today. This temple welcomes interfaith visitors, but only on its own terms, with the understanding that preservation of the Hindu faith and reverence for God are a prerequisite. The result was a moving religious ceremony to which I think we were all attentive, and a deeply reverent tribute to the Hindu faith, culture and history in the exhibition hall. I think if the temple let tourists wander in and out freely, messing with their audio guides, joking around, texting, taking pictures of the ceremony, what have you, the Hindu temple would be reduced to a cultural tourist attraction to check off a list rather than a spiritual experience. Also significantly, tourists like ourselves would feel like outsiders peeking in on someone else&#8217;s faith. Today, I felt like I was actively participating in a faith community. I felt like an insider rather than a voyeur. I think preserving this sense of reverence works out for the best for both visitors and believers, and I&#8217;d like to see more of it from the Church of England.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kate Fox told us that &#8220;the Church of England is the least religious church on earth&#8221; (354). I didn&#8217;t really understand how any organized church could fail to be religious until our visit to Westminster Abbey. I mean, it&#8217;s incredible that most important aspects of English history and culture have fit into one beautiful building, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":392,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6684,93],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3030","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2010-marys","category-churches-and-cathedrals"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3030","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/392"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3030"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3030\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3030"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3030"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/norwichhumanities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3030"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}