Regent\u2019s Park, like all of London, is composed of winding and difficult to follow paths. It contains massive open fields and has a number of soccer pitches and tennis courts. The sports fields immediately set Regent\u2019s apart from St. James and The Green\u00a0 Park. In Green, the main activity was a good sit and St. James has banned sports.<\/p>\n
Aesthetically , St. James and Regent\u2019s are also quite different from one another. Regent\u2019s is grand; it seems as though it strives to impress. And, certainly, in my opinion it does not fail. There are manicured gardens with varieties of annual flowers in picturesque arrangements. The gardens are mulched and created with distinct lines.\u00a0 It has expansive views, with long open fields and a good look at the city from Primrose Hill. Fountains and statues with hanging flowers populate the Avenue Gardens and the Queen Mary Garden\u2019s are equally impressive. The gardens will consist of multicolored flowers arranged in intricate patterns.<\/p>\n
At St. James the attempt is evidently for a natural look. The flowers, while some are manicured, are more often wildflowers in large patches, with various flowers intermixed in an elegantly effortless manner. The waterfowl and stream provide for a beautiful look and the Pelicans are massive and elegant. I\u2019ve seen pigeons, ducks, geese, swans and pelicans, which make for a lovely array. The view from Blue Bridge down the entire canal and to the surrounding buildings is another great one. St. James also has more randomly placed trees throughout the park.<\/p>\n
In the end, I find Regent\u2019s to be more attractive. It has it\u2019s manicured parts, which are nice to walk past and get a look at, but my favorite aspect is the expanse of the park. With so much room it is always possible to find a nook to sit alone, undisturbed.\n\t\t