In Koenker\u2019s The Proliterian Tourist in the 1930s<\/i>, and Reagin\u2019s Comparing Apples and Oranges<\/i>, both authors place emphasis on specific societal institutions.\u00a0 Tourism in the Soviet Union became very politically focused during the inter-war period.\u00a0 In Germany, the ideals of consumption were promoted by housewives.\u00a0 Both articles provide basic insights into each organization and their various contributions to society.\u00a0 It is clear that in both the Soviet Union and Germany, tourism and housewife organizations were utilized for the promotion of political and social ideologies.<\/p>\n
Koenker\u2019s description of tourism was both intriguing and surprising; she argued that a concept as seemingly casual as tourism had intentions of a larger political scheme, which was to promote socialism, and stray away from the bourgeois life.\u00a0 While there are many obvious ways in which they implemented this change, it is shocking that the Soviets would turn to organizations like tourism to solve these issues.\u00a0 This essay is substantial, because it depicts the significance of everyday activities with regards to a larger political agenda.<\/p>\n
Comparing Apples and Oranges <\/i>was similarly striking in terms of highlighting Germany\u2019s reliance on everyday institutions to solve social and political issues. What was surprising in this article was the reliance on women to solve such substantial issues.\u00a0 During the inter-war period, it was clear that the woman\u2019s place was in the home.\u00a0 While this article supports that ideal, it argues that being a housewife was actually a crucial responsibility. Housewife organizations were responsible for promoting German manufactured goods, rationalization, and natural ingredients.\u00a0 It is surprising that women, as second-class citizens at that time, would be relied upon for such pressing issues.<\/p>\n
Why were everyday organizations like tourism and housewife organizations targeted as catalysts for political change? Why were these specific groups believed to be beneficial to the political agendas of the Soviet Union and Germany?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In Koenker\u2019s The Proliterian Tourist in the 1930s, and Reagin\u2019s Comparing Apples and Oranges, both authors place emphasis on specific societal institutions.\u00a0 Tourism in the Soviet Union became very politically focused during the inter-war period.\u00a0 In Germany, the ideals of … Continue reading