Main Points:
\n1. Churchill acknowledged that the Soviet Union did not want war, they wanted \u201cthe fruits of war and the indefinite expansion of their power and doctrines.\u201d It is important to note that neither the west nor the Soviet Union wanted another war. It would preposterous to think that any state involved so heavily in World War II would actively seek war with a superpower less than a year after the conclusion of the war in Europe. It is very easy to see how a state would want to assert its power and influence in Europe so soon after the end of the war however, which is exactly what started the Cold War.
\n2. Churchill also mentioned the balance of power in his speech. He recalled how no one wanted to match or check Germany\u2019s military buildup and fascism in the early 1930\u2019s, and how World War II might have easily been avoided if Germany had been kept in check instead of being allowed to gain strength and momentum. Churchill said that the balance of power could easily be maintained in such a way that it would keep the Soviet Union in check if \u201cthe population of the English-speaking Commonwealth be added to that of the United States, with all that such cooperation implies in the air, on the sea, all over the globe, and in science and in industry, and in moral force, there will be no quivering, precarious balance of power to offer its temptation to ambition or adventure.\u201d
\n3. In his response to Churchill, Stalin compared the west to Hitler and his racial theory, possibly confusing Churchill\u2019s mention of the English-speaking Commonwealth with a declaration of English speakers as a dominant race. Churchill also compared the Soviet Union to Hitler\u2019s Germany in his speech when he mentioned the balance of power. Stalin also conflated Churchill\u2019s emphasis on freedom and democracy with a desire to take over Europe as Hitler did. Churchill clearly emphasized these principles in his speech as the ultimate goal in Europe, not domination by English speakers. <\/p>\n
Questions:
\n1. How could Stalin accuse Churchill of being a collaborator with fascism, when Stalin backed the signing of the Nazi-Soviet Pact in 1939? Did that not make Stalin a collaborator with fascism?
\n2. How true are Churchill\u2019s claims that he rose the alarm about Hitler\u2019s Germany gaining power and why did no one listen to him? <\/p>\n
Observation:
\nIt is interesting that Stalin would point the finger at the west and compare their ideology to Hitler\u2019s racial theory when he was guilty of killing millions of his own people and facilitating Hitler\u2019s early success with the Nazi-Soviet Pact. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Main Points: 1. Churchill acknowledged that the Soviet Union did not want war, they wanted \u201cthe fruits of war and the indefinite expansion of their power and doctrines.\u201d It is important to note that neither the west nor the Soviet … Continue reading