The author of the article Sarah Davies sets out on a mission to solve the unresolved question of ‘Was the USSR a class(les) society?’ by presenting her own school of thought. However, Davies proceeds to elaborate that only workers and peasants will be analyzed by differentiating their use of language to form social identity.\u00a0Under Stalin’s regime, language was an issue of national policy.\u00a0 If one were to speak out in an unauthorized\u00a0 manner, it would be considered unlawful against the party therefore separating\u00a0oneself from society.\u00a0 I therefore agree that the Soviet society\u00a0did not exist in a classless state of existence according to the\u00a0Marxist idealism.\u00a0 Marx believed that the eventual elimination of the class society was essential to the development and survival of the new communist world.\u00a0 Stalin’s policy of a unified and single usage of certain dialect would create buffer zones in the way peasants thought as opposed to the regular workers idealism\u00a0in country.\u00a0 That automatically is cause enough for a social identity crisis particularly in the class divide\u00a0realm.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The author of the article Sarah Davies sets out on a mission to solve the unresolved question of ‘Was the USSR a class(les) society?’ by presenting her own school of thought. However, Davies proceeds to elaborate that only workers and … Continue reading