Much like Europe in the mid-nineteenth century, the United States believed that women should continue to be confined to managing the household in the mid-twentieth century.\u00a0 In response, the National Organization for Women developed in 1966 and spoke out against these injustices and\u00a0 lack of progress made in the United States.\u00a0 In their mission statement, the National Organization for Women compared the lives and opportunities of American women to European women, claiming, \u201cWe believe that this nation has a capacity at least as great as other nations, to innovate new social institutions which enable women to enjoy true equality of opportunity and responsibility in society, without conflict with their responsibilities as mothers and homemakers.\u00a0 In such innovations, America does not lead the Western world, but lags by decades behind many European countries,\u201d (3). It is clear, through this excerpt of their mission statement, that opportunities for European women had increased dramatically since Sanford and Beeton wrote their pieces on the ideal middle-class woman in the mid-nineteenth century.\u00a0 Moreover, because European women were not confined to their households like they had been, the National Organization of Women took note and believed that the United States lagged \u201cdecades behind many European countries.\u201d\u00a0 Furthermore, this organization rejected, \u201cthe current assumptions that a man must carry the sole burden of supporting himself, his wife, and family, and that a woman is automatically entitled to lifelong support by a man upon her marriage…\u201d (3)\u00a0 As indicated, more European women became less dependent on their husbands in the mid-twentieth century, as they were encouraged to join the workforce and step outside the confines of their household.<\/p>\n
The progress made by European nations in regards to women and their newfound role in society can be boiled down to two aspects: the golden era of socialism in Europe and constant warfare amongst European nations.\u00a0 Before the start of World War I, many European nations produced socialist thinkers who argued for the rights of European women and workers.\u00a0 Due to the success of these socialist thinkers, \u201cnew social institutions\u201d were formed throughout Europe, allowing \u201cwomen to enjoy true equality\u201d and become more than household managers.\u00a0 Secondly, European nations constantly fought with one another during the early twentieth century; these wars included the Morrocan Crisis, Bosnian Crisis, World War I and World War II.\u00a0 Due to these wars, European men were constantly gone, leaving women without the \u201clifelong support by a man upon her marriage.\u201d\u00a0 In fact, due to their constant absence, women were the one\u2019s carrying \u201cthe sole burden,\u201d for they had to support themselves as well as their children financially and domestically during times of war.\u00a0 In these times, European women proved themselves to European men; for they displayed their ability to manage a household while maintaining an everyday job typically reserved for men.\u00a0 In conclusion, European nations progressed more quickly than the United States in regards to gender roles because of the success of socialism and the constant involvement in warfare; which allowed women to prove that they carried more value than simply being domestic workers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Much like Europe in the mid-nineteenth century, the United States believed that women should continue to be confined to managing the household in the mid-twentieth century.\u00a0 In response, the National Organization for Women developed in 1966 and spoke out against … Continue reading