{"id":583,"date":"2010-02-26T01:38:16","date_gmt":"2010-02-26T01:38:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/sciencenews\/?p=583"},"modified":"2010-02-26T01:38:40","modified_gmt":"2010-02-26T01:38:40","slug":"air-pollution-a-radiation-umbrella","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/sciencenews\/2010\/02\/26\/air-pollution-a-radiation-umbrella\/","title":{"rendered":"Air Pollution: A Radiation Umbrella"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By: Kate Good<\/p>\n<p>In the world of climate change there is much debate over the reality of greenhouse gases and the volatile nature of toxic chemical emissions. However, in a new study, published<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/2010\/100217\/full\/463860b.html\"> February 17, 2010<\/a>, scientists are beginning to look at air pollution as a possible inhibitor of global warming.<\/p>\n<p>The thick black clouds of smog produced from coal burning power plants in Asia seem to be having the reverse effect of warming in the atmosphere. In fact, the dark layer acts like an umbrella, blocking the sun\u2019s radiation from reaching Earth\u2019s surface reflecting them back into space.<a href=\"http:\/\/www.esrl.noaa.gov\/gmd\/images\/budget.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-584\" style=\"border: 5px solid black\" src=\"http:\/\/www.esrl.noaa.gov\/gmd\/images\/budget.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"228\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The most recent work being done on the climate effects of air pollution is being done in New York at NASA\u2019s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, led by scientist Drew Shindell.<\/p>\n<p>In Shindell\u2019s study, a number of scenarios have been run for the years 2000-2080, putting controls on the output of SO<sub>2<\/sub> and NO<sub>X<\/sub> from power plants. While initially SO<sub>2<\/sub> creates a cooling effect, when unchecked, once controls are put on the warming potential of CO<sub>2<\/sub> comes into effect. When run for longer time trials, without controls on SO<sub>2<\/sub>, the effects of CO<sub>2<\/sub> eventually catch up to SO<sub>2<\/sub>, eliminating the net cooling effect.<\/p>\n<p>In the 1970\u2019s, the United States began the Clean Air Act, which cut emissions of SO<sub>2<\/sub> and NO<sub>x<\/sub> to reduce acid rain and to improve public health. Many other industrial countries followed curbing their own emissions, interestingly, during this period global temperatures increased rapidly after having been stable in the preceding decades.<\/p>\n<p>If having high levels of air pollution in fact produces lower global temperatures, all the work done by environmentalists in the past will be completely void.<\/p>\n<p>Meinrat Andreae, an expert on aerosols from the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Mainz, Germany, is quoted describing this phenomenon as,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/2010\/100217\/full\/463860b.html\"> \u201cenjoy now and make others pay later.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p>While SO<sub>2<\/sub> may seem like a good temporary fix to rising global temperatures, it is also a deathly chemical. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.atsdr.cdc.gov\/tfacts116.html\">Sulfur dioxide<\/a> is associated with increased respiratory disease, difficulty in breathing and premature death. So, even though this chemical may aid in blocking the sun\u2019s radiation, it is still a harsh chemical compound that is harmful to humans when present in air.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By: Kate Good In the world of climate change there is much debate over the reality of greenhouse gases and the volatile nature of toxic chemical emissions. However, in a new study, published February 17, 2010, scientists are beginning to look at air pollution as a possible inhibitor of global warming. The thick black clouds &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/sciencenews\/2010\/02\/26\/air-pollution-a-radiation-umbrella\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Air Pollution: A Radiation Umbrella<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":270,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[2071],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-583","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2071"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/sciencenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/583","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/sciencenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/sciencenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/sciencenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/270"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/sciencenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=583"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/sciencenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/583\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/sciencenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=583"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/sciencenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=583"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dickinson.edu\/sciencenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=583"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}