Research Question:
Does natural gas have a future as a low-carbon fuel in the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy?
Research Summary:
As there is a heightened importance of shifting towards renewable energy resources in Germany, prominently known as Energiewende, there is a lot of controversy about the path of transition. (Steinbacher, 2018). In order to achieve the goals of Energiewende, “a model of how we’ll get power in the future” (Kunzig, 2015), some researchers may suggest a low-carbon transitional bridge fuel to get from fossil fuels to renewable energy (Bridge, et al., 2018). Through this idea of a low-carbon bridge fuel, the responses of people in favor of this have been differing. In response to this, I would like to research the differing views between Germans and Americans if whether a bridge fuel, such as natural gas has a future and why.
Both the United States and Germany have been implementing bridge fuels as part of their renewable energy plan. Germany proposed a plan to phase out of nuclear energy as an energy source after the Fukushima disaster in 2011 (Renn, 2016). Instead, the German government decided to open the Nord Stream pipeline as a way to receive natural gas from Russia (B. Gillessen, 2019). In addition, the United States also has relied massively on natural gas after fracking was developed in the 1940s (Bridge, et al., 2018).
Link:
https://forms.gle/BA6bwkdXo11BMAw9A
References:
Gillessen, H. H.-F.-J. (2019). Natural gas as a bridge to sustainability: Infrastructure expansion regarding energy security and system transition. Applied Energy.
Bridge, G., Barr, S., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., Brown, E., Bulkeley, H., & Walker, G. (2018). Energy and Society.Abington, Oxon: Routledge.
Kunzig, R. (2015). Germany Could Be a Model for How We’ll Get Power in the Future. National Geographic.
Renn, O. (2016). Coal, nuclear and renewable energy policies in Germany: From the 1950s to the “Energiewende”. Energy Policy, 224-232.
Steinbacher, K. (2018). Exporting the Energiewende . Berlin: Springer VS, Wiesbaden.
Sarah Abdulazeez February 19, 2023
Dear Scarlett,
Thank you for sharing your research question and summary. It’s very important to shed light on this topic as the controversy surrounding the use of a low-carbon transitional bridge fuel to transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy is an important topic of discussion, as it has the potential to shape the future of energy consumption. It is essential to research the differing views between Germans and Americans on the use of natural gas as a bridge fuel and to understand why people have varying opinions. I am positive that this research would result in having great findings.
Germany and the United States have both implemented bridge fuels as part of their renewable energy plan, with natural gas being a popular choice. However, the use of natural gas is not without its controversy. While it produces fewer emissions than coal and oil, there are concerns about the environmental impact of fracking and the potential for methane leakage during extraction and transportation. This leads to my question which is; is it possible to fully rely on natural gas, and does the process transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable energy would affect the environment? Thank you so much!
Hadi February 19, 2023
Dear Scarlett,
Thank you for bringing up the critical issue of natural gas’s future as a low-carbon fuel in the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy. I appreciate your thoughts on this matter. To be more specific, it appears that you are interested in investigating the contrasting perspectives of Germans and Americans on whether natural gas has a future as a bridging fuel. Both nations have been using bridge fuels as part of their renewable energy strategies, with Germany depending on natural gas after phasing out nuclear energy and the US mainly relying on natural gas following the emergence of fracking.
Personally, I believe that considering the environmental effect and potential hazards of using natural gas as a bridging fuel is critical. While natural gas may be a lower-carbon option to other fossil fuels, the production and transportation of natural gas can have major environmental repercussions. Additionally, if we rely too much on natural gas, we risk being tethered to infrastructure that will be difficult to abandon in the future. Furthermore, some experts say that natural gas may not be a long-term cost-effective alternative, especially as the costs of renewable energy continue to fall. Also, I would remind out that alternative low-carbon fuels, such as hydrogen and biofuels, are being researched and might eventually replace natural gas as a bridging fuel.
My question for you is, how do you see policy and legislation affecting the use of natural gas as a bridging fuel, and what efforts may be made to ensure that any use of natural gas is responsible and sustainable?
Thank you!
Joud February 19, 2023
Dear Scarlett,
Thank you for taking the time to share your research.
While some claim that natural gas can act as a bridge fuel in the transition to renewable energy sources, there are legitimate challenges that must be addressed. For one point, natural gas is still a fossil fuel and so contributes to greenhouse gas emissions, but at a lower rate than coal or oil. Furthermore, there are environmental dangers involved with natural gas production and transportation, notably through fracking. Moreover, the longevity of natural gas infrastructure may exceed its utility as a transitional fuel, making long-term transition to renewable energy sources problematic.
When discussing natural gas’s future as a low-carbon fuel, it is critical to emphasize an equitable and sustainable transition that avoids environmental impact while prioritizing the needs and viewpoints of communities and stakeholders. This necessitates careful planning and evaluation of a variety of aspects, such as the availability and affordability of alternative renewable energy sources, the possible implications on people and the environment, and the overall aims and timescales of the energy transition.
My question would be: How do the differing cultural attitudes and energy policies of Germany and the United States shape their perspectives on the use of natural gas as a bridge fuel in the transition to renewable energy sources?
Thank you!
Mohammad Arafat Yousef February 19, 2023
Dear Scarlett,
Thank you for taking the time to bring up this issue. It’s critical to shine light on this issue since the debate over using a low-carbon transitory bridge fuel to make the switch from fossil fuels to renewable energy could have a significant impact on how energy is consumed in the future.
Personally, I think it’s crucial to take the potential effects of using natural gas as a bridging fuel on the environment into account. Although compared to other fossil fuels, natural gas may have a lesser carbon footprint, its extraction and transportation can have significant negative effects on the environment. Furthermore, if we depend too much on natural gas, we run the risk of becoming bound to infrastructure that will be challenging to get rid of in the future.
This brings up my next concern, which is whether it’s feasible to completely rely on natural gas and whether switching from fossil fuels to renewable energy will have an impact on the environment.