Plastic Bag Ban

In November of 2020, the German Bundestag officially voted in favor of making an amendment to the Packaging Act. This amendment, effective since January 1st, 2022, prohibits plastic bags from being distributed at supermarkets and stores for shopping purposes. By banning plastic bags in Germany, the government aims to reduce carbon dioxide emissions and plastic pollution. According to the Federal Environment Ministry, the number of plastic bags used in Germany per year was 1.6 billion (about 20 per person) prior to the ban.

Environmentalists argue that the new law is not strict enough, as it only prohibits plastic bags that are 15 to 50 micrometers thick. Plastic carrier bags that are more than 50 micrometers thick are exempt from the ban because they are more durable and typically used multiple times. Ultra-thin bags used to hygienically handle open and easily perishable foods, such as fruits, vegetables, and meat products, are also still allowed in grocery stores. However, banning ultra-thin bags would likely give rise to an increase in pre-packaging waste and therefore create another environmental issue.

Other critics of the new law believe that it is either too strict or unnecessary altogether. A small store owner named Kostas Kallias explained in an interview with the Chinese Embassy in Germany that the government did not allow retailers enough time to deplete their remaining plastic bag stocks. He wanted the government to either compensate him for the money he had spent on plastic bags or push back the effective date of the ban. Bernhaud Bauske, the senior advisor of Germany’s marine conservation department at the World Wide Fund for Nature, stated that less than one percent of the amount of plastic production in Germany is for single-use plastic bags. This means that the German Bundestag could be focusing on the wrong culprit.

Although plastic bags have been banned in a number of states in the United States, including New Jersey, a nationwide ban would be difficult to implement for a number of reasons. In 2017, companies that manufacture plastic bags, such as Formosa Plastics and Novolex, employed close to one million Americans, making the plastic products industry the eighth largest industry in the United States. A nationwide ban would cause a great deal of job loss. According to reports made by the Fraser Institute, stores prohibited from distributing plastic bags are more likely to be faced with dips in sales because shoppers are limited to buying only what can fit inside their reusable bags. To combat the negative effects of a nationwide ban, the United States would need to figure out ways to efficiently re-employ one million Americans and make reusable bags more accessible to shoppers.

Sources:
https://www.plasteurope.com/news/PLASTIC_CARRIER_BAGS_t246462/
https://www.take-e-way.com/news/bundestag-decides-to-ban-plastic-carrier-bags/
https://newseu.cgtn.com/news/2021-01-04/Germany-moves-to-reduce-plastic-pollution-with-bag-ban-from-2022-WL3ksd2JfG/index.html
https://www.dumpsters.com/blog/plastic-bag-bans

The Pfand System

The German bottle-deposit system, or Pfand system, is a regular part of shopping or purchasing any liquid in a bottle in Germany. Most German supermarkets participate in this system. When one buys a drink in a bottle, they are technically paying for the liquid inside and making a small loan on the bottle. When the bottle is returned, the machine releases a Pfand voucher that can be redeemed at the till. Depending on the bottle type, they are either sterilized and reused or shredded into pellets to create other plastic containers. 

Many Germans will collect and bring bottles in bulk to these recycling stations. It is also common practice to leave empty bottles next to trash and recycling bins rather than inside them, giving anyone who wants some free change a chance to take the bottle in and return it. 

Although this system has been unsuccessful in creating a perfectly reusable container, it has been found to be more ecologically sound than the US method of recycling. Because only single-use bottles are collected, rather than the combination of bottles collected during recycling, the reformed plastic can be deemed food safe and can be reused in the food industry. Bottles that are returned to a manufacturer can be reused up to 50 times before losing their integrity, meaning fewer bottles are made and ultimately less CO2 is emitted during the manufacturing process. This system encourages all parts of the distribution process, the consumer, the supermarket, and the manufacturer, to work together and engage in this system.  

This simple system could easily be introduced to the US without any disruption to daily life. America already has the infrastructure to recycle single-use plastic, and many large companies have bottling sites throughout the US where reusable bottles can be returned. Beyond the challenges of creating deposit machines and sterilization facilities, there would also be the cost of transporting bottles, as the United States is much larger than Germany and may have to send the bottles farther away. Another challenge would be making consumers aware of what bottles can be recycled and if they can only be recycled in a particular range within the US. Because the US is so expansive, different bottled water companies control different regions. This may lead to confusion amongst consumers about where they can return their bottles and what supermarkets would accept them. 

While this system may take time to adjust to, it contains built-in incentives that would encourage its use. On a consumer and supermarket level, the incentive of getting money back would motivate consumers to return the bottles to the store or manufacturer. On a manufacturer level, the reduced cost of sterilizing and reusing bottles as opposed to producing more If grocery store chains began implementing a system similar to the German Pfand system, it would likely catch on with consumers and become a regular part of everyday life. 

 

Refrences

Bouliane, Nicolas. “The Pfand System: How to Return Bottles in Germany.” Allaboutberlin.com, 25 Feb. 2021, allaboutberlin.com/guides/pfand-bottles.

Oltermann, Philip. “Has Germany Hit the Jackpot of Recycling? The Jury’s Still Out.” The Guardian, The Guardian, 30 Mar. 2018, www.theguardian.com/world/2018/mar/30/has-germany-hit-the-jackpot-of-recycling-the-jurys-still-out.

Welle (www.dw.com), Deutsche. “How Does Germany’s Bottle Deposit Scheme Work? | DW | 17.11.2021.” DW.COM, 17 Nov. 2021, www.dw.com/en/how-does-germanys-bottle-deposit-scheme-work/a-50923039.

Public Transportation in German, and how can the U.S. learn from it.

Public transportation is an essential component of sustainable mobility and urban development, and Germany is a shining example of how a country can achieve a comprehensive and efficient public transportation system. The German approach to sustainable public transportation is a result of a long-term vision and strategy that involves different levels of government, public and private operators, civil society, and users.

One of the key factors that have contributed to the success of public transportation in Germany is the pricing and taxation policy. The government has imposed high taxes on gasoline and diesel, making driving more expensive and encouraging people to use public transportation or other modes of transport. Furthermore, public transportation fares are relatively low and often subsidized by local authorities, and there are various discounts and incentives for frequent users. These policies have made public transportation affordable and accessible for all, regardless of their socioeconomic status (5).

Germany has also imposed strict emission standards and speed limits for cars, as well as bans or charges for entering certain low-emission zones or city centers. Additionally, parking spaces are limited and costly in many urban areas, which discourages car ownership and use. The government has also invested in modernizing and expanding its public transportation infrastructure and vehicles, using renewable energy sources, digitalization, automation, and electrification. These technological innovations have made public transportation more efficient, reliable, and sustainable (4).

The German approach to public transportation is also characterized by a high level of integration and coordination among different modes of public transportation at the local, regional, and national levels. There are common timetables, ticketing systems, information platforms, and intermodal hubs that allow users to easily switch from one mode to another. This integration and coordination have made public transportation more user-friendly and convenient (3).

Furthermore, Germany has a strong culture of public participation and awareness regarding environmental issues and sustainable mobility. There are various initiatives and campaigns that involve citizens, NGOs, businesses, schools, and media in promoting public transportation as a social good and a lifestyle choice. These participatory and awareness-raising activities have fostered a sense of ownership and responsibility among the public towards public transportation (2).

While the German approach to sustainable public transportation is inspiring, it may not be entirely transferable to a US context. The US faces various barriers and obstacles that prevent or hinder the development and improvement of public transportation. These include geography and demography, culture and preferences, politics and governance, economics and finance, innovation and regulation.

However, this does not mean that the US cannot learn from the German experience and adapt it to its own context. The US already has some examples of successful public transportation systems in some cities or regions, such as New York City or San Francisco. By studying these successful cases and identifying their strengths and weaknesses, the US can formulate a tailored approach to sustainable public transportation that fits its unique circumstances (2).

 

Citation:

Sustainable mode of transport choices at the destination – public transport at German destinations | Emerald Insight. (2018, July 4). Retrieved from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/TR-11-2017-0177/full/html

Puentes, R. (2001, April 27). Move It: How the U.S. Can Improve Transportation Policy. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/move-it-how-the-u-s-can-improve-transportation-policy/

The future of public participation in Germany: Empirical analyses of administration experts’ assessments. (2015, May 12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.04.013

The Local Europe GmbH. (2023, February 22). Explained: What to know about driving in low emissions zones in Germany. The Local Germany. https://www.thelocal.de/20230222/explained-what-to-know-about-driving-in-low-emissions-zones-in-germany

Kirschbaum, L., & Schade, W. (2017). Transport policy planning in Germany – An analysis of political programmes and user costs. European Transport Research Review, 9(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-017-0247-7