Articles Comments

Dickinson to Durban » Archive

Who created the mess? Who’s going to clean it up?

Presently, it has been established by the scientific community that global warming is a global concern, of various degrees of concern to each one of the 7 billion and growing members of the world. This is where the problem of ascribing blame to those who “caused” climate change occurs. So who is responsible for climate change? And who must pay? Bulkeley and Newell argue, almost point blank to their audience, that climate change is caused by the developed countries of the world, such as the United States. However, they also claim that there are many “countries whose emissions trajectories will soon match those of the United States, EU, and Japan.” These countries include China, Brazil, and India, countries whose rapid development, is unfortunately occurring in a time when carbon emissions tied … Read entire article »

Filed under: Climate Change, Environmental Politics

Global Issue in a “Backyard Society”

The causes and effects of climate change can arguably be defined as a clearly global problem, especially when looking at the issue in the context of global governance. Climate change is in fact a global issue in that various groups of people act as the emitters and subsequent victims of climate change in the forms of increasingly extreme weather fluctuations. However, the definition of what is considered “global” is exceedingly difficult to define succinctly and fairly when landed before the ‘global’ audience. Thus, first this sort of definitive explanation of the word must be established before effective work can be done to tackle the issue effectively on the international stage. So what is a “global approach to climate change? The UN has worked very hard to put together a working model … Read entire article »

Filed under: Climate Change, Environmental Politics

Individual Action in A Consumer Society

The question of whether individual action, such as planting a tree can save the world, is one which can still be approached even in the midst of increasing partisan biases towards the term “environmentalism.” Therefore, can we as individuals still contribute to reducing climate change with simple, non political actions as planting a tree?? In the article “Individualization: Plant a Tree, Buy a Bike, Save the world, the author Michael F. Maniates attempts to analyze this question in regards to individuals increasing “green” consumeristic trends of this century, and makes many interesting points. “Think Green”? Ultimately, products like these advertize their “eco-friendliness” more than they actually contribute to the idea. He argues that there is a disconnect between personal acknowledgement of the fact that we as individuals (and therefore consumers) literally “buy” … Read entire article »

Filed under: Conservation

The Media and Manufacturing Doubt?

Have public media and journalists contributed to confusion and doubt about climate change? What can/should they do to present science and scientific debate accurately on this topic? In Merchants of Doubt, considerable writing is done on the role of the media in presenting information or mis-information, really, to the climate change “debate.” The ideas presented by the authors are that 1) all media is politically biased towards one or an other party’s platform and 2) the media tries to devote equal time towards the climate change subject implying to the public that there is still DEBATE about the subject when the authors emphasize that since the 1990s there has been a general scientific consensus that climate change IS occurring and 3) scientific summaries are not written directly by scientists, they are … Read entire article »

Filed under: Summer Reading Responses