Dickinson College, Spring 2025

Author: Evangeline Clausson

Looking Past the Veil

Looking Past the Veil: Finding Katharine Drexel in the Archives

Image of photocopy of 1996 Newspaper article about a display honoring Mother Katharine Drexel with a large black and white picture of the display. It depicts Drexel beside a Native American and a Black American drawn over the shape of the US. In the bottom right corner is a second image of the same display but in color and of a higher resolution.

Main: “Display Opens” The Catholic Witness, L.2001.011.023, CCHS Archives, (Carlisle, PA). Corner: “Mother Katharine Drexel depicted with the Native Americans she was canonized for helping,” Bucks County Courier Times, [WEB].

When you hear “archives” you probably think of a dim room with tables and shelves and filing cabinets. It’s quiet. You can sit there and rummage through boxes of old documents, uncovering their secrets. Often though, a trip to the archives will look more like mine this past last week but wait to judge. Just because the room is bright and you and handed a folder of modern documents, that does not mean there is not something to learn.

I set out to find primary sources related to Katharine Drexel and her work in Carlisle in local archives. I knew that most of Katharine Drexel’s personal documents and correspondence were kept in the Catholic Historical Research Center of the Philadelphia Archdiocese, but I still hoped there might be a document, letter, or something else that she had actually held left in Carlisle having been in possession of St. Patrick’s Church or Father Henry Ganss, with whom she worked closely in Carlisle.[1]

Image of the cover page for the photocopy of "St. Katharine's Hall." The title is written in bold with the subtitle written smaller underneath, followed by a black and white picture of St. Katharine's Hall in Carlisle from 1984

“‘St. Katharine’s Hall’ Title Page,” 973.0497 R684s, Dickinson Archives and Special Collections, Dickinson College Library.

Before coming into the Dickinson Archives, I emailed first to ask if they had any materials related to Katharine Drexel, St. Katharine’s Hall, or anything else connected to the Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament’s presence in Carlisle. The Dickinson Archives focus predominantly on archiving the history of the college, though they also have some materials related to the Carlisle Indian School, so I was hopeful that they might have something related to Drexel.

It wasn’t the primary source I had hoped for, but they did have a photocopy of a 150-page unpublished manuscript, St. Katharine’s Hall: Carlise, Pennsylvania—The Unfolding Apostolate of The Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament 1906-1918, written by Sister M. Georgianna Rockwell of the SBS in the 1980s as an independent research project on the group’s founder.[2]

Preservation can be challenging and expensive. Photocopies mean that more archives can have the same information kept and more cheaply, which is why I could read another photocopy of the same manuscript at the Cumberland County Historical Society [CCHS] two days later, though they don’t have the same feel to them that the original or an actual artifact would.

Three folders, two green, one orange and clear, and a red binder with tags and labels on a brown table

“Folders at CCHS” Katharine Drexel Materials, CCHS

I had a similar experience at the CCHS archives. When I came in for my research appointment, they had pulled the aforementioned manuscript, and three folders of material for me. A cursory glance of the materials told me everything was a photocopy or an original article written between the 1980s-2000s, most of which honored her for being named blessed in 1988 and then sainted in 2000. Many of them had been printed from Newspapers.com, a digital subscription newspaper database, meaning that even as they were not primary sources, they were items I could not have accessed otherwise.

In the whole folder, I only found one document from the early 20th century: a photocopy of a two-paragraph article from The Red Man, the Carlisle Indian School Newspaper, saying that Drexel was visiting Carlisle in 1911. It recounted Drexel’s visit and praised her generosity in financial donations towards Indian Schools across the nation.[3]

Though not from the time of Drexel, other items showed great promise, too. Rockwell’s manuscript was a rare item with a rich bibliography citing letters, church annals, newspapers, etc., and one of the folders had a similar style manuscript titled Used Trumpets: The Letters of Blessed Katharine Drexel SBS and Reverend Doctor Hanry G. Ganss 1892-1912, which largely consisted of transcribed letters from Drexel and Ganss. Obviously for a project like this, the original letters would be preferred, but the information was still valid, and I now had statistics from the school and a sense of Drexel’s voice from the way she wrote in her letters.

Open page of a transcript of Drexel's Letter to the SBS.

“Letter to the SBS,” Katharine Drexel, in “Used Trumpets,” L2013.037.002, CCHS Archives.

“Where do you think your Mother and Mother Mary James are, on this 29th of Jan?” she opens her 1898 letter to her “dear daughters in the Blessed Sacrament.” After answering her own question she continues in a similar style, “Well, why did we go to Carlisle? Let me tell you.” She goes on to explain how and why she came to Carlisle and the prospects of setting up a convent in Carlisle to help educate the Catholic students at the Indian School.[4]  Sister Charlotte, in a 1987 interview, expands upon this warm, bubbly picture of Drexel as a person. Sister Charlotte recounted a time when Drexel’s watch broke before a trip and she opted “to carry a large alarm clock on the train.” Though the sisters eventually persuaded her to borrow a watch instead, the story shows Drexel’s affinity for simplicity and humility.[5]

For this reason that she remarks fondly on how “plain and practical” everything at the Indian School was in her 1898 letter. Specifically, Drexel admits that she “was prepared to see something very grand and was agreeably disappointed” by the plainness.[6] I wonder if she expected something “very grand” because of the government, military, or Protestant influences at the school. Moreover, this comment gives Drexel an air of feistiness that seems so contrary to her occupation. Its easy to imagine a nun being humble, but its harder to imagine a nun being excited, a bit silly, or even a little saucy at times, and yet Drexel feels so much more real in these anecdotes than she does in most of hagiographic or academic sources I looked at before.

A picture of a composite photocopy of a newspaper. It shows a picture of a room in the Convent and a portrait of Mother Katharine surrounded by an article about her and the impact she had on the other sisters.

“Just Two Miracles from Sainthood,” Bucks County Courier Times, photocopy, in Katharine Drexel Collection, L16.0083, CCHS Archives.

My trip to the archives was not what I had expected, and neither was Katharine Drexel. Some part of me wants archives and nuns to remain stuffy and old, but my research would be hollow and sorely lacking if I hadn’t had this experience. After all, learning to move past biases and tell a full story, driven by empathy and curiosity is the job of a historian.[7]

[1] “Archives,” Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament, accessed April 10, 2025, [WEB].

[2] Georgianna Rockwell, “St. Katharine’s Hall Carlisle, Pennsylvania – The Unfolding Apostolate of the Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament – 1906-1918,” 973.0497 R684s, Photocopy of unpublished manuscript, Dickinson Archives and Special Collections, Dickinson College Library

[3] “Mother M. Katharine Drexel Visits Carlisle,” The Red Man, February 1911, vol. 3, no. 6, 307, photocopy, in Katharine Drexel Collection, L16.0083, Cumberland County Historical Society Archives, (Carlisle, PA).

[4] Katharine Drexel to the Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament, 1898, in “Used Trumpets: The Letters of Blessed Katharine Drexel SBS and Reverend Doctor Hanry G. Ganss 1892-1912,” L2013.037.002, Cumberland County Historical Society Archives, (Carlisle, PA): 19-21.

[5] “Mother Drexel: Just Two Miracles Away from Sainthood” Bucks County Courier Times, 2 February 1987, photocopy of excerpt, in Katharine Drexel Collection, L16.0083, Cumberland County Historical Society Archives, (Carlisle, PA).

[6] Drexel to SBS.

[7] Zachary M. Schrag, “Historians’ Ethics.” In The Princeton Guide to Historical Research, (Princeton University Press, NJ, 2021): 24–36, [JSTOR].

Katharine Drexel: Foundress, Philanthropist, and Prisoner?

Katharine Drexel: Founder, Philanthropist, Prisoner?

Portrait of a young Katharine Drexel, with light brown hair, soft features, light eyes (color unclear), large nose, round chin, oval face, clear complexion, white jacket and scarf.

Portrait of a young Katharine Drexel, SBS, [WEB]

Combing through genealogical databases requires a positive attitude, a keen eye, and a sense of humor. The positive attitude is to keep you motivated when information and sources are scarce, of poor quality, or little obvious use; the keen eye is for finding useful and interesting items; and the sense of humor is for maintaining your positive attitude when your mistakes or the inadequacy (or inaccuracy) of sources begins to get you down.
I knew if I wanted to find documents pertaining to Mother (Mary) Katharine Drexel in her youth I would have to use her name prior to her taking vows: Catherine Mary Drexel, which is what I put into Ancestry.com.[1] I tried a few other spelling variations, using vs. omitting her middle name, etc. but many of the results were obituaries behind a paywall from Newspapers.com or false positives: both her names were incredibly common, even just within the Drexel family. It felt like an agonizing game of trial and error for what combination of name spelling and degree of exactness I should search with. Moreover, I didn’t want to limit it to Philadelphia or PA, lest I miss anything from while she was living or visiting elsewhere, though eventually I changed my tune and found greater success.
I took a brief pause and looked at ProQuest and a few other niche databases such as Documenting White Supremacy and its Opponents in the 1920’s, looking for newspaper articles on Drexel, specifically for personal articles, obituaries, etc. My favorite find was her petition to Roosevelt to sign the Anti-Lynching bill, but this and similar items were less suited to this assignment which focuses more on genealogy, though I can still use this in later research, so it’s not a loss.[2]
I should admit that the whole time I was really hoping to find a birth certificate or baptism record to prove her birth name, so that was my focus when I returned to Ancestry. Instead of putting “Catherine Drexel” into the search though, I put in her father’s name, “Francis Anthony Drexel.” Francis’ name should be with hers on censuses until his death, as well as on birth records and so on, but could come up better in searches, so it seemed worth a try. This brought me three more census results, two for 1870 and one for 1880, which had M. Katharine listed as Katie and Catharine. Alas, still no birth record, so I returned to trying variants of Kate and Catherine.

Screenshot of digitized 1930's census on Ancestry. Katharine Drexel's entry is at the top, where the transcription offers "prisoner" for "president" under the "relation to head of household" column.

Drexel, Prisoner, Screenshot by Clausson, 2025, [Ancestry]

Often when these documents get digitized, AI or other programs are used to read the (sometimes hardly legible) handwriting. On the 1930 census, the AI interpreted “President” as “Prisoner”—certainly not the role you would expect for a saintly nun, but a good reminder to not only read the transcripts.[3] Others were more mild, tagging “Catharine” as “Cathaine” or “Drexel” as “Dregel.”[4] Some of these were then manually tagged with “(Mother) Katharine Drexel” but others were not and could have easily been missed without broadening the search to similar results, especially as without misreadings, her name was recorded as Katie, Catharine, Katharine, and Catherine, occasionally with an “M.” added for “Mary.”[5]

Kate M Drexel's 1886 Passport Application. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Birth date: 15 May 1861. Date: 14 July 1886. Age: 25. Stature: 5ft 4in. Forehead: Medium. Eyes: Blue. Nose: Large. Mouth: Medium. Chin: Round. Hair: Light. Complexion: Fair. Face: Oval.

U.S. Passport Application: Kate M Drexel, 1886, National Archives and Records Administration, [Ancestry]

Then I found Kate M Drexel’s passport application. Kate was born May 15th, 1861, three years after Mother Katharine (November 26th, 1858), as per the SBS website.[6] I would have written it off quickly as a relative with a similar name, but attached to it was a note asking for passports for Kate M, Elizabeth L, and Lousie B, the same names and middle initials of the three daughters of Francis A Drexel both as per secondary sources and as in the census records.[7] The application also featured a description of Kate, which seems to match Mother Katharine pretty well, specifically “large” referring to her nose and “round” for her chin.[8] But for this passport to be hers, either the birthdate must be false, or her birthdate elsewhere must be false, which is unlikely as Katharine’s mother died the month following her birth.[9]

Now I really wanted to find a birth certificate. While I thoroughly doubted that her mother’s death was miss recorded or that she was actually the daughter of her father’s second wife, I wanted certainty. Census records show Katharine’s age matching a 1858 birth give or take one year—not three—pointing to a false passport application. Ancestry evidently did not have Katharine’s birth certificate or baptism record. I went back to the Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament website in hopes they had cited something, but all the Archives page had was an announcement that they moved their archives in 2017 to the Catholic Historical Research Center of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia.[10] However, the biography section noted that Francis Drexel married his second wife, Emma Bouvier, in Old St. Joseph’s church.[11] It seemed possible that if they were married there, that Katharine was baptized there, too.

St. Joseph’s website had a similar message to the SBS website, however, it had links to the digitized collections put together by the Archdiocese’ Catholic Historical Research Center and the genealogical research service FindMyPast.[12] Dickinson does not pay for a subscription to this service, but I was able to make a free account, which strictly limited my access, but I was lucky, and my first search brought me directly to the baptism and birth record of Mother Katharine, dating her birth to “Nov 26, 1858.” Though, troublingly, it’s hard to make out if her name is Catharine or Catherine.[13] Still, I am amazed by how far things came from dead ends and false positives to dozens of documents, future research topics, and a genuine excitement to find more. First on my mind is answering why the false birthday on the passport application or was there another Kate M Drexel just three years younger than the Catholic saint going abroad with the saint’s sisters the same year the saint was meeting the Pope in Rome?[14]

Katharine Drexel's Baptism Record. Shows a long list of names, with baptism date, parents' names, birth dates, sponsors, and the name of the minister performing the baptism. Above Drexel's entry, someone has written "Foundress of the Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament for Colored and Indian Missions" and "Mother Katharine Drexel, Died--March 3, 1955."

Baptism Record for Katharine Drexel, Archdiocese of Philadelphia, 1858, [FindMyPast]


[1] “Katharine Drexel,” Wikipedia, March 23, 2025, [WEB].

[2] “Requests that Franklin D. Roosevelt Promote Costigan-Wagner Anti-Lynching Bill.” In Department of Justice Classified Subject Files on Civil Rights, 1914-1949; Department of Justice General Records, Entry 112-B, Straight Numerical Files, #158260, 1934. [ProQuest].

[3] 1930 United States Census, Bensalem, Bucks Country, Pennsylvania, digital image s.v. “M Katherine Dregel,” [Ancestry].

[4] 1880 United States Census, Philadelphia, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania, digital image s.v. “Cathaine Drexel,” [Ancestry]; 1930 US Census.

[5] 1870 United States Census, Philadelphia, Ward 08, District 23, Pennsylvania, digital image s.v. “Katie Drexel,” [Ancestry]; 1870 United States Census, Philadelphia, Ward 08, District 23 (2nd enum), Pennsylvania, digital image s.v. “Catharine Drexel,” [Ancestry]; 1880 US Census.

[6] “St. Katharine Drexel,” Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament, accessed March 27, 2025, [WEB].

[7] “St. Katharine Drexel,” SBS; 1870 US Census; 1870 US Census (2nd enum); 1880 US Census; 1900 United States Census, Bensalem, Bucks Country, Pennsylvania, digital image s.v. “Katharine M Drexel,” [Ancestry]; 1910 United States Census, Bensalem, Bucks Country, Pennsylvania, digital image s.v. “Catharine M Dorexel,” [Ancestry]; 1920 United States Census, Bensalem, Bucks Country, Pennsylvania, digital image s.v. “Mother M Katharine Drexel,” [Ancestry]; 1930 US Census; 1940 United States Census, Bensalem, Bucks Country, Pennsylvania, digital image s.v. “Catherine Dresel,” [Ancestry]; 1950 United States Census, Bensalem, Bucks Country, Pennsylvania, digital image s.v. “Catherine M Drexel,” [Ancestry].

[8] U.S. Passport Applications 1795-1925, July 1886, digital image s.v. “Kate M Drexel,” [Ancestry].

[9] “Hannah Jane Langstroth Drexel,” Find a Grave, accessed March 27, 2025, [WEB]; “St. Katharine Drexel,” SBS.

[10] “Archives,” Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament, accessed March 27, 2025, [WEB].

[11] “St. Katharine Drexel,” SBS.

[12] “Genealogy,” Old Saint Joseph’s Church, 2023, [WEB].

[13] “Philadelphia Roman Catholic Parish Baptisms,” Philadelphia, Philadelphia South, Pennsylvania, 1858, FindMyPast, [FindMyPast].

[14] “St. Katharine Drexel” SBS.

Both a Saint and a Sinner

St. Katharine’s Hall Wayside Marker

Blue wayside marker with white lettering. Inscription: Saint Katharine's Hall 1901-1918 Built by Saint M. Katharine Drexel S.B.S., Philadelphia heiress (1858-1955). Here she conducted a “select free colored school” for black children and served the Carlisle Indian School. She vowed to be “mother and servant of the Indian and Negro races.” Declared Saint on October 1, 2000.

St. Katharine’s Hall Marker, 2025, Clausson

Image depicts two deep red brick buildings. To the left, the Shrine Church, to the right, St. Katharine's Hall. The two are connected by a brick covered walkway.

Shrine Church and St. Katharine’s Hall, 2025, Clausson

It’s a crisp February day, and the sun is finally showing its face again. In the sunlight, it feels almost like spring. A brisk walk from campus, with admittedly a few wrong turns, brought me to St. Katharine’s Hall and the wayside marker in front commemorating the site. Situated beside the old St. Patrick’s Church, now called the Shrine Church, is the hall built at the directive of Katharine Drexel, as a location for teaching the Native Americans at the Carlisle Indian School. [1]

Drexel was born in 1858 as the heir to an incredibly rich and prominent family in Philadelphia. She was raised firmly in the Roman Catholic faith. After her father’s passing in 1885, Drexel and her sisters inherited his $15 million-dollar estate.[2] In 1889, Drexel made her monastic vows, adding the additional vow to be a “mother and servant of the Indian and Negro races” which is quoted on the marker in front of her hall in Carlisle. [3] Using her immense wealth, Drexel traveled about the nation funding, promoting, and teaching at schools for Black and Native American children.[4] St. Katharine’s Hall in Carlisle was one of these schools.

Being far more familiar with the more infamous legacy of the Indian boarding schools, generally hearing about them in the context of phrases like “cultural genocide,” “forced assimilation,” or, worse yet, with Captain Pratt’s quote “kill the Indian and save the man,” I was instantly perturbed by what I saw as benign platitudes on the wayside marker.[5] I immediately painted Drexel as the stereotypical cruel nun, with high standards and harsh punishments, paired with images of Native students being taken from their families and having their hair cut forcibly. Not a pretty picture—nor an accurate one.

Mother (Mary) Katharine Drexel seated at a desk with a pen and paper.

Mother Katharine Drexel, 1941, [S.B.S.]

Drexel was certainly guilty of a “White Savior” bias, believing that she was “saving souls” particularly, she said “‘in the case of a pagan people, [where] the children may carry into the home the lessons of faith and morality’” taught at the schools she funded.[6] For this reason though, she favored building schools on reservations, allowing students to stay with their families. Some Native communities recall her mission sites as “places of abuse and neglect,” while others are considered “models of cooperation and cultural enrichment.”[7] Though none of these schools were nearly so infamously problematic as the Carlisle Industrial school.[8] It is also worth noting that despite the way it sounds from the marker, she did not actually work at the Carlisle Indian School itself, rather at the hall bearing her name where she provided only religious education to specifically the Catholic students at the Indian School, which was otherwise Protestant affiliated.[9] The “Select Free Colored School” and many of her other schools provided academic education primarily with religious and moral education as well.[10]

While some would argue that her bias alone makes her a participant in culturicide, I would argue that she was more so a bystander to the attempted eradication of the Native American culture, having worked so near to schools like the Carlisle Indian School, allowing them to commit abuses. Still, in the 21st century there is a hesitance to honor individuals involved with the Carlisle Indian School or the early 20th century Indian education initiative in general because of the stains of racism and abuse on the initiative as a whole. However, this marker was put up by the Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament—which was founded by St. Katharine—not a government or secular organization, making it seem less out of place.[11]

Blue Marker with gold lettering. Inscription: St. Patrick's Church In 1779, Father Charles Sewall, S.J., took title to a lot here. Log structure built 1784; brick edifice in 1806. Present church erected 1893 by Father Henry G. Ganss. Adjacent is St. Katherine's Hall, built by Mother Katherine Drexel, 1901, for Catholics at Carlisle Indian School. Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission 1986

St. Patrick’s Church Marker, 2009, William Fischer, Jr., [WEB]

Red rectangular marker with beige writing. Inscription: Legends and Lore Hot-Chee Dogs Chili-Cheese hot dogs beloved by locals and first served by Greek immigrant Charles Kollas at the Hamilton Restaurant CA. 1938. he Pennsylvania Center for Folklore - William G. Pomeroy Foundation 2021 marker #101

Hot-Chee Dogs Marker, 2021, Shane Oliver, [WEB]

The marker looks remarkably similar to those put up by the Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, though. (See the image of St. Patrick’s Church marker for reference.)[12] Both are dark blue, rectangular, with a flourish at the top, etc. The one for St. Katharine’s Hall has a different insignia on top, though, because it is not a state ordained marker, as those by the Commission are. Other historical markers in Carlisle that aren’t put up by the state come in different colors or shapes to differentiate themselves, such as the “Hot-Chee Dogs” marker by the Hamilton Restaurant.[13] The marker for St. Katharine’s Hall seems to be attempting to emulate the official historical markers, as though by doing so it presents itself with greater authority and importance.

It may seem that up to this point, I have neglected Drexel’s service to the African American community as noted on the marker. That is because I wanted to end on a wholly positive note. This marker clearly wanted to remember the good work that Drexel did in her life. It instantly led me to skepticism because of its proximity to and mention of the infamous Indian School. While her involvement with Indian schools is checkered, her work with the African American community could be called patronizing at the worst. She stood up for anti-lynching bills, fought against racial profiling, and she educated Black youths without expecting their conversion to Catholicism in return. Being positioned across the street from Carlisle’s historic Bethel African Methodist Episcopal (A.M.E.) Church, it’s a pity the marker didn’t give greater emphasis on Drexel’s egalitarian work.[14]

Coming at the marker with so much historical, emotional baggage, I felt that the wording of the marker was trying to praise someone with their flowery vow to conceal the reality of their work. Whereas, in reality, the marker’s use of her monastic vow is problematic for an entirely different reason: the vow was spoken before she had actually done the service to the Black and Native American communities, so it fails to really convey the full depth of her service. I wish instead it spoke plainly to her devotion to education and equality, admitting where at times it was misguided but using that to emphasize her opinions on equality that were actually quite progressive at the time. Ironically, a more secular and nuanced marker would paint Drexel as more of a saint than the current one because readers would find it more believable and be able to more fully honor and commemorate her for the truly impressive human that she was.

 

[1] “About Us—St. Patrick Church,” St. Patrick Church, Carlisle, last modified 2020, accessed February 28, 2025, [WEB]; Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament (S.B.S.), “St. Katharine’s Hall,” marker (Carlisle, PA).

[2] Amanda Bresie, “Mother Katharine Drexel’s Benevolent Empire: The Bureau of Catholic Indian Missions and the Education of Native Americans, 1885–1935,” in Remapping the History of Catholicism in the United States, ed. David J. Endres, Catholic University of America Press, 2017), 72,  [JSTOR]; “St. Katharine Drexel,” Sisters of the Blessed Sacrament, accessed March 2, 2025, [WEB].  

[3] Rachel Bulman, “‘Think It, Desire It, Speak It, Act It’: St. Katharine Drexel on Racial Equality,” Word on Fire, March 3, 2021, [WEB]; S.B.S., “St. Katharine’s Hall”

[4] Bresie, “Mother Katharine Drexel’s Benevolent Empire,” 71-94; Bulman, “‘Think it, Desire It, Speak It, Act It’”

[5] Arnold Krupat, “Introduction,” in Boarding School Voices: Carlisle Indian School Students Speak, (University of Nebraska Press, 2021) xiv-xv, [JSTOR].

[6] Bresie, “Mother Katharine Drexel’s Benevolent Empire,” 92.

[7] Bresie, “Mother Katharine Drexel’s Benevolent Empire,” 93-94.

[8] Krupat, “Introduction,” xiii-xxx.

[9] Amanda West, “St. Patrick Church and the Indian School” Dickinson College Wiki, last modified December 13, 2007, 00:18 [WEB].

[10] Elisabeth Davis, “‘Our Colored and Indian Charges Furnish So Much Amusement for Us’: Catholicism, Assimilation, and the Racial Hierarchy in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, 1883–1918,” Pennsylvania History: A Journal of Mid-Atlantic Studies 91, no. 1 (2024): 47–64. [Scholarly Publishing Collective]

[11] S.B.S., “St. Katharine’s Hall”

[12] Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Comission, “St. Patrick’s Church” marker, Carlisle, PA, 1986.

[13] Shane Oliver, “Hot-Chee Dogs,” Historical Marker Database, last updated July 12, 2022, updated by Carl Gordon Moore Jr., [WEB].

[14] Bulman, “‘Think It, Desire It, Speak It, Act It’; Davis, “‘Our Colored and Indian Charges’”; For more on the Bethel A.M.E. Church’s history see “200 Years of History” Bethel AME Carlisle, 2025, [WEB].

The Value(s) of Book Reviews

Cover of The Journal of American History Vol. 104 No. 4

Image: Journal of American History, Evangeline Clausson, 2025

If you’ve never found yourself immersed in the world of academic book reviews, you would probably assume that they are all boring, apathetic, criticisms of other boring, apathetic volumes. I was apt to think the same at first, but after reading more than fifty reviews from The Journal of American History (March 2018), I realize that they have a style of their own and forcing upon them the expectations of pop culture reviews is not only unfair but also misses the nuance and elegance of the academic historian’s book review.

 

Top: A pie chart showing the distribution of reviewer's general take on the books: 82% positive or mostly positive, 10% mostly negative, and 8% mixed or unclearBottom: A bar graph showing the distribution of compliments and criticisms based on the reviewer's general take on the book. Positive: 22 overtly compliments, 1 gives some form of criticism, 16 both, and 2 neither. Negative: 4 criticism, 1 both. Mixed or unclear: 3 both, 1 neither.

Charts, Clausson, 2025

Firstly, not all of the reviews are negative. In fact, most are positive. Eighty-two percent of the reviews I looked at for this project were positive or at least mostly positive. This is not to say that they aren’t critical in some way: twenty-two percent of reviews criticized the writing and thirty-eight percent pointed out a gap in the historical narrative of the book in question. Roughly two-thirds of the reviews with either or both forms of negative criticism were still overall positive reviews. Often the reviewers use the criticism to emphasize how impressive another aspect of the work is. One reviewer noted that a work had “more typographical errors than a reader can ignore, but [that] it has much to teach about the New Negro movement.”[1] To say a work “has much to teach” seems kind, but bland. To say a work is a typographical mess but is still more than worth reading is far higher praise and better prepares the audience for what they are about to encounter.

As for apathy: I heartily deny its existence. I thought the tone was cold, until I came to John Milton Cooper Jr.’s review of James D. Startt’s Woodrow Wilson, the Great War, and the Fourth Estate (2017). In the final paragraph he says “Definitive is a word historians usually avoid, but it characterizes this book better than any other.”[2] Definitive is not a word you would likely use to describe your favorite book or movie, certainly not a word you would use to compliment a friend, a good meal, or most things you generally find yourself applauding. For Cooper, though, he is bestowing some of the most incredible praise. He is saying that the book addresses all the relevant topics, is well researched and well written, draws appropriate conclusions, and overall contains all the information one wants or needs on that topic. Definitive doesn’t sound warm and fuzzy, but in context, it is the warmest praise possible.

Zoom in on the last paragraph of Cooper's review of Woodrow Wilson

Image: “Definitive,” Clausson, 2025

With that realization, I looked back at the other compliments and commentaries.  Compliments were seldom about how interesting a volume or topic was, with only twelve percent calling something interesting, or more often “fascinating,” despite eighty percent of reviews giving some form of praise.[3] Most compliments emphasized what the author did that was impressive be it “…meticulous and revelatory archival work,” or writing in an “enticing” or “accessible” style.[4] In the same way critiques focus on what the authors neglected, such as paying “inadequate attention to racial differences” or leaving questions unanswered.[5]

From this we see what reviewers value. Different reviewers prefer different styles of writing; different books have different goals. However, all historians share certain values as they recognize the effort that goes into research and writing and the importance of accuracy and honesty in these endeavors. In The Princeton Guide to Historical Research (2021), Zachary Schrag identifies these values as curiosity, accuracy, judgement, empathy, gratitude, and truth.[6]

These values are why reviewers write reviews with the book open in front of them, taking the time to quote the authors and often other scholarship on the same topic as well. Its why reviewers don’t write streams of accolades for the books, even when they really enjoyed reading them: they want to describe what the author did and let that stand as praise in and of itself. A good volume of history answers questions and brings to light new information and understanding—it strives to be definitive, to analyze all the aspects of a topic with the evidence to support that analysis. When a volume cannot be definitive, it seeks to build a strong foundation for future research or to add new perspectives to a topic that has yet to be fully fleshed out.[7] Reviews outline a volume’s success in this endeavor. The reviewer acknowledges the work of previous historians and shows where this work diverges and treads new ground. They show why the work is worth reading by showing the curiosity of its author, the accuracy of their research, the truths they bring to light. What looks like just a two-page summary can just as easily be read as a two-page list of achievements. That hardly sounds cold or apathetic.

So now I have only “boring” to disprove. Unfortunately, “boring,” being subjective, is difficult to disprove. Book reviews have a specific purpose: to describe a book and what it’s about, what it does, who it’s for, how it’s written, etc. The reviews are most often written by and for academics. They are meant to be informative, not entertaining, so, no, they are not particularly riveting, but that does not necessarily make them “boring.” It just means that they should be read in context.

If you were looking for a good book on equal rights and the Declaration of independence, the title and Michal Yan Rozbicki’s first line on Richard D. Brown’s Self-Evident Truths (2017) would tell you plenty: it “is a rewarding volume—carefully written, balanced, and well documented.”[8] However, if you stopped there, you would never know how passionate and excited about the book Rozbicki really was. You would miss the way he describes the arguments of the work and highlights the complexities within it—the subtlety with which one historian tips his hat to another, recognizing his colleague’s hard work. You would miss the real art of a book review.

Evangeline Clausson, 2/10/2025

[1] Koritha Mitchell, review of Colored No More: Reinventing Black Womanhood in Washington, D.C. by Treva B. Lindsey, Journal of American History 104, no. 4 (March 2018): 1031.

[2] John Milton Cooper Jr., review of Woodrow Wilson, the Great War, and the Fourth Estate by James D. Startt, Journal of American History 104, no. 4 (March 2018): 1050-1.

[3] Ashley Carse, review of Water: Abundance, Scarcity, and Security in the Age of Humanity by Jeremy J. Schmidt, Journal of American History 104, no. 4 (March 2018): 995.

Mitchell, review of Colored No More, 1031.

[4] Kimberly Johnson, review of States of Dependency: Welfare, Rights, and American Governance, 1935-1972 by Karen Tani, Journal of American History 104, no. 4 (March 2018): 1082.

Etsuko Taketani, review of Strange Fruit of the Black Pacific: Imperialism’s Racial Justice and Its Fugitives by Vince Schleitwiler, Journal of American History 104, no. 4 (March 2018): 1045-6.

Lane Demas, review of Separate Games: African American Sport behind the Walls of Segregation, Ed. by David K. Wiggins and Ryan A. Swanson, Journal of American History 104, no. 4 (March 2018): 1054-5.

[5] Sarah E. Chinn, review of Get Out of My Room! A History of Teen Bedrooms in America by Jason Reid, Journal of American History 104, no. 4 (March 2018): 1041-2.

Anders Stephanson, review of Understanding and Teaching the Cold War Ed. by Matthew Masur, Journal of American History 104, no. 4 (March 2018): 994.

[6] Zachary M. Schrag, The Princeton Guide to Historical Research (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2021), 24-36. [JSTOR].

[7] Schrag, Princeton Guide: 90-1 [JSTOR].

[8] Michal Jan Rozbicki, review of Self-Evident Truths: Contesting Equal Rights from the Revolution to the Civil War by Richard D. Brown, Journal of American History 104, no. 4 (March 2018): 1014.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén