Dickinson College Food Studies Certificate Program

Waste To Energy: Where does our food go after disposal?

Introduction

Do you ever think about what happens to our food after we throw it away? I didn’t either. I assumed it just went to the dump and sat there. It’s food, so how bad could it be for the environment? As it turns out, food waste in landfills releases a greenhouse gas called methane, that traps heat in our atmosphere far more efficiently than carbon dioxide (EESI, n.d.). This makes reducing it an important part in fighting climate change. One cleaner way to deal with this food waste is a biodigester, and Dickinson College has one right on its farm.

What is a Biodigester?

A biodigester, also called an Anaerobic Digester, is a system that converts food and other organic waste into energy.  Food, crop, and animal waste is crushed, mixed with water, and  pumped into a sealed container devoid of oxygen. In this tank, microbes break the waste down and it produces three outputs, Biogas, Digestate, and pulp.

Biogas is used to produce immediate energy like electricity and heat. It can also be upgraded to a renewable natural gas (RNG) called biomethane that can fuel cars and be used in the natural gas network (EESI, n.d).

Digestate is the liquid  produced from the anaerobic digestion, and can be used as fertilizer.

Pulp is the pressed fibers that can be used as bedding for livestock and as soil amendments (Steiman, M. 2026).

Figure 1

Figure 2

Note. Figure 1 Illustrates a biodigester system, and its inputs and outputs (EESI, n.d).

What does it look like at Dickinson?

The biodigester at the Dickinson farm sits near the dairy cows, and what makes it unique is their partnership, not only with the dairy farm next door but also with local businesses. The farm takes around 41 bins a day from our cafeteria, plus waste from a few local restaurants, and from the dairy farm.

During our class trip to the farm Matt Steiman told us that the biodigester eats around 3,000 to 4,000 gallons of waste a day, and from that they make over 500 cubic meters of gas daily.  That’s enough to  power the farm and the digester itself, as well as 10 to 15 additional homes in Carlisle. The digester also creates a large amount of fertilizer that is used by both the Dickinson farm and the Dairy farm, and both use the pulp as cow bedding and in planting soil.  The system is currently saving the farm around $11,000 a year, and that number is expected to grow in the future. (M. Steiman, personal communication, 2026).

Figure 2

Note. Figure 2 illustrates the food processor at the Dickinson College Farm

What are its benefits and drawbacks?

Benefits: Biodigesters have many benefits.  Keeping this anaerobic process within a sealed container captures the methane emissions produced by the breakdown process that would otherwise escape into the air, and is able to be turned into energy reducing the need to use other fossil fuels. Steiman also pointed out on our trip to the farm that a biodigester may cost more to set up, but it saves thousands of dollars yearly on power.

Drawbacks: Although there are many benefits, no system is perfect. Digesters are expensive to build, and need maintenance when clogged by plastic packaging or metal utensils. They also need a steady waste supply to produce energy.

Biogas on a smaller scale: Home-scale biogas systems also can have a very positive affect on women in developing countries. In his article, Steiman (2020) explores the benefits and barriers of Home-scale biogas systems. He mentions that in developing countries, tasks are usually assigned based on gender lines. Some benefits he describes  include reduced smoke inhalation/respiratory issues, reduced physical labor, additional free time for education and social activities, employment opportunities, more participation of men in cooking.  Some barriers include more time spent finding water in areas where water is scarce, men usually have final say in whether or not the system is adopted and could be denied, promotion may not reach where it needs to, women may be restricted on participation, and more time may be spent on maintenance.

Figure 3

Note. Figure 3 illustrates a home biogas system in Israel, producing gas used for cooking

Takeaways

After our class readings and the farm visit, I think the biodigester is really cool and has many advantages. However it got me thinking. The only reason we need systems like this is because we produce so much food waste.  Some of it is damaged food, some is leftovers from our plates, and a lot is food that could still be consumed. The biodigester is a system that helps us manage the waste, but each day we produce more and more.  We could install many more of these systems all over the world, yet they would not be able to keep up. I think the bigger problem we need to look at is why do we produce so much food waste, and how can we minimize it.  41 bins of waste a day, just from our cafeteria, shows that we could be making small adjustments to our lives and eating habits to help reduce waste.

Questions to think about

After everything considered, I leave you with a few questions:

Is it enough for individuals to waste less, or does the food system itself need to change?

If a biodigester makes food waste useful, does that reduce the pressure to prevent waste in the first place?

Should colleges and restaurants track and publicly share their food waste numbers?

Who should pay for systems like this, the ones implementing the system, local governments, or the businesses that produce the waste?

What’s stopping more communities from adopting these systems?

References:

Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI). (n.d.-a). Fact sheet: Biogas: Converting waste to energy. EESI.  https://www.eesi.org/papers/view/fact-sheet-biogasconverting-waste-to-energy

Gruber, P.  pgruber@lancasterfarming. com. (2026, June 16). Dickinson College Farm’s new methane digester shows benefits. Lancaster Farming. https://www.lancasterfarming.com/farming-news/conservation/dickinson-college-farm-s-new-methane-digester-shows-benefits/article_98d54a56-5b89-421e-a48f-2d4a9aa02cf3.html

Poulet, M. (2016, August 22). Israeli company converts food waste to cooking gas. The Observers – France 24. https://observers.france24.com/en/20160812-israeli-inventor-converts-food-waste-cooking-gas

Steiman, M. (2020, summer). Women and Home-Scale Biogas: Benefits, Barriers and Insights from US-based Innovators. 

Steiman, M. (2026, October 15) Personal communication, visit to the college farm

1 Comment

  1. Alex Arnold

    The College Farm’s biogas project is something that has defined my time at Dickinson. In fact, during my very first week at Dickinson in the fall of 2023, I traveled to the farm while the digester was still being built; I witnessed the insulation being added around the main digester tank. Since then, I’ve helped deliver tons of food waste into the digester as a student worker and even had the chance to drum in the biogas musical which took place in fall of 2024. So, I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about food waste and biogas. Your question pondering the potentially paradoxical relationship between biodigesters and food waste is one that has troubled me for quite some time. While the biodigester provides an opportunity to divert food waste from the landfill, it is dependent on a constant stream of bio-waste to produce methane gas and, ultimately, energy. This is made more complicated when we consider the great investment made to create the project. It’s not just that the digester requires food waste to create energy, but that the financial return from the energy is something that is being counted on to make the project successful and eventually profitable. One troubling way of framing this is to say “the farm requires that we, as a campus and larger Cumberland Valley community, continue to produce enough food waste for the lifespan of the biodigester to make the project financially viable.” When considering the EPA’s food waste hierarchy, as referenced in the NRDC’s Wasted report, such a framing of the biodigester project seems incongruent with the ultimate goal of wasting less food. My interpretation of the role of Dickinson’s biogas project, after quite a bit of thought, has shifted from this murky framing. Instead, my framing of the project is something for like this: “We acknowledge that food waste reduction through various efforts such as donation, better storage, etc. is important. We also acknowledge that, regardless of our efforts to prevent food from becoming waste, there will always be some residual organic waste that needs to be disposed of and that there should exist a sustainable pathway for the management of this organic waste.” I choose to see the digester in this light. Systemic change resulting in a dramatic decrease of food waste is not something that is likely to happen overnight. In the meantime and for all of the time in which we continue to generate at least some amount of food waste, we need a way to dispose of this waste which reduces its environmental cost. This understanding leads me to two conclusions regarding biodigesters: 1) that biodigesters are not and should not be in competition with other initiatives targeted at reducing food waste altogether, rather they serve a purpose within a larger food waste reduction framework and 2) biodigesters are useful for obtaining benefits from food which cannot be diverted from the waste stream while minimizing the negative environmental impacts of said waste.

Leave a Reply

© 2026 Food Studies


Academic Technology services: GIS | Media Center | Language Exchange

Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑