Dickinson College Food Studies Certificate Program

Category: Food Studies Fall 2026

Inequity and Access in the Food System

Introduction to Food Access and Food Security

Food insecurity is not contained to the most-populous 50 US cities. But, in 2024, the number of food insecure individuals across the country totaled just shy of their equivalent, roughly 48 million people or just over 13% of the population (United States Department of Agriculture [USDA], 2026c). While by no means geographically confined, rates of food insecurity are higher than average in southern states, rural areas, and highly urbanized settings (USDA, 2026c). 

Figure 1 

Note. Figure 1 displays a color-coded map of the United States, visualizing comparative rates of food security in US states between 2022 and 2024 (USDA, 2025c). 

Defining Food Security 

The USDA defines food security as having “no problems, or anxiety about, consistently accessing adequate food” (2026d). Low food security, on the other hand, does not necessarily mean eating less, but often involves supplementing diets with low-cost, low-quality food. Very low food security applies when “eating patterns of one or more household members were disrupted and food intake was reduced” (USDA, 2026d). Food security is not static; a household’s status can shift as prices, income, or living situations change (Halpin, 2026).  

Figure 2

 

Note. Figure 2 depicts a chart reflecting the number of US households facing low food security (8.3%) and very low food security (5.4%) (USDA, 2025c). 

Food Access and Hunger 

We tend to closely associate food access with “hunger”. Yet, in 2006, the US Department of Agriculture ceased using the term “hunger”, instead opting for  “very low food security” (Allen, 2007; Fisher, 2017). The rationale: hunger, the physical sensation, is difficult to measure and that what surveys account for is, in the end, merely household food security (USDA, 2026d). The decision was met with disdain from food access advocates who feared the decision would cause “hunger disappear from the public agenda” (Allen, 2007, pg. 22).  

Some are more skeptical about hunger-focused language, however. Food-justice advocate, Andrew Fisher, points out in his 2017 book, Big Hunger, the shortcomings associated with focusing on “hunger” in isolation. A key issue with a hunger-centric approach is that the underlying social and economic problems are swept away. Thus, we fail to “to establish […] financial, human, or social capital needed to eliminate the problem on a more permanent basis” (Fisher, 2017, pg. 21). 

Responding to Food Insecurity 

One pathway for mitigating food insecurity is through government assistance. In 2025, the largest governmental nutrition assistance program, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), formerly known as food stamps, served around 42.1 million low-income Americans (USDA, 2026e).

A second avenue which supplements government assistance in the alleviation of food insecurity is referred to as the “charitable food distribution network” (Fisher, 2017, pg. 24). In other words, organizations that work to reduce food insecurity through donations and private funding. 

Even with government assistance, there exists a need for secondary food assistance pathways. This is, in part, due to barriers in accessing government programs like SNAP, such as the strenuous paperwork and work requirements mandated to qualify (Wilkerson et al., 2018). The passage of One Big Beautiful Bill in July 2025 made requirements even stricter and barred asylum seekers, refugees, and select other migrant groups from receiving SNAP funding (Hodges and Jones, 2026, pp. 8-9).  

Food Assistance Close to Home

On a local scale, Project SHARE and Feed Carlisle, PA are examples of charitable organizations that help bridge the gap between governmental assistance and food security in Cumberland County. Established in 1984, Project SHARE has evolved from food pantry to advocacy organization and community education center (Project SHARE, n.d.). More recently, Feed Carlisle, PA has contributed to the expansion of Carlisle’s food access network by introducing the community fridge and pantry at the Bosler Memorial Library. The idea behind the community pantry is to provide a universal and barrier-free means of accessing food for those struggling to afford groceries, supported directly by donations from community members (Feed Carlisle, PA, n.d.).

Figure 3 

Note. Figure 3 shows the community fridge and pantry located in the Bosler Memorial Library in Carlisle, PA, supported by the Feed Carlisle, PA organization (Photo by author). 

 

 

 

The above-mentioned governmental and charitable interventions to food insecurity are examples of what Fisher calls hunger-focused solutions. What strategies or initiatives do you think could play a role in reducing food insecurity altogether? 

Returning to a localized perspective, what do you think your role as a community member should be in addressing challenges to food access?  Where do you see opportunities to improve food access in Carlisle or in your home community?

Citations

Allen, P. (2007). The Disappearance of Hunger in America. Gastronomica, 19–23. 

Feed Carlisle, PA. (n.d.). Retrieved September 25, 2026, from https://www.feedcarlislepa.org 

Fisher, A. (2017). Big Hunger: The Unholy Alliance Between Corporate America and Anti-Hunger Groups. MIT Press. 

Halpin, J. (2026, September 21). Food Access. FDST 201; Introduction to Food Studies. 

Hodges, L., & Jones, J. W. (2026). The Food and Nutrition Assistance Landscape: Fiscal Year 2025 Annual Report (EIB-304). United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 

Project SHARE. (n.d.). Our History. Project SHARE. Retrieved September 25, 2026, from https://www.projectsharepa.org/history/ 

United States Department of Agriculture. (2026a). A Short History of SNAP. United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Administration. Retrieved September 23, 2026, from https://www.fna.usda.gov/snap/history 

United States Department of Agriculture. (2026b). Food Security in the U.S. – History & Background. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. Retrieved September 22, 2026, from https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-us/history-background 

United States Department of Agriculture. (2026c). Food Security in the U.S. – Key Statistics & Graphics. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-us/key-statistics-graphics 

United States Department of Agriculture. (2026d). Food Security in the U.S. – Measurement | Economic Research Service. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-us/measurement 

United States Department of Agriculture. (2026e). Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap 

United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. (2025). Prevelance of food insecurity, average 2022-2024 [Map]. https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-us/key-statistics-graphics 

Wilkerson, R., Krey, K., & English, L. (2018). The Complex Challenges to Participation in Federal Nutrition Programs. In L. H. Hossfeld, E. B. Kelly, & J. F. Waity (Eds.), Food and Poverty: Food Insecurity and Food Sovereignty among America’s Poor (pp. 114–125). Vanderbilt University Press.  

Models of Food Production

Fig. 1. Monocultural potato field. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoculture.

Picture a farm. What comes to mind? Rows on rows of corn, barns full of chickens, all sprawling over acres of clear-cut land? This is the dominant approach to agriculture, known as capital intensive farming, which involves using nature for human needs on large-scale farms (Halpin, 2026). This approach typically involves converting natural habitat to agricultural land, thereby displacing native species and causing biodiversity loss (Halpin, 2026; Nath & O’Reilly, 2016; Owino et al, 2022). These losses are exacerbated by the monoculture method of growing crops, meaning a single crop is grown at a time (Nath & O’Reilly, 2016). Finally, this model of food production relies on synthetic inputs, such as pesticides, to successfully grow crops (Halpin, 2026). Any problems that arise are solved with a science and technology-forward approach (Halpin, 2026). The goal is standardization, efficiency, and mass production, and it is driven by business interests (Habib, 2025).

However dominant this food production model might be, it is not sufficient for meeting the nutritional needs of our growing human population. 690 million people went hungry in 2022, and this number will rise to more than 840 million by the end of the decade (Owino et al, 2022). Furthermore, as climate change progresses and the amount of CO2 in our atmosphere increases, plant protein and micronutrient contents will continue to drop, resulting in poorer nutritional values (Owino et al, 2022). So, in the face of these issues, what can be done?

Fortunately, there are already alternative models of food production that treat farms as ecosystems and nature as more than just for human use (Halpin, 2026). Alternative models of food production involve using more, smaller farms instead of few large farms, and limiting growth on the whole (Halpin, 2026). Polyculture, which involves multiple types of crops in the same space so they can form interrelationships, replaces monoculture (Frey & Czolba, 2017; Halpin, 2026). This also means using fewer to no synthetic inputs, as well as less technology and energy intensive farming methods (Halpin, 2026). This results in farms that are more sustainable and resilient, soil that is healthier and with higher moisture and carbon retention, and a lower agricultural environmental impact on the whole (Halpin, 2026).

Fig. 2. Food forest. Hobby Farms. www.hobbyfarms.com/permaculture-food-forest-farm/.

So, what do alternative models of food production actually look like in practice? One example is the food forest, a system that was and still is used in many Indigenous communities worldwide (Frey & Czolba, 2017). Food forests are a type of polyculture that mimics a natural forest system, except that the plants are deliberately chosen as continual food sources for humans (Frey & Czolba, 2017). With careful cultivation, food forests can produce food all year round, as different plants come in and out of season (Frey & Czolba, 2017).

Fig 3. An indoor small scale hydroponic system. Terrascope. https://terrascope2024.mit.edu/?page_id=312.

Another alternative to conventional agriculture bypasses the issue of poor soil health altogether. Soil-less agriculture, including techniques such hydroponics, aquaponics, and aeroponics, reduces the need for pesticides and inputs, thereby reducing many of the environmental harms involved in agriculture (Habib, 2025; Terrascope, 2024). These types of farms can be constructed vertically and are “stackable,” so they take up less space than conventional farms (Habib, 2025; Terrascope, 2024). Like food forests, they are capable of producing food year-round (Habib, 2025). In my opinion, this makes soil-less agriculture uniquely suited to urban areas that could not ordinarily support agriculture, helping to shorten food chains and provide food security.

What models of alternative agriculture do you find the most intriguing? Where do you see potential for improving models of food production? Are there any drawbacks to alternative agriculture as compared to conventional agriculture, and how can we overcome them?

 

References

Frey, D. & Czolba, M. (2017). The Food Forest Handbook: Design and Manage a Home-Scale Perennial Polyculture Garden. New Society Publishers. https://research.ebsco.com/c/rd5flh/ebook-viewer/pdf/adbxc6enhr/page/pp_v.

Habib, M., Singh, S., Jan, S., Jan, K., & Bashir, K. (2025). The future of the future foods: understandings from the past towards SDG-2. NPJ. file:///C:/Users/iphec/Downloads/The%20future%20of%20future%20foods_understandings%20from%20the%20past…-1.pdf.

Halpin, J. Personal communication [lecture], September 10, 2026.

Nath, T.K. & O’Reilly, P. (Eds.) (2016). Monoculture Farming: Global Practices, Ecological Impact and Benefits/Drawbacks. Nova. https://research.ebsco.com/c/rd5flh/ebook-viewer/pdf/vemm43pem5/page/pp_ii.

Owino, V., Kumwenda, C., Ekesa, B., Parker, M.E., Ewoldt, L., Roos, N., Lee, W.T., & Tome, D. (2022). The impact of climate change on food systems, diet quality, nutrition, and health outcomes: A narrative review. Frontiers. https://courses.dickinson.edu/d2l/le/lessons/13187/topics/184293.

Terrascope. (2024). Alternative Agriculture: Definition and Overview. MIT. https://terrascope2024.mit.edu/?page_id=312.

EXAMPLE FOR TECH TRAINING: Why Food Is More Than Just Something We Eat

Food is part of everyday life, but it can also tell us a lot about people, communities, and cultures. The study of food can include topics such as agriculture, nutrition, traditions, economics, sustainability, and access to food. A strong blog post should go beyond simply summarizing information and should include your own thoughts and reactions to the topic.

For example, a student might discuss how their understanding of a particular food-related issue changed after a class discussion or reading. They could then connect that idea to an outside source. According to Author (2026), food choices can be influenced by factors such as cost, culture, availability, and personal preference. This is where you would include an APA-style in-text citation.

Adding Images

Figure 1. Example caption explaining what the image shows and why it relates to the topic. Image credit: Photographer/Organization.

Images should not simply decorate the post. They should help the reader understand or think about the topic in a different way.

You can also use headings to break up longer posts and make them easier to read online.

Connecting the Topic to Your Own Experience

A blog post should also include some personal reflection. For example:

Growing up, I never thought much about where the food in a grocery store came from. Learning more about food production made me realize how many people and processes are involved before a product ever reaches the shelf.

Notice that this example connects a personal observation to the larger topic rather than simply saying, “I thought the reading was interesting.”

Figure 2. A second image related to the topic. Image credit: Photographer/Organization.

Questions for Readers

End your post with questions that encourage classmates to respond with more than a simple yes or no.

  1. What factors have the greatest influence on the foods you choose?
  2. Has learning more about a food-related issue ever changed the way you eat or shop?
  3. What part of our food system do you think deserves more attention?

References

Author, A. A. (2026). Title of article or webpage. Website or Publication Name. URL

Author, B. B. (2025). Title of article. Journal Name, 10(2), 20–30.

Organization Name. (2026). Title of webpage. URL

© 2026 Food Studies


Academic Technology services: GIS | Media Center | Language Exchange

Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑