Mussolini’s Failed Foreign Policy

Mussolini the Duce was over-confident in his abilities as the Fascist leader of Italy. By aligning with Germany, Mussolini greatly over-estimated both the role of Italy in the European power play and in his foreign policy negotiating ability. In his article “Fascist Diplomacy and Fascist War”, Clark asserts that Mussolini was “no diplomat, and seemed incapable of taking a long-term view.” (( Clark, Martin. “Chapter 14 – Fascist Diplomacy and Fascist War.” In Modern Italy 1871-1995, 280-300. 2nd ed. London and New York: Longman, 1996. (p. 280) )) Especially in comparison with Hitler and Stalin, who both were willing to sacrifice short-term public opinion for calculated long-term state-building, Mussolini and his sought after Roman revival come across as the weakest of the European powers in both the diplomatic and militaristic aspect of foreign policy.

Clark explains how Mussolini lost both the British and French as allies after competing with them over East African colonial territories. (( Clark, Fascist Diplomacy, p. 282 )) However, attempting to create a Rome-Berlin axis and seeking an ally out of Hitler proved to be his ultimate downfall. The Duce naively believed he could control Hitler and negotiate with him. When he successfully prevented Hitler’s initial invasion of Czechslovakia 1938, he blindly believed he had “single-handily avoided a world war”. (( Clark, Fascist Diplomacy, p. 283)) However, Hitler invaded Czechslovakia in 1939 despite Mussolini’s wishes. Hitler was no ally to Mussolini in the war at all.  Hitler’s interests were German interests and German interests alone. Mussolini did not realize the extent of Hitler’s nationalist and expansionist self-concerned goals until he invaded Poland and after that Denmark and Norway. ((Clark, Fascist Diplomacy, p. 284))  When world war finally did break out, Mussolini believed it would be a short-lived. The other dominating European powers were much more advanced than Italy in politics and military might, but Mussolini’s Fascist aims would not allow him to remain neutral. “His whole past, his whole propaganda, his whole regime had glorified war. Now there was one, and he had to join in.” (( Clark, Fascist Diplomacy, p. 285)) Therefore, in a further attempt to revive Roman greatness and power, Mussolini refused to sit idly by. He wanted to be remembered as a competitor and sought after power in anyway possible.

It was all in vain because the Italy army lacked morale, equipment, rations, transportation, and most other necessary supplies. This left Italy in a position of desperate dependence, forced to rely on ally Germany, who did not have much to spare because the German war effort was clearly the priority on the Eastern Front. The unsuccessful Italian war effort created an extremely unfavorable view of the Fascist party and Mussolini in his native Italy. Clark summarizes, “The party not only failed to boost morale, but positively lowered it. … Thus the party disintegrated from within.” ((Clark, Fascist Diplomacy, p. 292)) War for wars sake was not the answer for Mussolini. Do you believe the Fascist party would have retained a more favorable view domestically if Mussolini had not taken a side-line position in WWII and did not attempt to join alliances with Germany in the war?

3 thoughts on “Mussolini’s Failed Foreign Policy

  1. I think in answering this question it is important to recall domestically who considered themselves truly Fascist. As we’ve read in previous classes, the lack of a clear definition of Fascism in Italy caused a lot of problems. People called themselves “fascist” but often at times for personal gain. I think ideologically speaking taking a side-line position in WWII and not joining with Germany in the war would’ve been critiqued by “true” Fascists who glorified war. However, pragmatically speaking the article gave the impression that most people (because they did not identify as fascists in the Mussolini sense) had no desire to participate in a war, and that many were fighting for ideals they knew very little of.

  2. I think Mussolini’s lack of organization significantly led to the people’s view of Fascism. Mussolini was a charismatic leader who relied on jargon and propaganda. People responded to this. That being said, I think the Italian people did not like Mussolini trying to become allies with Germany just so Italy could get stronger.

  3. I agree with Claire about Mussolini being criticized by “true” Fascists who glorified war if Mussolini had not taken a side-line position in WWII and did not attempt to join alliances with Germany in the war. However, I see this as short-term and throughout the course of the war, the Fascist State as well as, Mussolini could have lived a bit longer since Italians would be grateful in the long run. This once again still brings up the question of whether or not Italy would’ve been able to avoid the war even if Mussolini had not take a side-line position in WWII.

Comments are closed.