Nationalism Timeline

How Soviet Policy Shaped Post-Soviet Republics

Examining how early usage of Korenizatsia and Russification formed Ukraine and Estonia's national identity and policy

Loading

1923 — 1933

Korenizatsia (Indeginzation)

Korenizatsia was Lenin's response to non-russian opposition to the Soviet regime. The goal was to promote local national identity while still mantaining Marx's teachings and pushing a Soviet regime.

Loading

1933 — 1938

Purges

Following his coming to power Stalin began purges the Soviet Union of enemies to the state. One specific group were non-russian nationalists for the crime of instigating national strife.

Loading

1938 — 1985

Russification

After the purges and the informal abolishment of Korenizatsia. Stalin reduced the importance placed on local cultures and began to assimilate minorities in to the Soviet Union with a mix of Soviet culture/ideology and Russian language.

Loading

1987 — 2016

An Independent Estonia

As an independent country Estonia reformed a lot of Russification policy with the return of Estonian as its national language. It also settled on a case by case appraisal of Russian migrants and did not impose strict anti-Russian legislature in retalliation to Stalin's treatment of minorities.

Loading

1991 — 2016

An Independent Ukraine

Ukraines Independence was rockier despite an overwhelming majority vote to seperate from Russia the ties between the two countries are still strong. The Nationalist party that came to power put forth very anti-Russian legislature with the banning of the Ukrainian communist party and a complete reversal of Russification bringing back Ukrainian culture and ostracizing Russian.

 
Korenizatsia (Indeginzation)
1923 — 1933

Korenizatsia (Indeginzation)

Purges

Russification

An Independent Estonia

An Independent Ukraine

1690
1700
1710
1720
1730
1740
1750
1760
1770
1780
1790
1800
1810
1820
1830
1840
1850
1860
1870
1880
1890
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2060
2070
2080
2090
2100
2110
2120
2130
2140
2150
2160
2170
2180
2190
2200
2210
2220
2230
2240
1899
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038

Russia in Reform: Will the Duma Do it?

March 15 & 16 1917 marked a monumental day for the Russian people, the decision to abdicate the crown was made by Tsar Nikolai the second. Nikolai handed the crown to his brother Grand Duke Mikhail Alexandrovich whom reflecting the feelings of the nation passed on all power to the Provisional Government more popularly referred to as the Duma.

In the Duma’s address to the Russian populace they start with a declaration of victory over the “dark forces of the old regime” informing the people that they now have the power to re-organize the executive power of the nation. They then transition in to a list of the new cabinet positions created and who have been appointed to them at their political alignment. These men were chosen based off of their past political and public service so the public had relations with these men so they could understand that decisions will be made by the citizens. The next step for reassuring the public were the list of principles which this new government and its members will hold themselves to. The list contains the basis for a more liberal society with items such as: forgiveness for previous victims of the law, basic freedoms, equality between all citizens, suffrage, a more public police. The most questionable law being the lack of restrictions on active duty soldiers, which most likely is in response to the war Russia was fighting at the time. The Duma concludes that this war will not delay these reforms which Russia needed.

When thinking in terms to how the Duma addresses its people is this piece successful? Could they have added anything else? What’s your interpretation for the last principle regarding active duty soldiers?