When I first left Tower Hill Tube station and looked out over the road to the Tower of London, my first thought was “I really wish those cars weren’t driving on the road so I could get a clear picture.” Then I managed to get over my disappointment, reminding myself that I will be going there eventually and will be able to take pictures in abundance, I looked around and noticed the section of Roman Wall standing less than 100 feet to my left. I admit, knowing the importance of the Romans and the impact their wall had on the development of today’s London, I feel kind of silly for letting my eyes slide over it to the prettier and more picturesque Tower. That written, I think that my mistake of dismissing the wall as nothing but an unimportant ruin happens to countless tourists and even the people of London every day!
What I found most interesting about the Roman Walk was the idea that London is a modern city built on top of several stages of ancient city. The fact that the basement of a hair salon can house Roman ruins is difficult to fathom. However, the knowledge that people in the medieval ages recognized the brilliance of Roman engineering and decided to fortify and expand the existing wall is even more incredible.
When I started my second of two walks of yesterday, I didn’t know very much about the area or the people who have lived there. Although it was really neat to see where this writer and that philosopher worked and played, I was much more interested in the buildings and how they related to the history of London. There was one section of the tour that particularly captured my attention. When standing in the centre of one of the green spaces, you could look to one side and see original row houses, with the dark brown brick and white window frames, and to the other side you could only see bright red brick houses that seemed to have been completed in the last five to ten years. The original houses that still stand were only cosmetically damaged during the Blitz; while the red brick homes had been completely annihilated. What shocked me was that only a small span of grass and trees separated the barely injured and the completely destroyed.
Today at the Docklands Museum, the City and River: 1800-1840 exhibit really stood out. I’m not a huge fan of taxes and duties, but there was a section on customs and why the docks had to be formed that made a lot of sense to me. It explained that there was so much illegal shipping into London through unauthorized channels that something had to be done by the government to try to control it/use it to their advantage to get more money through taxes. What I found particularly interesting was that the proprietors of the different docks were paranoid of each other to a fault. They didn’t trust the police to look after their docks and warehouses, so they hired personal security forces to keep out anyone they didn’t want around. After seeing the different wharfs and how close they were to each other when I went up to Greenwich the other day, I completely understand the paranoia of the businessmen.
Even though I’ve been in London for only four days, I feel like I’m slowly beginning to understand that there is much more the London than I could have possibly imagined. I’m learning that I need to keep my eyes open because you never know when you’ll turn a corner and find the next nugget of history, culture, art, or architecture.
2 responses so far ↓
roseam // Aug 24th 2009 at 13:28
“What I found particularly interesting was that the proprietors of the different docks were paranoid of each other to a fault. ”
I must have missed this..what were they paranoid of? I’m assuming theft?
kstaab77 // Aug 24th 2009 at 13:39
A large part of it was paranoia of being robbed from their warehouses or docks. I got the sense from the exhibit that they were also worried about their competitors potentially sabotaging them or stealing whatever trade secrets they had.
You must log in to post a comment.