Over the past few days we had the opportunity to visit Sikh and Hindu holy places. Both were quite eye-opening in regard to immigration, identity and to us as a group in general. I have to start by saying that I won’t deny that both faiths are quite distinct and different from one another, but both also share the goal of trying to fit into life in the UK. I think this is fairly obvious enough.
Though the Sikh Gurdwara was a much simpler place than the Hindu Temple, it still cost a few million pounds to build. Like most religions, Sikhs preach helping their fellow man, but surely the cost to build a Gurdwara could have been substantially reduced to help others. One could argue that the Gurdwara brings a sense of community to the area, but what would be wrong with cheaper building? I’m sure that the individuals who donated money to build the Gurdwara were not thinking about the recognition they would receive from the community for doing so…but then again practicing what you preach has always been a problem for the religious.
Our Sikh guide, though difficult to hear at times, seemed to genuinely believe in what he said. To me, it appeared as if he was desperately looking for acceptance. Being in a country where he would probably be seen as an outsider, the Sikh guide just wanted to fit in. I found it interesting when he said something along the lines of “I wish for the day when a person can see Sikh in an airport and recognize that he is just a Sikh.” It was a nice thought, but one that probably won’t happen because it is unrealistic. People need to label things and each other; it’s part of the human condition to have insiders and outsiders.
The Hindu Temple also gave me the impression of a religion and culture trying to fit into life in the UK. Whereas the Sikh Gurdwara took a “simpler” approach, the Hindu Temple, as National Geographic put it, was a “London landmark.” Its enormous size, Italian marble and Bulgarian limestone made this quite evident. One thing that struck me was the pompous nature which seemed to pervade throughout the entire structure. The exhibition really brought this to the forefront by showing multiple times how Hindus did this or that before the person (European for the most part) we usually associate with a particular invention or discovery did. That really turned me off quite a bit and I don’t think it is a good idea to act so pretentiously if you are looking for acceptance.
One problem I had this both trips was that we went as a large group. At the Sikh Gurdwara we all had to wear scarves, but no one knew the proper way to wear them. I think everyone (jokingly and with no malicious intent) fooled around with ways to wear the scarf. For me, if I was a Sikh and saw that I would feel quite disrespected. Another problem I had was that at both holy places we had to show “respect” (i.e. bow/take part) in their prayer halls. I think if we just simply observed it would have been much more respectful.
Jumping to the BBC Religion and Ethics site, I found that internet matchmaking sites are becoming quite popular with Sikhs and Hindus and I think this is a great thing. It’s natural for a human to want to find a proper mate; the internet makes this much easier. But what I thought was fascinating was the how many people do not have a picture on those matchmaking sites. This seems like a good idea, but I feel as the world becomes more globalized and as more Sikhs and Hindus “assimilate,” the demand for a picture will be inevitable.