August 29, 2009
In my last blog, I mentioned how much I didn’t like the Tate Modern. Conversely, but maybe not surprisingly, I LOVED the National Gallery. I was especially excited to see works by Monet, and loved “The Grand Canal, Venice” in particular. Since Van Gogh is one of my favorite artists, I was also amazed to see “Sunflowers” and “A Wheatfield with Cypresses” in person. We continued to wander through rooms containing paintings by Renoir, Picasso, and many artists that I did not recognize (I found some new favorites to look into…Camille Pissarro, for one, who painted “Portrait of Felix Pissarro” and “The Boulevard Montmartre at Night”). I was impressed by the sheer size and detail in many of the paintings, as well as their incredible preservation. I always imagine paintings from so long ago to look old, but these looked as if they were painted yesterday.
The overwhelming majority of the museum’s earliest paintings focused either on mythology or the Virgin Mary/Jesus, and it gave me an idea about just how important these topics were to past generations. Maddie and I discussed how Jesus is almost always interpreted as a tall, thin, fair complexioned man when in reality, he was probably short, squat, curly haired and dark in complexion based on his geographical location. We also thought that “The Virgin and Child before a Firescreen” by a follower of Robert Campin looked almost modern due to how old fashioned it was. It seemed, to us, that art has come full circle in some ways. I was also surprised to stumble upon “The Birth of the Virgin” by Master of the Osservanza, because I’ve never thought or seen record of Mary’s birth. The focus is almost always on the birth of the Christ child, and it was interesting to see another portion of the Biblical story that is entirely overlooked.
