2025 Dickinson College Commentaries High School Online Internship Program

Dickinson College Commentaries (DCC) provides Latin and Greek texts for reading, with explanatory notes, essays, vocabulary, and graphic, video, and audio elements. The commentaries are peer reviewed and edited, and freely available at dcc.dickinson.edu.

The DCC High School Online Internship program is meant to give you a chance to contribute to the site, learn digital humanities skills, improve your Latin, and collaborate with others under the supervision of professional classicists. You will receive credit on the site for all contributions.

Statue of founder Benjamin Rush (1746-1813), in front of the East College building. East College is home to Dickinson’s Classical Studies Department and is the mother ship of DCC.

The projects are flexible enough to allow students of different levels of Latin, from intermediate to advanced, to meaningfully participate, and to give scope to those with special artistic, technical, linguistic, or research skills. The application process is simple and requires no essay or letters of recommendation.

Eligibility: Open to all rising High School Juniors and Seniors who have completed Latin 3. Graduating seniors may also apply.

Dates: June 23–Aug 1, 2025 (6 weeks)

Time commitment: 10–15 hours per week. The projects will involve a mix of independent work done on your schedule and mandatory Zoom meetings for approximately five hours per week.

Pay: this is an unpaid internship

Projects for 2025:

  • Select, edit, and enhance notes on Vergil’s Aeneid
  • Create images and other enhancements for the DCC Core Latin Vocabulary
  • Edit and enhance notes for Aesop’s Fables in the Latin version of Elegiac Romulus.

Application Deadline: Feb. 15, 2025.

Apply here: https://forms.office.com/r/sWvT11BXt7

Conventiculum Dickinsoniense 2025

July 14-19, 2025

conventiculum candidThe Conventiculum Dickinsoniense is an immersion seminar designed for those who want to acquire some ability at ex-tempore expression in Latin. A wide range of people can benefit from the seminar: professors in universities, teachers in secondary schools, graduate students, undergraduates, and other lovers of Latin, provided that anyone who considers applying has a solid understanding of the grammatical essentials of the Latin language. (Participants must be at least 18 years of age, unless accompanied by an adult guardian).

A minimum requirement for participation is knowledge of Latin grammar and the ability to read a Latin text of average complexity – even if this reading ability depends on frequent use of a dictionary.  But no previous experience in speaking Latin is necessary. Sessions will be aimed at helping participants to increase their ability to use Latin effectively in spoken discourse and to understand others speaking in Latin. After the first evening reception (in which any language may be spoken), Latin will be the language used throughout the seminar. Participants will be involved in intensive activity each day from morning until early evening (with breaks for lunch and mid-afternoon pauses). They will experience Latin conversations on topics ranging from themes in literature and art all the way to the routines and activities of daily life, and will enjoy the benefits of reading and discussing texts in the target language. Activities will involve both written and spoken discourse, both of which engage the active faculties of expression, and each of which is complementary to the other. The seminar will not merely illustrate how active Latin can be a useful tool for teachers, it will show how developing an active facility in Latin can directly and personally benefit any cultivator of Latin who wishes to acquire a more instinctive command of the language and a more intimate relationship with Latin writings.

Moderators:

Prof. Milena Minkova, University of KentuckyMinkova and Tunberg

Prof. Terence Tunberg, University of Kentucky

camp fire at the farm, Conventiculum farm dinner

camp fire at the Dickinson farm, Conventiculum Dickinsoniense

We can accept a maximum number of 35 participants. Deadline for applications is June 1, 2025. The participation fee for each participant will $600. The fee includes lodging in campus housing (and please note that lodging will be in a student residence near the site of the sessions), two meals (breakfast and lunch) per day, as well as the opening dinner, and a cookout at the Dickinson farm. Included in this price is also the facilities fee, which allows access to the gym, fitness center, and the library, as well as internet access. The $600 fee does not include the cost of dinners (except for the opening dinner and farm cookout), and does not include the cost of travel to and from the seminar. Dinners can easily be had at restaurants within walking distance from campus.  Please keep in mind that the participation fee of $600, once it has been received by the seminar’s organizers, is not refundable.  This is an administrative necessity.

Registered participants should plan to arrive in Carlisle, PA on July 14, in time to attend the first event of the seminar. This first event is an opening dinner and welcoming reception for all participants, which will begin at about 6:00 p.m., in which all languages are acceptable. The actual workshop sessions (in which Latin will the exclusive language) will begin early the next morning on July 15.

For more information and application instructions write to: Professor Terence Tunberg:

terence.tunberg@gmail.com

The girl and her suitor (Erasmus, Colloquia Familiaria)

This is a rather racy dialogue from Erasmus’ Colloquia Scholastica (1536). A discussion of the colloquia and link to the full text can be found here.

A Girl with a Birdcage and a SuitorAntoine Pesne (1683–1757) (after) National Trust, Wimpole Hall

Pesne, Antoine; A Girl with a Birdcage and a Suitor; National Trust, Wimpole Hall; http://www.artuk.org/artworks/a-girl-with-a-birdcage-and-a-suitor-171663

Proci et puellae

Personae

Pamphilus, Maria.

Pamphilus

Salve crudelis, salve ferrea, salve adamantina.

Maria

Salve tandem et tu Pamphile, quoties et quantum voles, et quocunque libet nomine. Sed interim mihi videris oblitus nominis mei; Maria vocor.

Pamphilus

At Martiam dici oportuit.

Maria

Quid ita, quaeso? Quid mihi cum Marte?

Pamphilus

Quia quemadmodum illi deo pro ludo est, homines interficere, ita et tibi: nisi quod tu Marte crudelior occidis etiam amantem.

Maria

Bona verba. Ubinam strages ista mortalium, quos ego occidi? Ubi sanguis interfectorum?

Pamphilus

Unum cadaver vides exanime, si modo me vides.

Maria

Quid ego audio? Mortuus loqueris, et obambulas? utinam mihi nunquam occurrant umbrae formidabiliores!

Pamphilus

Ludis tu quidem; tamen interim miserum exanimas, et crudelius occidis, quam si confoderes telo. Nunc longo cruciatu excarnificor miser.

Maria

Eho, dic, quot gravidae ad tuum occursum abortierunt?

Pamphilus

Atqui pallor arguit exsanguem magis, quam ulla sit umbra.

Maria

Atqui iste pallor tinctus est viola. Sic palles ut cerasus maturescens, aut uva purpurascens.

Pamphilus

Satis procaciter rides miserum.

Maria

Atqui si mihi non credis, admove speculum.

Pamphilus

Non optarim aliud speculum; nec arbitror esse clarius ullum, quam in quo me nunc contemplor.

Maria

Quod speculum mihi narras?

Pamphilus

Oculos tuos.

Maria

Argutator, ut semper, tui similis es! Sed unde doces esse exanimem te? An cibum capiunt umbrae?

Pamphilus

Capiunt, sed insipidum, qualem ego.

Maria

Quibus igitur vescuntur?

Pamphilus

Malvis, porris, et lupinis.

Maria

Atqui tu non abstines a capis et perdicibus.

Pamphilus

Verum; sed interim nihilo plus sapiunt palato meo, quam si malvis vescerer, aut betis absque pipere, vino et aceto.

Maria

O te miserum! et tamen interim obesulus es. An et loquuntur exanimes?

Pamphilus

Sic ut ego, voce perquam exili.

Maria

Atqui nuper quum audirem te conviciantem rivali tuo, vox non erat admodum exilis. Sed obsecro te, num etiam ambulant umbrae? num vestiuntur? num dormiunt?

Pamphilus

Etiam coeunt, sed suo more.

Maria

Nae tu suavis nugator es.

Pamphilus

Sed quid dices, si argumentis Achilleis evincam, et me esse mortuum et te esse homicidam?

Maria

Absit omen, Pamphile: sed aggredere sophisma.

Pamphilus

Primum illud mihi donabis, opinor, mortem nihil aliud esse, quam abductionem animae a corpore.

Maria

Largior.

Pamphilus

Sed ita, ut ne reposcas, quod dederis.

Maria

Non fiet.

Pamphilus

Tum haud inficiaberis, eum qui alteri adimit animam, homicidam esse.

Maria

Accedo.

Pamphilus

Concedes et illud, quod, a gravissimis auctoribus dictum, tot seculorum suffragiis comprobatum est, animam hominis non illic esse ubi animat, sed ubi amat.

Maria

Istuc explana crassius: non enim satis assequor, quid velis.

Pamphilus

Et hoc sum infelicior, quod istuc non aeque sentis atque ego.

Maria

Fac ut sentiam.

Pamphilus

Eadem opera fac ut sentiat adamas.

Maria

Equidem puella sum, non lapis.

Pamphilus

Verum: sed adamante durior.

Maria

Sed perge colligere.

Pamphilus

Qui corripiuntur afflatu divino, nec audiunt, nec vident, nec olfaciunt, nec sentiunt, etiamsi occidas.

Maria

Audivi sane.

Pamphilus

Quid coniectas esse in caussa?

Maria

Dic tu, philosophe.

Pamphilus

Nimirum quoniam animus est in coelis, ubi habet quod vehementer amat, et abest a corpore.

Maria

Quid tum postea?

Pamphilus

Quid tum, dura? Illud consequitur, et me esse mortuum, et te esse homicidam.

Maria

Ubi est igitur anima tua?

Pamphilus

Illic ubi amat.

Maria

Quis autem ademit tibi animam? quid suspiras? Dic libere, dices impune.

Pamphilus

Crudelissima quaedam puella, quam ego tamen ne mortuus quidem odisse possum.

Maria

Humanum ingenium. Sed cur illi vicissim non adimis suam animam, par pari, quod aiunt, referens?

Pamphilus

Nihil me felicius, si quidem liceat facere permutationem, sic ut illius animus vicissim demigret in pectus meum, quemadmodum meus animus totus demigravit in corpus illius.

Maria

At licetne mihi tecum vicissim sophistam agere?

Pamphilus

Sophistriam.

Maria

Num fieri potest, ut idem corpus sit animatum, et exanime?

Pamphilus

Non eodem quidem tempore.

Maria

Quum abest anima, tum mortuum est corpus?

Pamphilus

Est.

Maria

Nec animat, nisi quum adest?

Pamphilus

Esto sane.

Maria

Qui fit igitur, ut, quum ibi sit, ubi amat, animet tamen corpus, unde demigravit? Quod si animat, etiam quum amat alibi, quomodo vocatur exanime corpus, quod animatum est?

Pamphilus

Argutare tu quidem satis sophistice; sed me talibus pedicis non capies. Anima, quae moderatur utcunque corpus animantis, improprie dicitur anima, quum revera sint tenues quaedam animae reliquiae; non aliter quam odor rosarum manet in manu, etiam rosa submota.

Maria

Difficile est, ut video, vulpem capere laqueo. Sed illud responde: Nonne agit, qui occidit?

Pamphilus

Maxime.

Maria

Et patitur, qui occiditur?

Pamphilus

Scilicet.

Maria

Qui fit igitur, ut, quum qui amat, agat, quae amatur, patiatur, occidere dicatur, quae amatur, quum amans potius occidat seipsum?

Pamphilus

Imo contra; qui amat patitur: quae amatur, agit.

Maria

Istuc nunquam evinces apud Areopagitas Grammaticos.

Pamphilus

At evincam apud Amphictyones Dialecticos.

Maria

Verum ne graveris et illud respondere. Volens amas, an nolens?

Pamphilus

Volens.

Maria

Quum igitur liberum sit non amare, videtur homicida, quisquis amat; praeterque ius accusat puellam.

Pamphilus

Atqui puella non ideo occidit quod amatur, sed quod non amat mutuum. Occidit autem; quisquis servare potest, nec servat.

Maria

Quid si iuvenis amet inconcessa, hoc est, uxorem alienam, aut virginem Vestalem? num illa amabit mutuum, ut servet amantem?

Pamphilus

Sed hic iuvenis amat, quod amare fas piumque est, atque etiam aequum et bonum, et tamen occiditur. Quod si leve est homicidii crimen, et veneficii ream peragam.

Maria

Istuc prohibeant superi. An Circen quampiam ex me facies?

Pamphilus

Aliquid et ista crudelius. Nam porcus aut ursus esse malim, quam id quod nunc sum, exanimis.

Maria

Quo tandem veneficii genere perdo homines?

Pamphilus

Fascino.

Maria

An igitur vis, ut posthac abs te deflectam noxios oculos?

Pamphilus

Bona verba. Imo magis afflecte.

Maria

Si mihi sunt oculi fascinatores, qui fit, ut non contabescant et ceteri, quos obtueor? Itaque suspicor fascinum istud esse in tuis oculis, non in meis.

Pamphilus

Non sat tibi erat iugulare Pamphilum, ni insultes insuper?

Maria

O lepidum mortuum! Sed quando parabuntur exsequiae?

Pamphilus

Opinione tua celerius, ni tu succurras.

Maria

Egon’ rem tantam possum?

Pamphilus

Potes vel mortuum ad vitam revocare, idque minimo negotio.

Maria

Si quis mihi porrigat panacen.

Pamphilus

Nihil opus herbis; tantum redama. Quid autem facilius, imo quid aequius? Non aliter absolveris ab homicidii crimine.

Maria

Apud quod tribunal peragar rea? Areopagitarum?

Pamphilus

Non; sed apud tribunal Veneris.

Maria

Aiunt deam esse placabilem.

Pamphilus

Imo nullius ira perinde formidabilis.

Maria

Habet fulmen?

Pamphilus

Non.

Maria

Habet tridentem?

Pamphilus

Nequaquam.

Maria

Habet hastam?

Pamphilus

Minime, sed est dea maris.

Maria

Non navigo.

Pamphilus

Sed habet puerum.

Maria

Non est formidabilis aetas.

Pamphilus

Vindicem ac pervicacem.

Maria

Quid is mihi faciet?

Pamphilus

Quid faciet? Prohibeant omnes superi. Nolim enim illi malum ominari, cui bene volo.

Maria

Tamen effare; nulla mihi superstitio est.

Pamphilus

Dicam ergo. Si hunc spreveris amantem non omnino mutuo indignum amore, nisi fallor, ille fortasse iussu matris immittet tibi pessimo veneno tinctum iaculum, ut in sordidum aliquem depereas, qui te tamen non redamet.

Maria

Supplicium narras abominandum. Ego sane vel mori praeoptarim, quam perdite amare deformem, nec amore mutuo respondentem.

Pamphilus

Atqui nuper huius mali fuit exemplum insigniter editum in puellam quandam.

Maria

Ubi locorum?

Pamphilus

Aureliae.

Maria

Quot anni sunt?

Pamphilus

Quot anni? vix sunt menses decem.

Maria

Puellae quod erat nomen? Quid haeres?

Pamphilus

Nihil; novi tanquam te.

Maria

Quin igitur edis nomen?

Pamphilus

Quia non placet omen. Utinam alio quovis nomine dicta fuisset. Idem habebat nomen quod tu.

Maria

Pater quis erat?

Pamphilus

Vivit adhuc inter iureconsultos praecipui nominis, re splendida.

Maria

Adde nomen.

Pamphilus

Mauritius.

Maria

Cognomen.

Pamphilus

Aglaius.

Maria

Vivitne mater?

Pamphilus

Nuper reliquit superos.

Maria

Quo morbo periit?

Pamphilus

Quo morbo rogas? moerore. Et pater, tametsi vir cum primis fortis, periclitabatur.

Maria

Licetne scire matris quoque nomen?

Pamphilus

Maxime. Sophronam nemo non novit. Sed quid sibi vult ista percunctatio? An me putas apologum comminisci?

Maria

Egone de te suspicarer hoc? Haec suspicio pronior est in sexum nostrum. Sed narra, quid acciderit puellae.

Pamphilus

Puella erat honesto loco nata, ut dixi, re lauta, forma perquam eleganti: qui multis? digna principe marito. Huius nuptias ambiebat procus quidam illi non dissimilis.

Maria

Quo nomine?

Pamphilus

Hei mihi, offendor omine; Pamphilus et ille dictus est. Illa nihil non tentantem pertinacissime sprevit. Iuvenis dolore contabuit. Nec ita multo post illa deperire coepit in quendam, simium verius quam hominem.

Maria

Quid ais?

Pamphilus

Adeo perdite, ut satis dici non queat.

Maria

Tam elegans puella tam deformem?

Pamphilus

Vertice acuminato, raro capillitio, eoque lacero et impexo, furfure ac lendibus oppleto: pleramque cranii cutem nudaverat alopecia; oculis refugis, naribus simis ac sursum hiantibus, ore sparso, dentibus putridis, balbutiente lingua, mento scabioso; scapulas deformabat gibbus; venter prominulus, crura vara.

Maria

Thersiten quempiam mihi depingis.

Pamphilus

Imo aiunt, illi non fuisse nisi unam auriculam.

Maria

Altera perierat illi fortasse in bello.

Pamphilus

Imo in pace.

Maria

Quis hoc ausus est?

Pamphilus

Dionysius carnifex.

Maria

Fortasse formae infelicitatem pensabat res ampla domi?

Pamphilus

Imo decoxerat, ac plus quam animam debebat. Cum hoc marito tam insignis puella nunc degit aetatem, ac subinde vapulat.

Maria

Rem miseram narras.

Pamphilus

Sed veram. Sic visum est Nemesi iuvenis spreti contumeliam ulcisci.

Maria

Ego citius optarem exstingui fulmine, quam talem ferre maritum.

Pamphilus

Ergo ne provoca Nemesim, et amantem redama.

Maria

Si quidem istuc satis est, redamo.

Pamphilus

Sed optarim istum amorem esse perpetuum ac proprium: coniugem ambio, non amicam.

Maria

Neque me id fugit; sed diu deliberandum est in eo, quod semel coeptum rescindi non potest.

Pamphilus

Apud me quidem nimium diu deliberatum est.

Maria

Vide autem, ne tibi imponat amor, non optimus consultor. Nam caecum esse ferunt.

Pamphilus

Sed oculatus est, qui ex iudicio nascitur. Non ideo mihi talis videris, quod amem te; sed ideo te amo, quod talem te conspexerim.

Maria

At vide, ne non satis me perspectam habeas. Si calceum induisses, tum demum sentires, qua parte te urgeret.

Pamphilus

Iacienda est alea; quanquam ego multis auguriis colligo rem melius cessuram.

Maria

Etiam augur es?

Pamphilus

Sum.

Maria

Quibus igitur auguriis colligis? An volavit noctua?

Pamphilus

Illa volat stultis.

Maria

An a dextris advolavit iugum columbarum?

Pamphilus

Nihil istiusmodi. Sed mihi iam annis aliquot perspecta est probitas tuorum parentum: ea primum avis est non pessima, e bonis prognatam esse. Neque me clam est, quam salubribus monitis, quam sanctis exemplis apud hos sis instituta. Et plus est bene institui, quam bene nasci. Habes alterum augurium. Ad haec meis maioribus non omnino malis, ni fallor, iam olim cum tuis amicitia non vulgaris intercedit: quin et nos inter nos a teneris, quod aiunt, unguiculis noti sumus; nec male convenit geniis nostris. Iam aetas inter nos, res, dignitas, nobilitas, inter utriusque parentes paene paria sunt. Demum, quod est in amicitia praecipuum, tui mores mihi videntur non pessime quadrare ad meum ingenium. Potest enim per se praeclarum esse, quod tamen non sit aptum. Quam mei vicissim tuo congruant, nescio. Hae videlicet aves, mea lux, mihi promittunt fore inter nos felix, perpetuum ac laetum iucundumque connubium, modo ne tuus animus mali ominis cantionem nobis occinat.

Maria

Quam cantilenam optas?

Pamphilus

Ego praecinam: Sum tuus; tu succine: Sum tua.

Maria

Brevis quidem cantiuncula; sed longum habet epiphonema.

Pamphilus

Quid refert, quam longum, modo laetum?

Maria

Adeo mihi es invisus, ut nolim te committere, cuius in posterum poeniteat.

Pamphilus

Desine male ominari.

Maria

Fortassis alia tibi videbor, ubi morbus aut aetas hanc formam immutarit.

Pamphilus

Nec hoc corpus, o bona, semper erit aeque succulentum. Sed ego non contemplor tantum istud undique florens et elegans domicilium, hospitem magis adamo.

Maria

Quem hospitem?

Pamphilus

Animum istum tuum, cuius decor semper cum aetate crescet.

Maria

Nae tu plus quam Lynceus es, si istum perspicis per tot tectoria.

Pamphilus

Animum animo perspicio. Ad haec, in communibus liberis subinde repubescemus.

Maria

Sed interim perit virginitas.

Pamphilus

Verum. Sed eho, dic mihi, si tibi esset elegans pomarium, optares illic nihil unquam gigni praeter flores: an malles, delapsis floribus, videre arbores maturis pomis gravidas?

Maria

Ut argutatur!

Pamphilus

Saltem illud responde, utrum est elegantius spectaculum, vitis humi iacens et computrescens, an amplexa palum aut ulmum, eamque purpureis uvis degravans?

Maria

Responde tu mihi vicissim, utrum spectaculum amoenius, rosa nitens et lactea in suo frutice, an decerpta digitis ac paullatim marcescens?

Pamphilus

Ego rosam existimo feliciorem, quae marcescit in hominis manu, delectans interim et oculos et nares, quam quae senescit in frutice: nam et illic futurum erat, ut marcesceret; quemadmodum felicius est vinum, quod bibitur antequam acescat. Quanquam non statim marcescit flos puellae, si nupserit: imo video, multas, quae ante nuptias pallebant, languebant, ac velut extabescebant, ex congressu viri sic enituisse, ut tum demum florere coeperint.

Maria

Attamen favorabilis ac plausibilis apud omnes est virginitas.

Pamphilus

Elegans quidem res puella virgo: sed quid iuxta naturam prodigiosius anu virgine? Nisi matri tuae defluxisset flos ille, nos istum flosculum non haberemus. Quod si, ut spero, non sterile fuerit nostrum coniugium, pro una virgine multas dabimus.

Maria

Attamen aiunt, rem Deo gratissimam esse castitatem.

Pamphilus

Et ideo castam puellam mihi cupio nubere, ut cum illa caste vivam. Magis erit animorum quam corporum coniugium. Gignemus Reipublicae, gignemus Christo. Quantulum aberit hoc matrimonium a virginitate? Et fortasse olim sic convivemus, quemadmodum vixit cum Maria Ioseph. Sed interim discemus virginitatem. Non enim statim pervenitur ad summum.

Maria

Quid ego audio? Violanda virginitas, ut discatur?

Pamphilus

Quidni? Quemadmodum paulatim bibendo vinum parcius, discimus esse abstemii. Uter tibi videtur temperantior, qui in mediis deliciis accumbens abstinet, an qui semotus ab his, quae provocant intemperantiam?

Maria

Arbitror eum fortius temperantem, quem parata copia non potest corrumpere.

Pamphilus

Utri verius debetur laus castitatis, eine qui semet exsecat, an qui membris integris, tamen abstinet a Venere?

Maria

Equidem posteriori, meo calculo, tribuerim laudem castitatis, priori dementiam.

Pamphilus

An qui voto adstricti abiurant matrimonium, nonne quodam modo exsecant sese?

Maria

Videtur.

Pamphilus

Iam non est virtus non coire.

Maria

At non est?

Pamphilus

Sic accipe. Si per se virtus esset non coire, vitium esset coire. Nunc incidit, ut vitium sit non coire, coire virtus.

Maria

Quando hoc incidit?

Pamphilus

Quoties ab uxore ius suum petit maritus, praesertim si prolis amore quaerit complexum.

Maria

Quid si lasciviat? non est fas negari?

Pamphilus

Fas est monere, vel rogare potius blandius, ut temperet: pernegare instanti, fas non est. Quanquam hac quidem in parte raras audio querelas maritorum de suis uxoribus.

Maria

At dulcis est libertas.

Pamphilus

Imo gravis est sarcina virginitas. Ego tibi rex ero, tu mihi regina: imperabimus familiae nostro arbitratu: an tibi videtur ista esse servitus?

Maria

Vulgus coniugium capistrum vocat.

Pamphilus

Sed ipsi vero capistro digni sunt, qui sic vocant. Dic mihi, quaeso, an non animus tuus est alligatus corpori?

Maria

Videtur.

Pamphilus

Non aliter quam avicula caveae. Et tamen consule illum, an cupiat esse liber. Negabit, opinor. Quam ob rem? Quia libenter est alligatus.

Maria

Res est utrinque modica.

Pamphilus

Tanto tutior. Eam tu domi augebis parsimonia, quae non sine caussa dicta est magnum vectigal; ego foris industria.

Maria

Innumeras curas secum adferunt liberi.

Pamphilus

Sed iidem innumeras voluptates, ac saepenumero multo cum foenore reponunt parentibus officium.

Maria

Misera quaedam res est orbitas.

Pamphilus

An nunc orba non es? Quid autem opus in re dubia male ominari? Dic mihi, utrum malles nunquam nasci, an nasci moritura?

Maria

Equidem malim nasci moritura.

Pamphilus

Sic miserior est orbitas, quae prolem nec habuit, nec habitura est quemadmodum feliciores sunt, qui vixerunt, quam qui nec nati sunt, nec nascentur unquam.

Maria

Qui sunt isti, qui non sunt, nec erunt?

Pamphilus

Quanquam qui recusat ferre casus humanos, quibus omnes ex aequo sumus obnoxii, sive plebeii sumus, sive reges, is e vita migret oportet; et tamen quidquid acciderit, tu non feres nisi dimidium, ego maiorem portionem in me transferam. Ita si quid acciderit laeti, gemina fiet voluptas, si quid mali, societas adimet dimidium aegritudinis. Mihi vero, si fata vocent, dulce fuerit vel immori tuis complexibus.

Maria

Facilius ferunt homines, quod iuxta communes naturae leges accidit; sed video, quanto plus molestiarum adferunt nonnullis parentibus liberorum mores, quam mortes.

Pamphilus

Istius rei ne quid accidat, maxima ex parte in nobis situm est.

Maria

Qui sic?

Pamphilus

Quoniam fere boni nascuntur ex bonis, quod ad indolem attinet. Neque enim e columbis nascuntur milvii. Dabimus igitur operam, ut ipsi boni simus. Deinde curabimus liberos nostros ab ipso statim lacte sanctis praeceptis et opinionibus imbuendos. Plurimum refert, quid infundas rudi testulae. Ad haec curabimus, ut domi habeant exemplum vitae, quod imitentur.

Maria

Difficile est quod narras.

Pamphilus

Nec mirum; quia pulchrum est: atque ob hoc ipsum tu quoque difficilis es. At tanto studiis acrioribus huc enitemur.

Maria

Habebis sequacem materiam; tu vide, ut me formes fingasque.

Pamphilus

Sed interim pronuntia tria verba.

Maria

Nihil facilius; sed verba simulatque semel evolarint, non revolant. Dabo consilium utrique commodius. Ages cum tuis ac meis parentibus, ut utrorumque voluntate res transigatur.

Pamphilus

Ambire me iubes: tu potes tribus verbis rem certam reddere.

Maria

An possim, nescio: mei iuris non sum. Nec sine maiorum auctoritate olim coibant coniugia. Verum, utcunque est, arbitror, auspicatius fore nostrum coniugium, si parentum auctoritate coëat. Et vestrum est ambire, nobis decorum non est. Gaudet enim rapi virginitas, etiamsi nonnunquam vehementius amemus.

Pamphilus

Non pigebit ambire, modo ne me frustretur tuum unius suffragium.

Maria

Non frustrabitur; bono animo esto, mi Pamphile.

Pamphilus

Tu mihi heic religiosior es, quam vellem.

Maria

Imo tu tuum ipsius suffragium apud te prius expende. Nec affectum istum tuum adhibe in consilium, sed rationem. Quod affectus decernit, temporarium est: quod autem dictat ratio, perpetuo solet placere.

Pamphilus

Nae tu pulchre philosopharis; itaque parere certum est tuis consiliis.

Maria

Non poenituerit obsequii. Sed heus tu, incidit interim scrupulus, qui meum animum male habet.

Pamphilus

Valeant scrupuli.

Maria

Vin’ me nubere mortuo?

Pamphilus

Nequaquam sed revixero.

Maria

Amovisti scrupulum. Bene vale, mi Pamphile.

Pamphilus

Istuc tu cura.

Maria

Precor tibi laetam noctem. Quid suspiras?

Pamphilus

Laetam noctem ais? Utinam largiare, quod precaris.

Maria

Ne quid praepropere; adhuc tua messis in herba est.

Pamphilus

Nihilne tui mecum auferam?

Maria

Hunc pastillum, qui tibi cor exhilaret.

Pamphilus

Adde saltem osculum.

Maria

Cupio tibi virginitatem integram et illibatam tradere.

Pamphilus

An osculum aliquid decerpit virginitati?

Maria

Vis igitur, ut aliis quoque largiar oscula?

Pamphilus

Nequaquam: mihi servari volo mea oscula.

Maria

Tibi servo. Quanquam est aliud, cur in praesentia nec ausim dare osculum.

Pamphilus

Quid istuc?

Maria

Ais, tuum animum paene totum demigrasse in corpus meum; in tuo quam minimum superesse: vereor itaque, ne in osculo hoc ipsum; quod in te superest, transiliat in me, tuque iam totus fias exanimis. Accipe igitur dextram, mutui amoris symbolum, ac bene vale. Tu gnaviter rem gere. Ego interim Christum comprecabor, ut, quod agitur, utrique nostrum velit esse felix ac faustum.

Colloquia Scholastica from Stoa.org

In the years around 2007 a team of graduate students and faculty associated with the University of Kentucky’s Institute for Latin Studies under the direction of Ross Scaife did valiant digitization work on a set of Colloquia Scholastica (Neo-Latin Colloquia), mostly dating to the 16th century. Several of the digitized texts produced by the Institute’s group were encoded in TEI XML and hosted on an instance of the Perseus hopper at Stoa.org. Due to server changes in 2019 those digital files have since fallen off the face of the internet, and are only available via the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine.

Middle aged male scholar in a heavy robe

Portrait of Erasmus of Rotterdam by Hans Holbein the Younger German, ca. 1532. Oil on linden panel. New York, Metropolitan Museum 1975.1.138. Public Domain.

During the summer 2024 Conventiculum Dickinsoniense, Jackson Perry suggested that we at DCC might embark on a salvage project to scrape the files off the cumbersome and slow-loading home on the Wayback Machine and consolidate the pages. The amazing Megan Ayer completed that process recently, thanks to funding from the Roberts Fund for Classical Studies at the Dickinson Department of Classical Studies. The text are now in a publicly viewable Google Docs folder containing all twelve works from Stoa.org.

They represent approximately 457,650 words of digitized Latin not readily available elsewhere. They are free for copying and re-use.

What is the value of colloquia? They are precious guides to Latin as it was in its modern heyday as the main vehicle for the discourse of the scientific community, the scholarly world, and all the main academic disciplines. They deal with many topics and situations not encountered in surviving classical Latin, and so can serve as excellent guides to those who foster Latin as a spoken language today. (Ross Scaife is unfortunately no longer with us, but the University of Kentucky’s Department of Modern and Classical Languages and Cultures remains a thriving center for active Latin under the leadership of Professors Milena Minkova and Terence Tunberg. And work on the renewed study and enjoyment of neo-Latin colloquia scholastica continues there).

In addition to their obvious pedagogical value, the colloquia are also, as Terence Tunberg points out, precious historical sources:

Colloquia provide historians with a rich mine of information on daily life in the towns and cities of renaissance Europe, as well as academic life in schools and universities. In the Paedologia of Mosellanus, for example, … we learn the Latin authors studied in a given term could include works of contemporary humanists like Erasmus, as well as those of Roman authors like Cicero and Horace. We learn that it was still hard to find courses in Greek at most schools. We learn that better-off students might live off gifts from home, but many had to beg or do sordid jobs in the town to subsist. This was not just true of university students, but even of young boys in grammar schools. We see our student characters dress themselves for a festival, and learn that taking a bath was a special occasion, something one did only three or four times a year! In the colloquia not only of Mosellanus, but of many other authors too, we get a glimpse of the seedy characters, thieves and con-artists, pseudo-doctors who frequented the streets of late medieval towns.

(Terence Tunberg, “The Way Many Aspired to the Eloquence of the Few: The Neo-Latin Colloquium.” [2011]. In Mobs [Vol. 3]. Brill. p. 200)

Google Docs is obviously not a permanent hosting solution. My hope is that other fautores linguae latinae activae will pick them up and preserve them, maybe add macrons, pictures, audio, that sort of thing. If anybody wants to try editing some of this material in full DCC style, please let me know.

Ok, here is the list. Enjoy!

Franciscus Cervantes de Salazar (1514?-1575), Ad Exercitia Linguae Latinae Dialogi

Sebastianus Castalio (1515-1563), Dialogorum Sacrorum Libri Quatuor

Maturinus Corderius (1479-1564), Colloquia scholastica

Laurentius Corvinus (ca. 1465-1527), Latinum Ydeoma

Martinus Duncanus (1505-1590), Praetextata Latine Loquendi Ratio

Desiderius Erasmus (1466-1536), Colloquia familiaria

Ioannes Fontanus (1545-1615), Hortulus puerorum pergratus ac perutilis Latine discentibus

Petrus Mosellanus (1493-1524), Paedologia

Beraldus Nicolaus (1473-1550), Dialogus quo rationes quaedam explicantur quibus dicendi ex tempore facultas parari possit

Jacobus Pontanus (1542-1626), Progymnasmatum Latinitatis, sive Dialogorum Volumen primum, cum annotationibus

Petrus Popo, Colloquia de Scholis Herbipolensibus

Johannes Ludovicus Vives (1492-1540), Exercitatio Linguae Latinae

 

Dickinson Latin Workshop 2025: Vergil, Georgics Book 4

July 7–12, 2025

The Dickinson Workshops are mainly intended for teachers of Latin, to refresh the mind through study of an extended text, and to share experiences and ideas. Sometimes those who are not currently engaged in teaching have participated as well, including students, retirees, and those working towards teacher certification.

gold ring with bee design

A Greek gold ring, 3rd c. BC, in the collection of the Getty Museum.

The text for 2025 will be Vergil’s fourth Georgic, which poetically discusses the honeybee hive, its “customs, activities, peoples and wars” (mōrēs et studia et populōs et proelia). It also contains a memorable account of the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice. The workshop will be conducted both in person and online. For those attending in person, there will be an optional field trip to an apiary and a walk to look for plants and trees mentioned in the text. If time permits, we will read sections from Ovid’s Metamorphoses Book 10 about Orpheus and Eurydice.

Moderators:

Elizabeth Manwell, Professor of Classics, Kalamazoo College

Christopher Francese, Asbury J. Clarke Professor of Classical Studies, Dickinson College

Fees, Meals, Facilities, and Lodging

The fee for each participant is $600 for those attending in person, $400 for those attending online. The fee for in person attendees covers lodging, breakfast and lunch in the Dickinson cafeteria, the facilities fee, which allows access to the gym, fitness center, and the library, as well as wireless and wired internet access while on campus. The fee does not cover the costs of books or travel, or of dinners, which are typically eaten in the various restaurants in Carlisle. Please keep in mind that the participation fee, once it has been received by the seminar’s organizers, is not refundable. This is an administrative necessity.

Lodging: accommodations will be in a student residence hall near the site of the sessions.

Daily Routine

The first event for those attending in person is an introductory dinner at 6:00 p.m., July 7. Starting July 8, sessions will meet from 1:00p.m. to 4:30 p.m. each day, with mornings left free for preparation (or for field trips for those attending in person). The final session ends at 4:30 p.m. on July 12.

To Register

Please email Mrs. Stephanie Dyson, Classical Studies Academic Department Coordinator (dysonst@dickinson.edu). Include your email, physical address, phone number, and the name of the workshop you plan to attend. A non-refundable fee is due by June 1, 2025 in the form of a check made out to Dickinson College, mailed to Stephanie Dyson, Department of Classical Studies, Dickinson College, Carlisle PA 17013.

For more information, please contact Prof. Chris Francese (francese@dickinson.edu)

Aeneid Progress

Thanks to a very talented group of students under the supervision of Dr. Lucy McInerney (B.A. Dickinson ’15, PhD Brown ’24), the DCC edition of Vergil’s Aeneid is now complete through Book 2. The initial release back in 2016 only covered the then AP selections. It was always my intent to expand the coverage, and the opportunity to complete Books 1 and 2 came this summer (2024) with the pilot Dickinson College Commentaries High School Online Internship Program. 

The inaugural 2024 program served a total of 24 students over the period June 24 through August 2. Five were rising juniors (class of ’26), 16 were rising seniors (’25), and three had just graduated. Ten were from public schools, 10 from private schools, and 4 from parochial schools. The states represented were PA (7), NY (5), MA (4), NC (3), CA (2), TN (2), and VA (1).

Two  groups (of four total) worked with Lucy on gathering notes for the Aeneid. They drew on a variety of published and public domain commentaries. They met on Zoom five days per week for 50 minutes and read Latin and chose and edited notes on their own, before and after the daily sessions. They completed the so-far uncommented selections of Books 1 (177 lines) and 2 (330 lines). The group from Book 1 finished early and was able to do some final proofreading on the work done by the Book 2 group. Lucy cleaned up the results, and I did a final editing pass, adding some hyperlinks, fixing formatting, and adding a few notes of my own where I thought they were needed.

Huge thanks are due to the students and their teachers:

The Book 1 group was Felix Chen (The Harker Upper School, San Jose, CA, teacher Scott Paterson), Victoria Greco and Madeline LaJoy (Shenendehowa High School, Clifton Park, NY, teacher Keziah Armstrong), and Bridget Bauman (East Chapel Hill High School in Chapel Hill, North Carolina, teacher Jenni Hoffman).

Zoom group of 8 or so people

The Book 2 group was Maeve Cannon and Imaan Ansari (Trinity School in New York, NY, teachers Peter Aronoff and Eric Casey), Lily Moore (San Luis Obispo Classical Academy High School, teachers Sarah Weinschenk [Dickinson ’84] and Pamela Bleisch), Thea Blakley (Central Magnet School, Murfreesboro, TN, teacher Lindley Henson), and Xan Matuch (The Haverford School, Haverford, PA, teacher Andrew Fenton).

Kentucky Neo-Latin Symposium 2024

I am excited to attend my first Kentucky Neo-Latin Conference this week, organized by the amazing Jennifer Tunberg and Laura Manning. The program does not seem to be freely available online, so I reproduce it here.

KLFC Neo-Latin Symposium program screenshot

Thursday, April 18, 2024 – 9:10 a.m. to 10:50 a.m. Via Zoom

Latin and Scientific Discovery in Australia and Peru; Learning Latin in Mexico

Organized by: Jennifer Tunberg, University of Kentucky. Chaired by: Terence Tunberg, University of Kentucky

9:109:20 Welcoming Remarks

9:209:40

“Flora in the Antipodes: Baron Ferdinand von Mueller’s Fragmenta Phytographiae Australiae.” Peter James Dennistoun Bryant. Independent scholar, Conventicula Lexintoniensia

9:4010:00

“A Medical Thesis by a Peruvian Mulatto Towards the End of the Colonial Period.” Angela Helmer (University of South Dakota)

10:0010:20

“What if the earliest students of Latin in the Americas were… Aztecs? Indigenous Latin in early colonial Mexico.” Ambra Marzocchi (Brown University; University of Kentucky alumna)

10:2010:50 Discussion

10:501:00 Pause

Thursday, April 18, 2024 – 1:00 p.m. to 3:20 p.m. via Zoom

Translation, Style, Censorship: 4 NeoLatin Texts, ss. 1618

Organized by: Laura Manning and Jennifer Tunberg, University of Kentucky. Chaired by: Milena Minkova, University of Kentucky

1:001:20

“Moro, Maumethanus, or both? Descriptions of Islamic believers in Archangelus Madrignanus’s Itinerarium.” Shruti Rajgopal (University College Cork, Ireland)

1:201:40

“Cleansing the Channels of Expression? The Early Prose Style of Bonaventure Baron (16101696)” Jason Harris (University College Cork, Ireland)

1:402:00 Discussion

2:002:20 Pause

2:202:40

“Quanto Elegantius, Tanto Difficilius: on the Latin of Jacobus Trigland III’s Diatribe de Secta Karæorum” Justin Mansfield. Independent Scholar

2:403:00

“Timui ne a censoribus italicis prohiberetur: An analysis of prepublication censorial interventions in Gian Vittorio Rossi’s Pinacotheca” Jennifer Nelson (The Robbins Collection, UC Berkeley School of Law

3:003:20 Discussion

Friday, April 19, 2024 – 10:00 a.m. to 12:40 p.m. via Zoom

Empire and Colony in Europe and the New World: Four NeoLatin Perspectives, ss. 1618

Organized by: Julia Hernández and Laura Manning. Chaired by: Leni Ribeiro Leite (University of Kentucky)

10:0010:20

“Luisa Sigea’s Syntra (1553): Framing Feminine Space at the “Hesperian” Margin of Empire.” Julia Hernández (New York University)

10:2010:40

“Epic emulation of Vergil’s Georgics in Basílio da Gama’s Brasilienses Aurifodinae.” Dreykon Fernandes Nascimento (University of Espírito Santo)

10:4011:00 Discussion

11:0011:20 Pause

11:2011:40

“Translating AntiImperial Dissent in NeoLatin: Antonio de Guevara’s Horologium Principum.”  Matthew Gorey (Wabash College)

11:4012:00

“Traveling to Lisbon: Maffei’s Historiae Indicae (1588) and the Portuguese Empire.” Christopher Francese (Dickinson College)

12:0012:20 Discussion

12:2012:40 Closing Remarks

Dickinson Summer Greek Workshop 2024: Xenophon, Cyropaedia

DICKINSON SUMMER GREEK WORKSHOP: JULY 2226, 2024 

Moderators: Prof. Norman B. Sandridge (Howard University) 

Prof. Scott Farrington (Dickinson College) 

For the 2024 Dickinson Summer Greek Workshop we will read selections from Xenophons Cyropaedia, “The Education of Cyrus. Xenophon’s consideration of the best education for a just ruler, often described as a “historical romance,” contains elements of biography, philosophy, history, fiction, and political science. The crown jewel of Xenophon’s literary output, the Cyropaedia enjoyed great popularity in Republican Rome, was considered essential reading by Scipio, Cicero, and Cato, and has much to offer Hellenists of every stripe. Book cover for Loving Humanity, Learning, and Being Honored: The Foundations of Leadership in Xenophon's Education of Cyrus (Hellenic Studies Series) showing a Persian king in a garden.

Leading our workshop will be Prof. Norman B. Sandridge (Howard University), author of Loving Humanity, Learning, and Being Honored: The Foundations of Leadership in Xenophon’s Education of Cyrus (Center for Hellenic Studies, 2012). 

The workshop will take place on Zoom from 1:00 to 4:30 p.m. EDT. We hope that this format will allow participants from around the world to join us. 

TO APPLY: Please email Mrs. Stephanie Dyson, Classical Studies Academic Department Coordinator (dysonst@dickinson.edu). Include your email and the name of the workshop you plan to attend. A non-refundable fee of $200.00 is due by June 1, 2024, in the form of a check made out to Dickinson College, mailed to Stephanie Dyson, Department of Classical Studies, Dickinson College, Carlisle PA 17013. 

 

Dickinson Summer Latin Workshop 2024: Luisa Sigaea

July 9–14, 2024

The Dickinson Workshops are mainly intended for teachers of Latin, to refresh the mind through study of an extended text, and to share experiences and ideas. Sometimes those who are not currently engaged in teaching have participated as well, including students, retirees, and those working towards teacher certification.

The 2024 workshop will be conducted both in person ($600) and online ($400) and consist of readings from Luisa Sigaea de Velasco. (biography from womenwriters.nl.)

painted portrait of a woman in high collar dress, with Latin text at the side from her book,

Source: El Plural.com

Luisa Sigea is a very unusual example of a female scholar for both Portugal and Spain. Educated by her father, Diego Sigeo, Luisa was particularly famous for knowing Latin, Greek, Hebrew, Chaldean, and Arabic as well as some modern languages. In 1542, she went with her sister to Queen Catarina’s court. Here they were at the service of the king’s sister, D. Maria of Portugal. Luisa had access to the royal library and could dedicate herself to her literary pursuits. Her most famous works, produced during these years, are: Duarum Virginum Colloquium de vita aulica et privata, a bucolic dialogue filled with classical topoi, and Syntra, a poem dedicated to her patron (D. Maria). We also have some letters, including letters sent to Pope Paul III. Sigea was by far the best and most renowned female scholar of her age.[1]

Texts for the workshop will be provided, based on the best modern editions.

Moderators:

Leni Ribeiro Leite, Associate Professor of Classics, The University of Kentucky

Ashley Roman, Adjunct Professor of Latin, Dickinson College

Fees, Meals, Facilities, and Lodging

The fee for each participant is $600 for those attending in person, $400 for those attending online. The fee for in person attendees covers lodging, breakfast and lunch in the Dickinson cafeteria, the facilities fee, which allows access to the gym, fitness center, and the library, as well as wireless and wired internet access while on campus. The fee does not cover the costs of books or travel, or of dinners, which are typically eaten in the various restaurants in Carlisle. Please keep in mind that the participation fee, once it has been received by the seminar’s organizers, is not refundable. This is an administrative necessity.

Lodging: accommodations will be in a student residence hall near the site of the sessions. The building features suite-style configurations of two double rooms sharing a private bathroom, or one double and one single room sharing a private bathroom.

Daily Routine

The first event for those attending in person is an introductory dinner at 6:00 p.m., July 9. Starting July 10, sessions will meet from 1:00p.m. to 4:30 p.m. each day, with mornings left free for preparation. The final session ends at 4:30 p.m. on July 14.

To Register

Please email Mrs. Stephanie Dyson, Classical Studies Academic Department Coordinator (dysonst@dickinson.edu). Include your email, physical address, phone number, and the name of the workshop you plan to attend. A non-refundable fee is due by June 1, 2024 in the form of a check made out to Dickinson College, mailed to Stephanie Dyson, Department of Classical Studies, Dickinson College, Carlisle PA 17013.

For more information, please contact Prof. Chris Francese (francese@dickinson.edu)

[1] Sofia Frade, “Hic sita Sigea est: satis hoc: Luisa Sigea and the Role of D. Maria, Infanta of Portugal, in Female Scholarship,” in Women Classical Scholars: Unsealing the Fountain from the Renaissance to Jacqueline de Romilly ed. Rosie Wyles and Edith Hall (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), p. 48. (preview from OUP)