Hausarbeiten at the University of Bremen

by Alex Arnold ’27

As we prepare to start the second semester here in Bremen, I wanted to take a moment to share about one of the central elements of the Dickinson in Bremen program, which often gets passed over in blog posts in favor of exciting excursions or volunteer experiences. What is this overlooked, yet fundamental, piece of the study abroad experience? The academics, of course. But wait! Don’t let your eyes glaze over and your focus drift away, because, unlike the monotone lecture of a professor who just can’t seem to retire, this reflection about completing my first semester at the University of Bremen is far more interesting than you might think! I’d like to share about the unique experience I had while writing one of my final papers and why I, counterintuitively, had a blast doing it.   

First, an overview of where the academic calendar in Germany differs to the one we are used to in the United States. While in the U.S. the fall semester typically starts in late August/early September and ends mid-December, in Germany, there is the “winter semester”. In the German winter semester, classes begin in early October, continuing through the end of January with a two-week break for the Christmas and New Year holidays. At the beginning of February, lectures end, but the winter semester is still not over! Two months succeed the end of the lecture period in which students compose final papers, known as Hausarbeiten, for their courses (particularly those in the humanities), which are due in March. This period is known as the “Vorlesungsfreie Zeit” or “lecture-free time”. Of course, not all courses follow this structure, with some relying instead on exams. After all work from the first semester has been handed in, the second semester, “summer semester”, begins in the second week of April, with much the same structure.  

In this blog post, I want to share about my experience writing one particular Hausarbeit for a course I took in the winter semester entitled “Niederdeutsch – Sprachliche Variationen in Norddeutschland”, or “Low German – Linguistic Variations in North Germany”. For those who haven’t studied German, it might come as a surprise to learn that a country as small as Germany is home to a wide variety of dialects. In northern Germany, one such dialect, which is sometimes even considered its own language, is “Niederdeutsch” or “Low German”. It is better known to Germans as “Plattdeutsch” or simply “Platt”, meaning flat. In the Middle Ages throughout the Renaissance, Low German was used widely across northern Germany, particularly as a common language for conducting trade during the highly lucrative time of the Hanseatic League. Since its golden age, the dialect has lost its prominence and is spoken far less frequently. Today, it is mostly found in small pockets across northern Germany, primarily in rural areas, spoken by older generations.  

While brainstorming possible research questions for my Hausarbeit (a paper’s focus is usually left open for students to determine and approved after consultation with the professor), I began looking into the connection between Low German and the United States. Much to my surprise, I discovered that Low German has a rich history in the United States. Determining how the dialect made its way into the U.S. and what influence it’s had became the guiding questions of my paper. Finding a way to connect the topic to back home, of course, made the research far more enjoyable. But there was something else that made this project feel special, and for that, I have to thank the EU. 

In 1999, the European Union officially recognized Low German with the status of “regional language” and in doing so mandated the implementation of measures to protect and preserve the language from extinction in Germany. These measures included the establishment of a council for the preservation of Low German, introduction of Low German courses in select schools and universities (such as the very course I was taking at the University of Bremen), as well as the creation of a dedicated institute called the “Institut für niederdeutsche Sprache” (INS) to support research on the dialect. 

It was a dark hour. I had neared the end of where the university library catalog could get me in terms of the history on Low German in the United States, having found nothing but a single anthology. I was seriously starting to worry that I was not going to be able to find the information I needed to write about this topic. That’s when some luck struck in the form of the INS. 

View of Bremen’s historic Schnoor district. ©A.Arnold

Having heard about the existence of the INS in my seminar, I decided to do some poking around and see just what type of institute it was. All I knew about the place was that it was situated in a historic building in Bremen’s “Schnoor” district, one of the oldest and most beautiful areas of town. I had walked by it many times, in fact, but had never seen so much as a light on inside. I had little hope but great desperation. I think this is what led me to pick up the phone and make a call to the number listed on the INS-Website. With a mounting fear that someone would actually pick up on the other end of the line, I paced determinedly, ready to spring into my rehearsed dialogue. Next to tornadoes, talking on the phone in German may be one of my greatest fears, you see. To my surprise, I had a lovely conversation that proved to be invaluable in the process of writing my research paper. What I learned over the telephone was that the INS is home to the largest collection of books written in Low German as well as countless other works regarding all things Low German and that all these materials could be browsed online using the INS’s library catalog search service. Jackpot. 

From that point on, the fun really started. Next thing I knew, I had arranged an appointment at the INS building in Schnoor to read through the many resources that I had found in my searches through the online catalog. During this process, I found out that INS had very limited hours, opening only for a few hours Tuesday through Thursday, which explained why I had never seen any sign of life in the building before. I wasn’t sure what to expect when I stepped foot in the charming building for the first time.  

The face of the INS-Building located in Schnoor. The words “us Platt bewohr us ditt ole Snoorhuus” displayed on the building’s facade are Low German, meaning “This old Schnoor-House preserves our Platt”. ©A.Arnold

Whatever my expectations were, it’s fair to say that they were quickly exceeded. The house, although it doesn’t look it from the outside, contains four stories. The spiral staircases, various small rooms, winding corridors, and a frankly confusing but homey layout attest to its ancient construction. All of it lined, floor to ceiling, with books and other archived materials, either composed in or relating to Low German. There must be some organizational system to it all, because, upon showing the INS-library’s only employee the call numbers of the resources I wanted to access, she sprang into action, retrieving the works I had identified. What really sealed the deal was when the librarian offered me a quiet workplace on the building’s second floor where I was allowed to stay as long as the premises were open. The view out of second floor window, looking out into the narrow, picturesque street of Schnoor says it all.

View out of the second-floor window of the INS after a rainstorm.  ©A.Arnold

I came back to the INS building as often as I could while working on my paper. Upon its completion, I was met with a little bit of sadness that I wouldn’t have a reason to visit the INS so often anymore. But, in thanking the librarian for all her help, she reminded me that I am always welcome to stop in whenever I’m passing by. And as for Low German in the United States, the story continues into the present. Many groups with North German heritage living in the U.S. today, particularly Mennonites who immigrated in the late 19th and early 20th century, together with members of clubs founded by immigrants, as well as various academics dedicated to the study of Low German, keep the dialect alive across the United States. 

Studying Econ in Bremen

by Grear Boyd ’25

Hello!

My name is Grear and I was an economics student at Vanderbilt University until the Spring of 2025. I was blessed to be able to participate in the Durden Dickinson in Bremen program in Sommersemester 2024, where I took two German Studies equivalent classes and two economics classes at Uni Bremen. I was pleased to find that the economics department at Uni Bremen offered a wide variety of courses, both core and elective, in both English and German. Typically, the core courses were more so offered in German and elective courses more so in English, although there were exceptions. If you feel your German ability is sufficient to take a core economics class in German, I would highly recommend it as I believe it would make a significant and positive addition to the immersion aspect of the program at large.

Personally, my German skills were not quite sufficient to be able to do this, and I took Environmental Macroeconomics with Professor Klarl and International Public Finance with Professor Heinemann. Both professors were approachable, despite English being their second languages, and passionate about their respective subjects, especially Prof. Klarl, who has extensive publications in the field of environmental economics. I was particularly impressed, and even moved by his obvious passion for environmental protection and his emphasis on how environmentalism and economic viability are not mutually exclusive.

In contrast to typical American course structure, economics coursework at Uni Bremen are largely independent, with lectures meeting only on a weekly basis and graded homework being virtually nonexistent. That said, you will be solely responsible for mastering course concepts both in preparation for final papers (Hausarbeit) and for the general advancement of your education. Initially, that seemed to me to be slightly intimidating, but, after having experienced this system, I now consider it to be rather empowering. After all, absorption of personal responsibility in this manner is, in my opinion, what an immersive study abroad program like this one is all about. It serves to transform children into personally responsible adults! Just kidding, but only kind of. Really, these courses do serve you in becoming a stronger, more independent person. And that is truly reflected in the structure of these economics courses.

That said, you will not be without support, should you feel you need some. In my experience, Professors Klarl and Heinemann were happy to schedule meetings or speak after class about any questions or concerns you may have about course materials or Hausarbeit. Aside from that, you will always have the opportunity to connect with your peers, as many of them are also international students, likely with the same or similar concerns as you may have. So be sure to take advantage of that resource.

Lastly, a final note of appreciation for these courses that I might add would be the European perspective applied to the field of economics. I often found that, in the United States, the teaching of economics revolves around American economic history, United States (US) central banking and the Federal Reserve. Put simply, I learned economics in the US with “America as the center of the world”, if you will. My point is, I found it mind opening to view global trade, supply chains, taxation/public finance, etc., from the perspective of the European Union and with the US as a foreign entity.

Laboratory science courses at Uni Bremen

by Ellen Boldt ’26

As a Biology major, I pursued multiple laboratory science courses during my time abroad.  These were often my most challenging classes, due to the complexity of the vocabulary.  In the fall, I took a Vertebrate Biology course, which involved three-hour dissection labs every week, during which time I dissected a mouse, goldfish, and part of a preserved dogfish shark. The labs were supposed to teach us to focus on certain aspects of what we had learned in class.  We looked at organs in terms of an evolutionary continuum, except for the shark dissection, which focused on sensory exploration. 

Nature Walks in Bremen ©Ellen Boldt

In the fall semester (Vertebrates), there were about 40 students in the labs, overseen by one professor and about four teaching assistants.  This structure was a much larger class than I would have been used to in the US, and with less supervision and group work for the lab procedures than I expected as well.  The lab procedures were more broadly structured and less rigidly paced, as students were expected to follow a written procedure with minimal overview and help.  In my American lab experience, the final product of the lab on which we would be graded would be a written report with observations, or possibly showing our dissection work for an anatomy lab.  However, both my vertebrate class in the fall and my animal diversity class in the spring, which focused on invertebrates, required us to submit notated drawings and diagrams of the structures we were dissecting and observing, with minimal forehand guidance of what we were looking for: just a list of parts that we would need to label. 

These differences were challenging but provided a practical way for us to learn structures.  Making us try to find structures as we dissected, and then draw them as we found them, was a good way for us to show what we were learning, and to show that we had captured the context of the body parts we identified. 

In the spring semester (Animal Diversity), there was an even bigger class of at least sixty students in each lab group.  Rather than dissecting, we observed whole samples of arthropods and invertebrates preserved in alcohol.  This was easier in some ways than following a delicate dissection procedure, but labelling microscopic structures was its own challenge, as well as identifying the samples by species through use of a dichotomous key (in German!).  One assignment I struggled with particularly was when I tried to draw sections of bumblebee wings so I could label them.  On the other hand, I enjoyed making the drawings and occasionally received compliments on them, which helped to build my confidence.  While I was familiar enough with using dichotomous keys to be mostly effective, I draw the line at beetles.  The known beetle species comprise 25% of all known animal species—there are too many for an amateur to meaningfully differentiate with so blunt a tool as a dichotomous key! 

Drawing and labeling the sections of bumblebee wings. ©Ellen Boldt

It was hard when we did field work at an outdoor nature preserve, because I didn’t have my computer with me for looking up words; I could sometimes identify an animal by its English name without knowing what it was called in German. 

One of the last Biology projects for my year in Bremen was a trip with my Animal Diversity class to the Übersee (Oversea) Museum, which is a sort of natural history museum.  A group of about 30 of us went into a back room and got to handle some of the artifacts that had been collected from around the world, including ancient wasps that had been preserved in amber.  My group made dichotomous keys to identify specimens of squid and octopi. I was amazed to learn that Germans don’t have differentiated commonly used words for squid, octopus, and cuttlefish:  they were all called by the same name in German, “Tintenfisch”! 

Conducting the labs in German provided an extra layer of challenge, but I am glad I was able to familiarize myself with a new category of German vocabulary.  I communicated with my lab partners in German but did find myself looking up quite a few words in my German-English dictionary.